|
By:
carlos- do you have a fetish for cut and paste other peoples posts?
you presence here is pointless. fk off back to the boxing forum. btw- you failed to provide the proof of me on the boxing forum. your credibility is zero. |
|
By:
do you have a fetish for cut and paste other peoples posts
As opposed from cutting & pasting from CNBC? ![]() your credibility is zero As opposed to your sub-zero credibility? ![]() |
|
By:
melly- when will you retract you claim that bill gross does not appear on cnbc?
about the same time you admit your hyperinflation claim is another failure |
|
By:
when will you retract you claim that bill gross does not appear on cnbc
You are an idiot. Where did I post that he "does not appear on cnbc"? I was laughing at the turd you dropped calling him a "big time contributor" I'm starting to think calling you a clown is flattering you. |
|
By:
and of course- you were wrong.
good consistency melly.you maintain your 100% record. |
|
By:
Post where I said he "does not appear on cnbc" and shut me up.
Otherwise the whole forum knows that your clothes caught fire while trying to set that strawman ablaze. Eeeer, forget that last paragraph, waaay over your head, I have to keep things "clown simple". |
|
By:
you just had your a$$ handed to you on a plate melly.How many times is it this week?
what a fkkn loser |
|
By:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() You should have posted nothing in response. Perhaps some braindead zombie reading this exchange would have given you the benefit of the doubt.......even at that, very unlikely though. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
no melly- you should cease to deny that you are a brainless twit.
everything you post here has been an EPIC FAIL. now you have revealed you can't afford pay tv. I guess theres no connection at the bedsit complex. ![]() |
|
By:
Okay, benny the clown, I got better things to do than wasting my time laughing on you on here.
Let's just say I'll file the "he doesn't appear on cnbc" in the same file as the 10 years wages trade you couldn't explain and call it even. Better start thinking about your joke routine tomorrow though. The stuff you put up today was hilarious. |
|
By:
Mrben 28 Jun 12 13:47
carlos- do you have a fetish for cut and paste other peoples posts? you presence here is pointless. fk off back to the boxing forum. btw- you failed to provide the proof of me on the boxing forum. your credibility is zero. That's exactly wat I mean. This responce just shows how thick u realy r. Y would I want to prove something uv already proved during the duration of this thread. On top of this u want me to prove summit which would be nearly impossible for me to do. But guess wat uv already done it. Lol. Iv said this before if u had a brain u would be dangerous. Thank god. |
|
By:
chatlame 27 Jun 12 22:56
He is not paid to run a school? And wat the f00k r u doing now eo, playing hide and seek. To all u thick people on here who think eo is winning this debate. Just think there's been 4 main posters on this thread eo, frog mc |
|
By:
carlos and melly have laid to rest any doubt they are complete morons.
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Mcben and melenius. 4 guys yeh.
Now look at the content carefuly, forget about how's writes better cus I couldn't give a to ss about that. It's clear cut melenius has been provided good info to support his arguments. Eo, frog and mcben have all been dazzled, once they get dazzled they say the same thing over and over again in different words of course : iv won the argument. Iv won this debate. 1 -0 to eo, 2-0 to frog etc etc. Then this idiot above has only joined 5 days ago, how on earth he found the trade section is beyond me nevermind shouting the same bull as these 3. Eo will again tell us it's chance or skill. But wen u join betfair most do it to gamble on sports or enter sports related discussions. What on earth is this idiot on about. Talk about shooting urself in the foot. Uv just bombed urself in the foot eo. Sowi. But once again uv destroyed everybody in all debates and arguments eo. I'll check ur bull5hit responce wen me got nought to do. Some of these Wimbledon matches r so f00kin 1sided. Wat is the point of showing matches which are 1/100 to start with |
|
By:
carlos- can you rewrite that post in english plz.??
|
|
By:
Eo if u played with urself I'm sure u would be far more satisfied then them 1-0 2-0 victories over melenius, and then of course u woke up and had ur cornflakes.
I'm sure u said England had a great chance of winning the cup, I think u went as far as saying this is the probably tge best England side uv ever seen. Did they beat Italy 1-0 and 2-0 just like u beat melenius by the same scoreline. God bless eo, chatlame or watever u decide to be |
|
By:
Mrben 28 Jun 12 13:47
carlos- do you have a fetish for cut and paste other peoples posts? you presence here is pointless. fk off back to the boxing forum. btw- you failed to provide the proof of me on the boxing forum. your credibility is zero. Y dnt u rewrite this in English. It makes no sence watsoever. U say u want proof, tell me how am I to provide u with this proof. Give me a start, I realy need ur professional help on this 1. Btw chatlame is realy starting to make some conservative points dnt u think. Maybe it is he, who is winning all the debates and arguments dnt u think. Btw have u had any bets today or in the past week. Screenshot em and I bet u I'll stake 10 times wat u 4 can stake. U heard right eo, that 1 is for u 4 chatlame, mcben and frogy. By the way eo how much did u win on the wlad v haye fight. Did u fill ur boots. Lol did yah. Lolllllllll |
|
By:
Carlos
I'm not ever about trying to score victories over Menelaus or anybody else on here ( even you). I just keep repeating that I think that Menelaus is a bit too extreme and absolute in his forecasts for my taste. That's all. I have often said he could be right in all he says, but that there are many other equally qualified other economic experts out there who disagree strongly with his extreme forecast of inevitable armageddon. He is a bit of a one trick pony imo. But that doesn't necessarily make him wrong or right. |
|
By:
Frogman, I am also becoming a 1 trick pony u thick idiot simply because u just dnt get it and we can't move on until u understand it.
