Jan 26, 2018 -- 10:07AM, mesmerised wrote:

It's a tragedy for Tennis, because if Nadal and Novak run out of time, or injury succumbs them as it has during their careers, it means it's highly unlikely that before I die I would see the someone over take Fruaderer's inflated slam total, still, true connoisseurs of the sport, such as myself, understand his legacy is built around deception, smoke, mirrors, timing and a good PR machine, kind regards.

Jan 26, 2018 -- 7:37PM, mesmerised wrote:

tof you're obviously a sandwich short of a picnic whose posts I ignore 99% of the time because it's usually filled up with weird junk, my advice is to see a doctor because whatever the issue is, it's no small thing, Kind Regards.

Jan 27, 2018 -- 8:58AM, mesmerised wrote:

Woz tried batting off questions about being slamless pre match and said "I already have a place in history, I've been number 1, the best player in the world"It's this type of delusional nonsense that makes me want Halep to win, she was only number 1 because she played and vultured so many smaller tournaments and whilst Serena was off the scene, being number doesn't make you the best player in the world, it's just a title that is meaningless without winning a slam at any point.When people have conversations about past greats, number 1 ranked players are never mentioned unless they were slam winners as that's what is measured when comparing great players, the likes of like Rios, Jankovic or Safina would never be talked. Obviously winning 1 is not enough either, have to be a multiple slam winner.

agree mes

Jan 27, 2018 -- 9:04AM, tof wrote:

Servizio nervosa guacamole brain syndrome potentially up coming ...

however on the other hand