Tennis
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 472 comments are related to the topic:
ATP and WTA low odds gubbed list
ATP and WTA low odds gubbed list
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 472
|
By:
Giles Simon 1.01 (30+K) vs Donald Young 550 (6)
Simon was 2 sets up and 3-0, final score 6-2 6-4 4-6 4-6 4-6 |
|
By:
US Open Round 1 ^^^^^^
|
|
By:
Pironkova 1.01 v Barthel; Us Open Round 1.
|
|
By:
Krunic 1.03 vs Kovinic, USO R1
|
|
By:
LDL 1.08 vs Gibbs, USO R1
was 4*-1 in the decider |
|
By:
Doi 1.03/1.05 v Bencic; US Open Round 2. Bencic 1.01 first set winner market gubbed as well as she is a massive choker.
|
|
By:
what was Fish trading at?
|
|
By:
1.08 when serving for the match
|
|
By:
when 1.07 back, 1.08 lay for Fish. if you happened to have your money in the market already @ 1.07, you would have been matched because over 200k matched @ that price
|
|
By:
no point in having fish on the list he's hung up his racquet
 |
|
By:
out of interest what price was Bertens to win the 1st set v Williams when she was 4-0 up in the TB ?
|
|
By:
J Sock 1.02 v Bemelmans; retirement US Open Round 2.
|
|
By:
Hewitt 1.03 v Tomic; US Open Round 2.
|
|
By:
Nadal 1.01 v Fognini; the only time Nadal has lost from 2-0 up in a slam. US Open Round 3.
|
|
By:
Troicki 1.04 v D Young; came back from 2-0 down. US Open Round 3.
|
|
By:
Strycova 1.03 v Lisicki; served for the match twice back to back. US Open Round 3.
|
|
By:
massive choke from Strycova v lisicki. 5-1* in 3rd to 5-7 after a fake (imo) MTO from Lisicki at 5-1
|
|
By:
Djokovic Set 2 Winner 1.01 v Bautista Agut; US Open Round 4.
|
|
By:
Kvitova 1.04 v Pennetta from a set and a break; US Open Quarter Final.
|
|
By:
serena busted at 1.01. proving once again theres no such thing as free money
|
|
By:
1.02 £799,267
1.03 £734,691 1.04 £367,757 1.05 £1,293,454 1.06 £1,777,383 1.07 £1,979,939 1.08 £541,594 1.09 £326,654 1.1 £242,814 1.11 £132,410 1.12 £232,696 1.13 £487,594 1.14 £259,390 1.15 £436,130 Someone please explain to me how these backers A. feel right now B. come back from this C. sleep tonight D. feed there children e. ever bet again ? |
|
By:
im sure the big boys have the funds to recover. they arent concerned with a small fry like yourself mocking them when they lose. that seems to be all you do when your giro runs out every week after two days
|
|
By:
Well well well
look who it is.... Senyatta 03 Sep 15 15:04 Joined: 02 Apr 11 | Topic/replies: 879 | Blogger: Senyatta's blog ill give it a pop - will try to make 3k in one day:) 14k holland double chance at 1.08, 32k italy 1.07. easy to get these amounts on as they are big markets. best of luck to all my followers! What a tool S K I NT |
|
By:
atta boy. keep it up sir bond. you seem to miss the part where i said i wasnt putting any bets on and it was just a challenge while i was waiting for the OP to post his next bet. but what if i did back those bets? id be down 13k or thereabouts big deal. you havent a pot to piss in mate and you were likely sodomized as a child. thats the only explanation for your attention seeking dour demeanour. i wont address a loser like yourself again on here so go back to fapping on shemaletube and collecting the giro each week
ta |
|
By:
so why would anyone follow bets your weren't even putting on yourself
reason you didn't back that yourself is because you've never seen 13k in your life and if you had you would of lost it on probably the two worst bets in the history of Betfair |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Darlo Bantam 11 Sep 15 20:36 Joined: 27 Mar 07 | Topic/replies: 23,974 | Blogger: Darlo Bantam's blog
Sep 11, 2015 -- 8:24PM, Senyatta wrote: im sure the big boys have the funds to recover. they arent concerned with a small fry like yourself mocking them when they lose. that seems to be all you do when your giro runs out every week after two days That seems to be the entire point of this thread - and other similar gubbings threads we see countless times a day. Nobody barely ever congratulates those who back very long odds, people are just quick to poke fun at those who have lost No, the point of this thread is to help those of us see and spot players that are likely to choke in certain situations so please keep the arguing out of the thread and stick to just posting who got done at short odds. Thanks chaps  |
|
By:
Like I said before without context though that's almost irrelevant. No point laying someone who regular busts 1.10 if he plays lots of matches; rather than someone who busts 1.01 once every six months but it's the only time he hits 1.01. Without a full list of winning 1.01s, a list of losing 1.01s only tells half the picture.
|
|
By:
For example, this year Serena's slam record is 26-1. Anyone laying at above 1.04 every match is therefore theoretically out of pocket. So posting the figures above of 1.05 out to 1.15 is in the long run - for this year at least - theoretically pointless because they would be for the year overall losers.
|
|
By:
That is - as long as she hits 1.04 every time she wins. Which for Serena is nigh-on a certainty but some players won't be.
|
|
By:
Giles Simon
if you followed the thread you would of already been in pocket big time |
|
By:
Darlo Bantam 11 Sep 15 21:51 Joined: 27 Mar 07 | Topic/replies: 23,979 | Blogger: Darlo Bantam's blog Like I said before without context though that's almost irrelevant. No point laying someone who regular busts 1.10 if he plays lots of matches; rather than someone who busts 1.01 once every six months but it's the only time he hits 1.01. Without a full list of winning 1.01s, a list of losing 1.01s only tells half the picture The thread is for my reference and it works for me with other little bits of information; if it isn't helpful to you, do whatever it is makes you money and i'll use whatever works for me. No one is forcing anything in here on you. |
|
By:
Sorry, didn't realise this was a North Korean public forum where free speech and debate was banned.
|
|
By:
Dude, I don't want to have to look through your rubbish to find the information I want to use. There is a megathread for all of that; use it. Geez.
|
|
By:
Perhaps you need to put the information elsewhere then in a private channel if you don't want to have to look at other information people post on a public forum.
|
|
By:
Give it a rest dude.
|
|
By:
1.01 Nicole Gibbs vs. Jessica Pegula, WTA Quebec City R1
6-1 5*-3 40-0, also served for the match again in the decider at 5*-4. |
|
By:
.
|
|
By:
B Becker 1.03 v Istomin; St Petersburg Round 2.
|
|
By:
Gabashvili 1.01 vs. Bautista-Agut, ATP St. Petersburg R2
Gabashvili choked 5*-3 40-0 in the decider, lost 5-7 |