See mate, u can't understand f00k all yet ur trying to teach me and mele who know far more than u ever will about this subject 1st of all u r trying to win or at least get an upperhand in this debate as u r obviously opposing mele and my views. If ur not trying to prove us wrong then ur more brain dead than I previously thought because it would be pointless Reading or posting on this thread. It's clear from the very start of this thread u and 3 others (obviously same person) believe mele and I r wrong. If we r wrong then u become right and therefore it's a moral victory right. Secondly mate mele has bought factual and relevant evidence from RELIABLE sources who generaly tend to be accurate when discussing similar topics. U on the other hand understand f00k all about f00k all and keep asking the same sh1ty question. Some of the so called top experts share your view, but guess war the guys that support ur views have been wrong on many many ocasions whilst discussing similar topics. Eg stop listening to the news. It's f00kin bull. U realy think they gona give u good financial advice on BBC, sky news etc. U realy think so. Lololol. Just like the BBC and sky news have cocked up up on every financial predication they have made in the last 15 years. That's right cocked up on every financial predication that matters for 15 straight years. F00ks man, and thickos like u think it's wise to back up ur sh1tty arguments by brining evidence from such sh1ty, already failed sources. Lololol think about it do u think they can f00k up for 15 straight years on things that matter yet they r always correct about 99% of the stuff u see yet all the stuff they r right about which is 99% of the time. They r only ever wrong less than 1% of the time, and it's always on things that matter. U think this is all by chance!!!!! N |
|
By:
Thanks for all that Carlos.
You obviously know your stuff ( your command on economics is clearly on a par with that of English language ) and I stand suitably reprimanded. I'm sure that Menelaus is glad to have you as a supporter and cheer leader. Btw I'm not much of a TV watcher, so I can't comment at all on your views of that media source for financial commentary and analysis. I suspect you may well be right on that point though. Care to tell me where you learnt your posting style. Very interesting but extremely difficult to read at times. |
|
By:
It's called the art of communication.
Ino u understand my post clearly yet ur trying to divert away from the subject in hand. Let's be honest about this now, if ur up for a debate, u must bring strong evidence to support ur argument. U have failed to do this throughout the thread, yet eo and mcben keep stating how u have destroyed melenius which couldn't be further from the truth. By the way say hello to to eo while ur at it. In other words hello urself. Still waiting for ur barristor screenshots eo, it's been over 2 years now my friend |
|
By:
Carlos
Take it easy with the cocain, you are incredible paranoid. Menelaus Try to look at your self from another person's point of view. |
|
By:
Carlos
I have said many times that I do not have the credentials to debate anybody on here on economic theory, let alone Menelaus. All I bring to the debate is a bit of sideline commensense. Which is that the points of conclusion that Menelaus claims are absolute and irrefutable are nothing of the sort. If you think I need to produce detailed evidence to say that, I respond by saying just read any decent, independent article on the matters in question. They usually quote from many credible sources including but not limited to many of the world's leading economists. There is general agreement on the scale and type of problem, but not all that much consensus on either how to treat it or if and when it will be satisfactorily resolved. And I don't mean just watch Sky/Fox news channels to get your inputs. |
|
By:
Tbh iv not realy read ur posts at all.
Iv just realised I might have made a mistake, and ur not eo as I had first assumed. I just read part of his post. Most of the time this guy has plenty of usernames. So down to economics, polticsetc etcetc economics is the simplest subject to understand. And tbh even though I have studied economics to a certain degree I study it no longer. It's just too easy and there's nothing to it apart from loopholes and bull5hit. To prosper u have to be part of the system. So after 100 posts WTF are melenius and eo on about???????? 1 simple question?????????????? The rich are getting richer, and the poor are getting poorer????? Melenius is saying in plain and simple English the majority of people (in uk and west) are gonna get scre wed. By that he means gona get poorer. The majority equals (99%). This will lead to a total f00k up where u may see some lethal riots geza. Much worse than last summer. In the process the rich will obviously make a few extra get, a firmer grip on power and f00k all else. Obviously people in power abuse it. But unlike in the movies James bond ain't gona pop up. After that f00keries all the way. Wen will this happen. From wat I can grasp, melenius says it will take place in the near future. In years 10-35 years. Maybe inside 10 years. Ask melenius????? He should know wat he thinks!!! Eo, the retired grandad thinks not. He thinks nothing of the sort will happen. Well it might happen but it ain't gona be the bad. Well it could be bad but where's the evidence. Oh right u got me on that 1 so I'll ask u so e other bull5hit question. And wat the f00k am I saying, I'm chatin bull, take a rest and come back tommorow and chat some more bull. I'm losing tge argument but am succeeding in wasting peoples time. And guess wat frog is on my side. More reason to continue. Iv got fans. I'm in my arm chair with a cigar stuck up my a ss, I can't even watch eastenders cause I ain't paid my bills but I'll go on as long as people like frog support me. Support my view. It's my only hope. I'd say that's a prety fair reflection of the 100 or so posts. Would u agree??? Hope it heps mr frog. Sowi if I eva offended yah |
|
By:
You are completely crazy, Carlos(a compliment)!
