Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Jason Bourne
14 Mar 10 22:27
Joined:
Date Joined: 12 Jan 09
| Topic/replies: 21,982 | Blogger: Jason Bourne's blog
Dream is over :(

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 20
By:
Hami
When: 14 Mar 10 22:43
hel be there
By:
Win only - Sp only
When: 14 Mar 10 23:08
finnish
By:
SuperSuperShire
When: 14 Mar 10 23:30
good
By:
ALLWEATHERKING
When: 15 Mar 10 08:08
Seriously GREAT NEWS for England. Becks way past best, adds nothing to England other than a sideshow distraction.
By:
Ace High
When: 15 Mar 10 09:56
England cant win the world cup without Beckham.

Youre a goddam fool if you think otherwise.
By:
ALLWEATHERKING
When: 15 Mar 10 10:32
you know nothing aces high
By:
Graveyboat2
When: 15 Mar 10 12:59
clueless all weather
By:
happyhammer
When: 15 Mar 10 13:19
Ace High 15 Mar 09:56


England cant win the world cup without Beckham.

Youre a goddam fool if you think otherwise.

Oh yes I forgot about all his great performances in previous world cups. Least the fools who know nothing about football will be able to convince themselves now we would have won it if only Beckham was fit.
By:
Graveyboat2
When: 15 Mar 10 13:40
happy hammer - we wont win wc most england fans know that but we have more chance with Beckham than with the likes of swp or walcott
By:
ALLWEATHERKING
When: 15 Mar 10 13:45
correct happyhammer ;)
By:
ALLWEATHERKING
When: 15 Mar 10 13:47
gravey you know nothing
By:
Graveyboat2
When: 15 Mar 10 13:49
yeah Beckham not been great in previous wc but then again not many england players can claim they have been - Beckham would provide vital quality from set pieces and from his crossing ability - swp and walcott would provide us with nothing.
By:
Graveyboat2
When: 15 Mar 10 13:51
all weathering - any manager in the world would have taken Beckham, but your probably right.
By:
ALLWEATHERKING
When: 15 Mar 10 16:27
gravey.

you seem to believe that its a straight choice between beckham or swp/walcott.

Thats nonsense.

Beckham would def not have been a starter in the WC, he would have been used as a sub, being brought on for the last 20 mins.

Capello will not lose a seconds sleep over Becks injury, in fact it will make theings a lot clearer for him.

Oh and youre wrong when you say that 'any manager in the world would have taken Beckham'. He wouldnt get in the squads of any of the top 6, poss 10 nations imo.

Way way past his best, gravey.
By:
kincsem
When: 15 Mar 10 17:35
Beckham has been walking about the pitch for the last five or six years. He was never going to be a full 90 minute squad member, and even 20 minutes is too much for him now imo.

Gerrard and Terry also out would be good.

Young guys are needed.
By:
PierreLaRogue
When: 15 Mar 10 18:28
Good job, best news England could have, dont need him never did, he takes focus away from the team.
By:
all over
When: 15 Mar 10 22:48
england have no chance
By:
chop180
When: 15 Mar 10 23:12
Can any of you idiots who think beckham would make such a difference explain why the odds haven't changed a jot since the news broke?

And whilst your at it, maybe explain why this tournament would have been so much different from the crap displays he's put in at all the other finals he's been at?
By:
sirchristie
When: 16 Mar 10 01:06
anyone laying at current odds must be happy whatever as they cant win no matter who gets on the plane
By:
PierreLaRogue
When: 16 Mar 10 17:57
The only decent chance we had in recent world cup's he ruined when he got sent off, ever since then its been the beckham show. Now he's crying like a baby because he cant go, he's a bloody pansy no wonder Fergie couldnt stand him.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com