|
By:
Good luck. Let's hope we both win.
|
|
By:
Hmmm. Might have to skip woodine. Not sure I can process that many horses in 9 minutes. lol
|
|
By:
Another concern for 5 is Bruce Levine's poor record with 6 month + layoffs, but I still think it's fit. There's a little bit of value at 2.9 imo. Small bet.
|
|
By:
if this goes wrong, i will need a lie down anyway
![]() |
|
By:
haha
|
|
By:
BOOOOM
|
|
By:
wd
![]() |
|
By:
:D :D Thanks. Well done you too.
|
|
By:
Are you continuing then?
|
|
By:
think so, depending on what comes up, once it gets to penn you'll get better opinions than mine anyway, if you are still about
|
|
By:
I'm going to look at the next at LAD and BEL.
|
|
By:
I'll be betting Penn. I like it. You mean other people will appear that will have good opinions? Do you not like Penn?
|
|
By:
both of the above, i think my issues with penn are due to me losing concentration, getting carried away etc.
|
|
By:
people will swear they could make a living on penn alone..
|
|
By:
To be honest, I think the likes of Penn / MNR / CT produce some weird results. This is the thing with class C meetings, but I think I have a way of exploiting this.
|
|
By:
Hmmm, I do like Penn a lot. Interesting that people would say that.
|
|
By:
everyone has courses they are more comfortable with, i know that i am more interested in the stuff that is on in the early evening uk time, because htat's when i'm usually able to have a gamble and watch the races. the days of staying up till 3 am chasing at charlsetown are a rarity for me theses days. though when one is up it is hard to stop
|
|
By:
LAD
2 at 20.0 7 at 90.0. Good barn change. 8 at 100.0. Could improve second time back off layoff. |
|
By:
hahah, I've had so many late nights doing this. I know where you're coming from.
|
|
By:
Backed 2 again at 26.0.
|
|
By:
might as well join you and lay the 3 at lad in that case then, gl
|
|
By:
Glad to have you on board. Good luck.
|
|
By:
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM
|
|
By:
Heart's pounding like crazy after that. What a wiiiiin !!!!
|
|
By:
VWD you deserved that
|
|
By:
you have found the value!
|
|
By:
Aftertiming, but I got it at 110. YEEEEEESSS
|
|
By:
ahahahhaa think I got the value that time! LOL Maybe the staking wasn't right! hahahaha
|
|
By:
Actually, the staking was good because I backed it at 70.0. Then backed it again when it drifted to 110.
|
|
By:
even if you got it at 28.0 it was value, hard to top that
|
|
By:
Yeah, it was crazy. Why lay something that's shown so much pace before on its second time out off a layoff in a piss-poor field at 110.0 just because it's had one bad race!!
|
|
By:
think my best ever is 78 in an exacta and i only had a couple of quid on it so that is v good going
|
|
By:
it's betfairs bots laying this **** most of the time but they are making so much money now they dn't care
|
|
By:
Thanks a lot mate. That's my best win ever, so you had the privilege of witnessing it. 78.0 in an exacta is awesome too.
|
|
By:
Ahhh really? Ah well glad it probably wasn't a member of the general public on the other end of that.
Riiiigght.. Penn! |
|
By:
PEN R1
3 at 1.4 to place. Think this will be tough to displace. Pace tends to hold up well at Penn. |
|
By:
at 110 i doubt it.. well if they are, they certainly aren't posting on here
![]() |
|
By:
hahahah. I've layed horses at that price. Didn't win much!
|
|
By:
Yeah, I'd be shy about posting that!
|
|
By:
Are you looking at Penn?
|