|
|
By:
I like crazy persons.
|
|
By:
FineAs
I'm afraid you would be sadly disappointed if a genuine economist came on and tried to debate with menelaus. It would follow the same path as all his other discussions. Economics isn't a science irrespective of the efforts of those who try to bring the methods used in science to prove their hypotheses. There is no smoking gun in economics. There is no equivalent of proof that the earth revolves around the sun. Having said that lets not put scientists on a pedestal. Their proof often only lasts as long as it takes for another scientist to come along and disprove their theory and place another one in the scientific communitiies and by extension publics consciousness. That is the history of scientific advancement. Which is how your question about why so many eminent economists hold such radically different views. The closest you will get to certainty is deductive logic flowing from what little we know or know not to be the case. In the meantime old Melly will continue to waffle and baffle with bullshiit on here instead of going to a genuine economics forum because at such a place he would be laughed out of town for the reasons I have given on this thread and for his laughable straw man arguments and attempts at obfuscation. |
|
By:
YOU. ARE. TRYING. TOO. HARD.
apparently he is completely unaware of the concept of irony |
|
By:
What a fraud. A complete charlatan. Not interested in the least in the exchange of ideas and furtherance of collective wisdom.
contacting my lawyers ![]() hopefully they won't have caught wind of this massive inflation which menelaus predicted we would currently be experiencing..... |
|
By:
I still would like to see some heavyweight theoretical dismantling of at least some of the actual deductions/forecasts he posts as being certain and non- debatable.
his inflation forecast (which admittedly had to be pieced together from numerous evasive posts in which he tried ever so hard to avoid being pinned down to a prediction with the type of childish misdirection he is using here to avoid answering eo) turned out to be plain wrong. so whatever the theory (and it has never been clearly laid out) it certainly doesn't lead to infallible predictions. which leads one to wonder why he could be so sure of the end game. or rather it would if it weren't so palpable from his style and attitude that he is a blustering egomaniac. |
|
By:
Funny how all these people post as soon as eo the man himself starts to post.
U know f00k all about eo. If u did u would have so many usernames supporting u, chatin the same bull as u do. Inflation has already stopped alot of working class people doing things they us2 to do (clubs, pubs, etc), buying things they us2 buy (****, eating out). Inflation had crept up upon us without us even knowing. Longer working hours, less pay, higher prices on everything u realy need. And guess wat it's getting worse. So wat on earth r u on about using ur big long bull5hit words. Can I suggest uv confused urself. |
|
By:
If ever you needed proof as to Melly's idiocy it arrives in the above bag of piss jumping onto his nut sack and holding on for dear life. Carlos, the idiots idiot. Still clinging on to the bizarre notion that anybody who disagrees with Melly's wild ramblings must by definition be myself posting under different user names.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I wouldn't mind being a fly on the wall in their room at the asylum as they fight over whose turn it is to wear the straightjacket. |
|
By:
Carlos
Either one of two things is happening here for sure. Either, as you say, I'm running around furiously inventing new user names in a desperate attempt to discredit the inellectual titan that is Melly or everybody but you is seeing through his bullshiit. Of course I'm betting on you and Melly now you have joined forces and your collective IQ has doubled from two to four. ![]() |
|
By:
Hmmmm, I thought I cut the line......I better double check.
![]() |
|
By:
You supposedly did but then you ran up and down the river bank screaming for me to come back. I'm not an angler. Can you tell me if that is normal for fishermen?
|
|
By:
You put up practically a dozen posts without being able to provoke a response. I put up a single line without even mentioning your name and .....there you are.
![]() ![]() ![]() Pavlov called this reaction an "involuntary response". I just got you to start salivating in anticipation of something I conditioned you to think it's there but really is not. Thanks for playing. ![]() |
|
By:
is this the same menelaus who condemns other posters for just dropping in once in a while to post? hypocrite.
|
|
By:
Oh dear. The "great mathematician" in suddenly forgets how to count shocker.
Now what did I say? DANCE SUCKER. In the meantime I may or may not converse with those who can hold a conversation without being an obnoxious bellend and you can continue to talk to your friends. How is Colin The Rat? |
|
By:
Come on Menelaus.
Man up. Just admit to EO that you're a schnitzel lover and let's move on. Put on a little Strauss and dance with your wife and enjoy life a little more. |
|
By:
He likes the schnitzel?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |