Australian
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 245 comments are related to the topic:
New site for laying horses or dogs in Aust.
New site for laying horses or dogs in Aust.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 245
|
By:
who am i then lickmyballs...........maybe just a little hint
|
|
By:
No fun in that 3041
|
|
By:
once you get used to the interface its pretty easy and straight forward, I too during the trial bets backed horses I wanted to lay, but they ended up winning.
last night I layed 23 succesful lays in a row, tonight I am about 12 in a row. |
|
By:
Be careful. He will come back full of venom and vitriol
pleeaasse Sol, VENOM, thats a bit over the top isnt it i actually thought this debate has some merit, so i'm not allow to give my findings or opinions? VITRIOL...........surely a strong arguement doesnt carry this unfair banner and overthetop....LV doesnt have bookies it has Casino's and they are not allow to bet foreign citzens over the internet or telephones. The US doesnt bet foreign citizens over the net in any shape or form, thus they can adhere to the WTO edict to enforce that foreign bookies are not allow to bet their citizens |
|
By:
close lickballs,...........so u have me an a disadvantage then. so why not stop hiding behind your anonymity and give me a clue to your ID
|
|
By:
Because my ID has absolutely nought to do with you drowning in your (again) misplaced arguments.
You've addressed a couple of posters yet chosen to neglect my 26 Feb 13 09:38 post and the question it asks. And don't even get me started on your misplaced belief that the internet did not exist in Australia in 1992. Remember (yet another) furphy you swore was true....? |
|
By:
ok let me get back to u on that................... just a little bit frightened to reveal your self maybe?........not to worry then.
|
|
By:
Talk me through this one then, slowly, for I am slightly less evolved than you almighty great one -
was it this post then??? |
|
By:
lickballs regarding the internet thingy
http://www.rogerclarke.com/II/OzIHist.html |
|
By:
Regarding the internet thingy???
Starts off "positively" from your point of view I guess - "The first draft of this paper was cobbled together from unreliable memories..." "My Declaration of Interest below states that I bring no special authority to the writing of this paper..." "And the expression, and the inevitable errors of commission and omission, are those of myself alone!!!" And then finally - "I am assured by Ian Peter, Pegasus Networks' foundation CEO, that it offered public dialup access to the Internet in Australia, commencing in June 1989 with local access, and moving to nationwide access from 14 September 1989. It operated initially from Byron Bay, and later from Brisbane. It used UUCP and TCP/IP connections to exchange mail and newsgroups with the Internet, initially via direct dialup to USA, and later via ACSNet. " Just give up now, you're getting sadder and sadder... |
|
By:
glad to see u read it.......
|
|
By:
ive got u on a string haven't I ????
|
|
By:
Yep, you're right, you've really got me hooked.
If by "on a string" you mean you spout waffle about the WTO and International Trade Tribunals yet dodge questioning about why Betfair Aust can't offer in-running, online - flying in the face of your waffle. If by "on a string" you mean you decree 'Australia didn't have the internet in 1992', then post some useless link which invalidates your initial claim. Yes, you sad @rseclown, you've really got me. |
|
By:
Has anyone referred anyone else and recieve dthe $500 per refrrer lay bonus they offer?? I have referred 2 ppl who have done the trial deposited money and now have an active acc, but haven't got any dep bonus yet??
|
|
By:
You used to be a very agreeable chap Loggy now wherever I go I find you locked in bitter feuds on the forum. What happened to you MAAAAAAaaaaan????
|
|
By:
I think he is bobbygirl actually
|
|
By:
not at all DA, still the lay back hippie u know. just have to deal with a few troll lurkers swooping in to contribute nothing but negative bile
|
|
By:
Right now, and most days I am now on 32% above home tote for horses
|
|
By:
FCUK THIS FCUKING FORUM BETFAIR.
under 5.00, and 75% above highest tote for the rest. Anybody else experiencing the same thing? |
|
By:
Tourettes?
|
|
By:
No. Just sick of half your post not being posted and having to type it out again.....
|
|
By:
I made my first withdrawl yesterday, and the money was in my bank account this morning.
Have not had a problem in the six weeks I've been using the site. |
|
By:
I am now at:
HomeToteOdds5.00 LayOdds = (highestTote-1)* 1.92 + 1 rotflmfao But apart from that, yeah no problems. Made plenty of withdrawals (plenty of deposits too). Apart from the odds now being nearly all triple figures, no drama...  |
|
By:
This withdrawal feature, is this common with all bookies?
|
|
By:
Most don't allow it, if it becomes too consistent.
|
|
By:
Account holders please advise ---
If I were to deposit 1000 and receive 700 'free' lay bets, then lay something at $10 net to lose the 1700 .. I presume my account balance would then be approx 1170 - not 1870 .. That is what they mean by 'stake out' free lay bet - correct ???? Many thanks if you can clarify. |
|
By:
Correct Trotman.
You don't get to keep the stake from any free bet. Also the maximum free bet was $100, on the trots. |
|
By:
What? No. Of course you keep the stake from the free bets, the stake is the win.
With the free lay bets, actually what happens is this. You only get 70% bonus on amounts above 200. So if you were to deposit 1000, you would only get (1000-200)*.7, or 560 in free lay bets. That amount is purely liability. Your numbers are pretty correct in that you understand potential winnings, but laying 1700 at 11.00 means you of course are staking 170 dollars. If that horse loses, you win that 170, which is your stake. You of course lose 2.9% of that in charges, and don't get any bonus on your initial 200 deposit, but pretty close. |
|
By:
Best way to do it, is to lay a shorty. As that opens up the amount the free bet is actually worth.
Laying the 700 at 1.50 for example, obviously opens you up to a 1400 dollar payout using leverage on the free bet. The longer the odds, the less of the amount you keep. |
|
By:
They must have you down as a mug, BJT, and let you keep your stake, knowing it's just a matter of time.
 |
|
By:
Just a matter of time? rotflmfao. When they limit your betting, there really is no time for them to get anything back.
|
|
By:
In the last few days I've had my laying limit reduced to $1200. A bit disappointing but I will adapt.
The positive is that I've withdrawn $5k in three lots and each time the money was in my bank the next day. Has anyone else had their limit reduced. I would imagine the limit on the gallops would be a lot higher. |
|
By:
had an account for about 6wks
had 3 withdrawls also in my bank next day started on a limit of 2k still have the same limit 2k |
|
By:
I found tonight, that my laying limit has been further reduced to $600. Looks like the party may be over.
 |
|
By:
Yeah mine was reduced. They have changed their system a little over the last week or so. I am still looking at around 91% over highest tote as my lay odds, and also have the same 1200 limit, which seems to get knocked back, and often end up not being allowed on at all.
Would be worth shooting them an email though to see if that is what is supposed to be happening. |
|
By:
just changed my limits from 2k to $1k
|
|
By:
I think we have worn them down, Elsu.
|
|
By:
Yep reduced here down to 1200 then down to 120 in the one day. I asked why they said i was laying to close to jump. Wasn't an issue previous few weeks. There is value with them in most races not all but no use to me anymore unfortunately. I withdrew my balance and was in my account in 48 hours. Very unfortunate they had potential to be a keeper
|
|
By:
i'd have no problem referring others and was about to do so when my limits were cut.
|
|
By:
it was only a matter of time before economics created a reality in Vanuatu. They can only bleed money on a poor business model for so long.
|