Forums

We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.

Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.

Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.

To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home

Cheltenham Festival

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 112 comments are related to the topic:
Long Run!

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 3 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 112
By:
revedesivola
When: 30 Sep 10 21:51
i meant the same but am not as good with words as you can see. but kauto 28 lbs better..... i think not
By:
Bobby Dazzler
When: 30 Sep 10 21:54
Wouldn't have minded the chance to risk a few quid on BM off those terms
By:
revedesivola
When: 30 Sep 10 21:55
hah no. put the whole kitty on
By:
R Carver
When: 30 Sep 10 22:18
Hi Bobby, I agree with all that. I agree too re Kauto - his high form level consistency and high form level consistency over a variety of different trips are what i like most about the horse. He's obviously achieved tonnes more over staying trips, but he's as good as any 2 miler i have seen.

Anyway, anyway, my rambling aside, i agree that the handicapper has gone bananas. And the press overhype them. The way the handicapper reacts to debutant novices is, for me, in danger of ruining hte novice game. I recall one horse last yr (i'll not name it) winning an egg and spoon race last yr at a gaff track midweek, first time out. Horse gets a mark in the mid 140's. I feel trainers are almost forced to run babies in handicaps for good money because if they go the traditional route they will blow their mark winning 3 small prizes.
By:
duffy
When: 30 Sep 10 22:24
eh...140 after it's first run...you'll have to name itShocked
By:
R Carver
When: 30 Sep 10 22:29
140something  - it was its first run over fences after 2 yrs hurdling. I wont name it, but i assume trainer put it in a handicap immediately after its first run, hence obtaining its mark. It didn't run in a handicap next time out btw. If it ever manages to win a handicap off that mark, and its dropped a few pounds after 3 chase runs since, i'll reveal the horses name!
By:
duffy
When: 30 Sep 10 22:33
what gaff track did it win atMischief
By:
Bobby Dazzler
When: 30 Sep 10 22:37
The novice chase program is a mess. If you have a handicap prospect then the last thing you want to do is take on anything from the top yards - if you finish beaten 10 lengths by an eased down graded class horse then your handicap mark is blown. As most novice chases contain this potential danger then you have small fields. I believe they should split the program into maiden novice chases which are open to all, and a range of races based upon the hurdle mark of the horses going chasing. You would only be allowed to run in three of these and then would have to move into novice handicaps or handicaps.
By:
R Carver
When: 30 Sep 10 22:38
ha duffy i dont wanna say on here. if you give me your email address i will email it to you - as long as you promise not to put it on here!! I know some people associated with it, and do not want to disclose publicly but will email it to you.. it was a southern track..
By:
R Carver
When: 30 Sep 10 22:48
That would put the cat amongst the pigeons BD! I've not thought about it long and hard, but its in the back of my mind that the problem we are talking about is aggravated by power in jumping being less widely dispersed and more concentratd in fewer, all-powerful yards. Not sure. Anyway, night all.
By:
revedesivola
When: 30 Sep 10 22:54
night r carver. your knowlegable views are much appreciated
By:
R Carver
When: 30 Sep 10 22:58
RDS - its 4/11 you really mean rambling and incoherent! [;)]
By:
revedesivola
When: 30 Sep 10 23:02
nope absolutely not. knowledgable, informed, opinionated, honest and probably slightly tired so adios
By:
CVByrne
When: 01 Oct 10 09:58
I have to disagree with Bobby, this is a golden era of chasers. The reason the times comparison fails here is due to the new use of tactical speed. Best explained by using kauto as an example, the overall time a race is run in depends on the pace set by another horse.

Kauto's brilliance is how he travels so well through a race and has enough stamina to use his speed to pull away at the end. The reason we saw such a good performance in the king george is because of the pace set by nacarat allowed kauto to show the true depth of his superiority over the opposition. A flawless exhibition of jumping, cruising speed and stamina.

For this reason comparing times and distance of victory to gauge a houses talent fails, and hence the official ratings fail. That is why I put no stock in the ratings system.
By:
CVByrne
When: 01 Oct 10 10:15
Though I do agree with the sentiment kauto's consistency is his greatest talent. How a horse can so consistently be on song for race after race, at different tracks, different distances, coherent going, left handed or right handed. Such a durable, consistent and versatile horse.

