Your Competitions
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
29 Dec 15
13:18
Joined:
Date Joined:
10 Jan 07
Are all 18 above you ?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 77
|
By:
If they weren't they are now
 |
|
By:
All. It is something we need to take a look at.
mini - I have sent you a PM, I await your reply  |
|
By:
Replies (18) surely ?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
What did the OP say on the matter ?
|
|
By:
Probably included the f word. Most of his posts do. I did see it but can't remember tbh.
|
|
By:
The OP in typically polite language suggested that the mini me camp should consider forming their own league, ...off elsewhere I recall.
|
|
By:
Cheers, I doubt any comments would have been made at all if the selections had been different horses.
|
|
By:
That was the situation until back end of December.
|
|
By:
Guys in his opening post Norfolk was simply explaining the unfortunate situation with in-breeding that he's had to live with all his life, and the fact that every day he has difficulty counting all mini me's selections on his webbed fingers and toes.
That was pretty much all he said really. |
|
By:
He should find it easy as he has 12 fingers on each hand.
Or so DICKIE BIRD told me. |
|
By:
madhatter • January 5, 2016 10:58 PM GMT
I definitely think mini me should be asked to explain why he always posts for so many people. Who are all these people?! - they obviously don't all pick their own horses or they wouldn't all end up with the same selection every day. Is it just one person with 18 accounts? Or do they all live in the same house or attend the same classes at school or live in a commune? Happy If you don't post for yourself then you should lose a pound or use a grace day. ... the rest is off-subject but can be viewed on the Div 3 thread |
|
By:
The op certainly has a point.In my view this competition should be individuals and not teams playing against each other.An opening 12/1 winner for a stable of 6 names effectively kills that month's competition for everyone else.
|
|
By:
Good morning, still waiting for a reply from mini me.
|
|
By:
I see Reged has asked for opinions so I will give mine
Each individual goes about it differently picking a selection on roughly a daily basis, & that to me is the crux of the matter, it should be an individual comp one person picking a selection, ok some people may have more than one user name & may decide to post with more than one name, well that is ok to a point but at least the selections are usually different, I suspect some people have multiple user names which to me devalues the comp to a point & if this is then abused by selecting the same horse in the same division so when six becomes one its really making a mockery of the whole comp, has Mini Me lost interest or maybe has possible time restraints either way posting for 18 supposed different players is not really in the spirit of the comp. |
|
By:
A thought occurs. Presumably these are all separate identities so what's to prevent someone logging-in and out 18 times and posting the same nap for each identity? Would be entirely within the rules and difficult to query.
|
|
By:
Good morning
|
|
By:
is that it mm?
 |
|
By:
I am considering posting 18 non triers
|
|
By:
skinto will be pleased
|
|
By:
I will be seriously impressed if all 18 ever end up in the Premiership at the same time!
Good luck mini me  PS You know, I'm starting to think TheNorfolkMafia is a bit of troublemaker! |
|
By:
perish the thought!
|
|
By:
Good afternoon
|
|
By:
Sorry - failed. A non trier just won.........................
|
|
By:
Must have been a skinto lay.
|
|
By:
Darn these non-jiggers. Just can't rely on them
 |
|
By:
Take a look at today's Division Two table!
Oh, by the way, my OP read, Only 18 selections from the 'mini me' stable today! Why don't you f*ck off and start your own division? |
|
By:
'the rest is off subject but can be viewed on Div 3' ....can it bollocks...it was there but has been removed.....by whom?
|
|
By:
madhatter, paranoia is getting the better of you ... I have replied on the Weds Div 3 thread
 |
|
By:
reged....it is not there...........
|
|
By:
oh yes it is ... oh no it isn't ... oh ... I'm in the wrong job!
|
|
By:
Just don't mention James or Holly in your posts
 |
|
By:
W*******y ?
|
|
By:
Hello TheNorfolkMafiaman. I hope you are well and Happy New Year!
Did you back it? Photo finish but it doesn't matter how they win... |
|
By:
I will add my bit to the debate - I've just posted this on the Div 2 thread:
Ive seen the recent posts which subject to clarification at the first sight would appear to be multiple selections by the same person with differing user names. Apart from not being in the spirit of the competition it does seem pointless - it's not as if there is any prize money at stake. Looking at the table as it stands now - What happens if the poster picks say another 5/1 winner - the monthly competition is as good as over for everyone else providing he gets say a break even return for the end of the month. I'm not at the stage of throwing my toys out of the pram, but anyone knows how difficult it is to move through divisions and I feel for anyone getting relegated whilst such posting takes place. As a minimum I would stop the use of posting for someone else if you've got access problems you've got the 5 grace days that help - if he then has to log in 18 times ( allegedly ) he must be one sad person. |
|
By:
I'm totally baffled by it all!
|
|
By:
hoof hearted...i've just had a look at the div2 table and it is a ridiculous situation.A solution might be to have a rule that anyone posting more than one selection must select different horses.
|
|
By:
Looking at what has been said by many I feel it may be the way forward to limit (somehow) how many names one napster can post for.
|
|
By:
it has really been sparked by mm extracting el urine ... if he would only play to the spirit of the comp and mix it up a bit I don't suppose there would be a problem. Surprised he can't see that TBH
|