Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Jason Bourne
14 Mar 10 22:27
Joined:
Date Joined: 12 Jan 09
| Topic/replies: 21,982 | Blogger: Jason Bourne's blog
Dream is over :(
Show More
Loading...
Report Hami March 14, 2010 9:43 PM GMT
hel be there
Report Win only - Sp only March 14, 2010 10:08 PM GMT
finnish
Report SuperSuperShire March 14, 2010 10:30 PM GMT
good
Report ALLWEATHERKING March 15, 2010 7:08 AM GMT
Seriously GREAT NEWS for England. Becks way past best, adds nothing to England other than a sideshow distraction.
Report Ace High March 15, 2010 8:56 AM GMT
England cant win the world cup without Beckham.

Youre a goddam fool if you think otherwise.
Report ALLWEATHERKING March 15, 2010 9:32 AM GMT
you know nothing aces high
Report Graveyboat2 March 15, 2010 11:59 AM GMT
clueless all weather
Report happyhammer March 15, 2010 12:19 PM GMT
Ace High 15 Mar 09:56


England cant win the world cup without Beckham.

Youre a goddam fool if you think otherwise.

Oh yes I forgot about all his great performances in previous world cups. Least the fools who know nothing about football will be able to convince themselves now we would have won it if only Beckham was fit.
Report Graveyboat2 March 15, 2010 12:40 PM GMT
happy hammer - we wont win wc most england fans know that but we have more chance with Beckham than with the likes of swp or walcott
Report ALLWEATHERKING March 15, 2010 12:45 PM GMT
correct happyhammer ;)
Report ALLWEATHERKING March 15, 2010 12:47 PM GMT
gravey you know nothing
Report Graveyboat2 March 15, 2010 12:49 PM GMT
yeah Beckham not been great in previous wc but then again not many england players can claim they have been - Beckham would provide vital quality from set pieces and from his crossing ability - swp and walcott would provide us with nothing.
Report Graveyboat2 March 15, 2010 12:51 PM GMT
all weathering - any manager in the world would have taken Beckham, but your probably right.
Report ALLWEATHERKING March 15, 2010 3:27 PM GMT
gravey.

you seem to believe that its a straight choice between beckham or swp/walcott.

Thats nonsense.

Beckham would def not have been a starter in the WC, he would have been used as a sub, being brought on for the last 20 mins.

Capello will not lose a seconds sleep over Becks injury, in fact it will make theings a lot clearer for him.

Oh and youre wrong when you say that 'any manager in the world would have taken Beckham'. He wouldnt get in the squads of any of the top 6, poss 10 nations imo.

Way way past his best, gravey.
Report kincsem March 15, 2010 4:35 PM GMT
Beckham has been walking about the pitch for the last five or six years. He was never going to be a full 90 minute squad member, and even 20 minutes is too much for him now imo.

Gerrard and Terry also out would be good.

Young guys are needed.
Report PierreLaRogue March 15, 2010 5:28 PM GMT
Good job, best news England could have, dont need him never did, he takes focus away from the team.
Report all over March 15, 2010 9:48 PM GMT
england have no chance
Report chop180 March 15, 2010 10:12 PM GMT
Can any of you idiots who think beckham would make such a difference explain why the odds haven't changed a jot since the news broke?

And whilst your at it, maybe explain why this tournament would have been so much different from the crap displays he's put in at all the other finals he's been at?
Report sirchristie March 16, 2010 12:06 AM GMT
anyone laying at current odds must be happy whatever as they cant win no matter who gets on the plane
Report PierreLaRogue March 16, 2010 4:57 PM GMT
The only decent chance we had in recent world cup's he ruined when he got sent off, ever since then its been the beckham show. Now he's crying like a baby because he cant go, he's a bloody pansy no wonder Fergie couldnt stand him.
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com