17 grade 1 chases, 13 wins, 1 second and 3 falls.
By:
CVByrne
When: 01 Oct 10 10:17
* coherent going= different going,

error caused swype on my galaxy s smartphone.
By:
rogerthebutler
When: 01 Oct 10 10:45
The other thing is that race distances (and therefore times) are more consistent these days.

Back in the good old days it would be '3 miles and about 1 furlong' etc, giving plenty of leeway for the Clerks of Courses to mess around with race distances.

They still have the same cavalier approach to race times and distances at Punchestown.
By:
Bobby Dazzler
When: 01 Oct 10 12:31
Hi Roger, I know a few officials in the BHA who would disagree entirely - the current attention to distances is negligible, and they think it needs urgent attention.
By:
Bobby Dazzler
When: 01 Oct 10 12:55
Hi CV - I have the first and second lap times for the last 30 Gold Cups, again they are remarkably consistent. I was an exponent of the fact that tactical speed impacted on time, but having spent several years trying to prove it concluded that it wasn't.

Take you example of Kauto - his three KG wins on good to soft were run in 6m 6s - 2006 / 6m 9s 2007 / 6m 7s 2010. His fastest time was on Gd / GS in 2008 when he clocked 5m 57s. Remarkably the going stick which I totally disregarded when introduced would tell us the ground in 2006 and 2007 was comparable, but faster in 2009. I say remarkably because that would fit with my visual impression having been there on all three days.

So how did Nacarat influence the result ?

I believe the answer is physical, the graded races throw together the best physical specimens capable of the best performances of that era. The issue for the horse is always how to maintian airflow, because the process of diffusing oxygen through the lungs into the bloodstream is vital to releasing energy in the muscles. When the horse reaches the limit of its capability to fuel the muscles it starts to tire and fade. Therefore what Nacarat acheived by going to fasr was taking those who laid up with the pace to the maximum of their capability at an earlier stage of the race with the result that they began to struggle a long way from home.

Kauto has a far superior ability in terms of his physical ability to maintain the fuel supply, and therfore was easily able to take advantage of the situation. Hence what you saw was a wider winning distance than would have been the case if the rest of the horses had run at a pace they were capable of sustaining. Therefore the impact of pace is only relevant to those horses who cannot maintain the required fuel supply, and not to the winner who was always superior.

To this extent the result was exaggerated - and for my money his performance against Our Vic and Exotic Dancer was his best KG run.
By:
R Carver
When: 01 Oct 10 12:56
Interesting point CVB - not sure the King George was run to suit Barbers or Nacarat tho, so it exaggerated KS superiority (tho his massive superiority is not in Q) tho i agree the way it was run did suit KS because he had the class to travel and stay.
By:
dananders
When: 01 Oct 10 13:51
bobby dazzler are kautos king georges not phenominal performances?
By:
dananders
When: 01 Oct 10 13:52
if yopu think not its far more moronic than any comment ive ever made on here
By:
CVByrne
When: 01 Oct 10 13:52
I totally agree the winning distance was exaggerated and hence the rating is incorrect and furthers my opinion that using this old rating system is fundamentally flawed. I also believe that awarding IC a 185 on the back of defeating Denman by 7 lengths is wrong. On that basis Denman ran within 4lbs of his career best that day, which given his two other runs this year is certainly wife of the mark.

I think the rating and handicap system is outdated and ineffectual. A simple analysis of the average sp of all handicap winners can point to this.

It also raises the question of how good a horse really is and if a high rating awarded to a horse giving weight and a beating to inferior rivals is the same as a horse wining a grade 1 chase.

Take a grade 1 chase with a horse with tactical speed. Ideally the jockey wants to have the horse positioned close up to the leader before the last or second last and to deliver a finishing kick to win the race. The rating the horse is assigned for this win is based of the distance he won by. The margin of victory is determined by the point at which the finishing kick was delivered by the jockey. If a jockey made the run for home say at 4 out he may well run the risk of the horse tiring before the line or he may win by a larger margin. So since the main goal is to win the race trying to put up a high rating would be counter productive on that front.

It is telling that in the 2009 gold cup ruby said his plan was to follow neptune collonges over the second last but kauto "took him there" after the 4th last amd only denman could live with him. The rating  and performance that day was only a result of the horse making the decision and not the jockey. A similar thing happened at kempton last year, the race happened and ruby was required to do nothing but shake the reins after the 2nd last.

It begs the question, exactly how good is a horse who does not run in handicaps? So how good was best mate?
By:
dananders
When: 01 Oct 10 13:54
dont think theres anything exaggerated about it just that hes unstoppable at kempton . they all ran there races bar imperial
By:
CVByrne
When: 01 Oct 10 13:55
*wife = wide,

smartphone again, it ain't so smart is it?
By:
rogerthebutler
When: 01 Oct 10 14:24
Bobby Dazzler Joined: 04 Feb 03
Replies: 191 01 Oct 10 13:31   


Hi Roger, I know a few officials in the BHA who would disagree entirely - the current attention to distances is negligible, and they think it needs urgent attention.


Intersting stuff BD

I made my comment off the back of compiling my own speed ratings for over ten years (I ed to have that thing they all rabbit on about. What is it? Oh yes 'a life' I think it's called)and in general there are less 'what the hell time is that' moments for courses in more recent years than there were back in the day.

However, there are courses where the official race times are always pretty much fictitious, with Punchestown being the worst of the lot.
By:
Bobby Dazzler
When: 01 Oct 10 16:00
Hi Cv - It is all about opinions and we simply differ here. As i stated I spent years studying the issue of tactical speed - eventually I arrived at the point where I started to ask why if this is an issue why are all of the times in the top grade 1s so closely matched, and even more significantly remain so when split into races run on comparative going. And why is this especially true at Cheltenham ?

I have never owned a horse with a finishing kick over a jumps distance - and I don't believe I ever will. Horses never operate within a comfort zone when galloping, there metabolism is working at maximum capacity to maintain the movement required. A champion racehorse is a delicate piece of machinery - he has a respiratory system capable of introducing oxygen to the lungs at a rapid rate, a set of lungs able to diffuse that oxygen to blood stream and a heart able to pump the blood around his body at a rate sufficient to allow the oxygen to transfer to the muscles and fuel the movement required to maintain his pace. In reverse he has to have a system capable of taking the waste carbon dioxide into the blood stream from the muscles, diffusing back through the membrane into the lungs and expelling it. When he is galloping he is breathing in time to his stride, so he is performing this process two and a half times a second.

The superior horse is able to maintain this process for a longer period, hence a further distance. Ultimately the limits on performance are physical, as in graded races horses are always giving maximum effort and operating to the limit of their abilities the results you get are remarkably consistent. That appears to be true regardless of the early or late speed, as a horse giving its all is doing simply that and the horse with the greater physical capability will succeed. 

At Cheltenham all horses will be pushed to the limit of their capability, the nature of the course and the intensity of the competition guarantees this - hence the reason I believe that in the GC the horses can always be split into three groups, those who have proved they can reach the standard required to win a gold cup, those who have proved the cannot, and those whose ability has still to be established.
By:
Bobby Dazzler
When: 01 Oct 10 16:01
Roger - Lingfield was always my nightmare
By:
Pleasegivemeanailedontip
When: 03 Oct 10 17:07
Another Long Run thread goes off topic!

Can't understand this fellas price for the Ryanair. Recent entries have been made up of has-beens, slow 2 milers or up-and-comings who arent ready to win over 3 miles. It may have been recently upgraded but it dont look like a grade one to me yet. Win, lose or fall in the preps, why would he go Feltham-RSA-KG-Ryanair?
With natural improvement this season he looks like a lively gold cup outsider. Has already shown maturity for a young horse. If they want to save him a bit (and especially if its wet in march) then the champion chase looks far too winable to be thinking about the Ryanair. imo.
By:
Brooksielad
When: 03 Oct 10 23:24
Was it the triumph hurdle ran at a stupidly fast pace... and yet because of that it was a slow time. Why do people think fast early pace mean fast times :S ?
By:
Giddy
When: 06 Oct 10 22:05
The Paddy Power is Long Runs first major target and Whaley Cohen rides already
By:
Me2
When: 15 Jan 11 17:56
ttt
By:
Me2
When: 15 Jan 11 18:05
Sorry chaps.  I took this to the top, before I read it, in the belief that it was a Long Run thread.
Page 3 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com