Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 63 comments are related to the topic:
Djokovic v Raonic

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 63
By:
yyyy
When: 28 Jan 15 09:50
Muller HAS better serve than Raonic. Particularly second serve. He is way above Raonic level. Fact.
By:
yyyy
When: 28 Jan 15 09:54
mesmerise, I've got you right. No problem. What I want you to get is to think by your own head, and not by the head of Paid TV commentators, or other biased Westerners.
By:
mesmerised
When: 28 Jan 15 09:56
Raonic won 83% of first serve points in 2014 #2 on list, Gilles not even in top 50
Raonic won 54% of second serve points in 2014 #12 on list, Muller not even in top 50
If you're trying to fish, at least make it more plausible than thatLaugh
By:
jamesbeckton.
When: 28 Jan 15 10:00
This is rubbish. Raonic has no answers and the atmosphere is flat.
By:
mesmerised
When: 28 Jan 15 10:18
This forum is absolutely dead these days.
By:
songsforthedeaf
When: 28 Jan 15 10:21
I guess most people are asleep.  They haven't missed much.
By:
yyyy
When: 28 Jan 15 10:23
you understand now what I am talking about, mr. mesmerise?
This is Novak. Forget about some MUGS like halep, questionable condition like nadal, and another beauty no much between ears genie...,
By:
songsforthedeaf
When: 28 Jan 15 10:24
What do you think of Djokers level? Is this SuperNovak of 2011? Or is this slight dodgy Novak who only scraped a Wimbers win last year?
By:
yyyy
When: 28 Jan 15 10:25
Raonic cannot outrun, outhit, outsmart djokovic.
By:
songsforthedeaf
When: 28 Jan 15 10:25
I backed Murray outright but not seen the level required yet to beat Djok
By:
yyyy
When: 28 Jan 15 10:29
hard to tell yet. He had not had true challenge this far. We'll see him against Wawrinka. That'll tell a lot.

Now, i do not think he is at 2011 yet.
The 2011 Djokovic would've already finished Raonic, and be in locker room by now. The 2011 Djokovic would send flatten and sliced balls deep in Raonic's field. This one does opposite: sends him easy to hit bouncing balls.
By:
yyyy
When: 28 Jan 15 10:33
The 2011 Djokovic was more confident. That was a ROCKBLUFF! He did not think about his opponents at all. He just was delivering his unstoppable game!

And that's normal: in 2011 Djokovic was making his way through...so as a sych, he was not not much looking back. Just relentlessly move on, dismantle everyone and anything that was on his way!! 
Now, he is in different position: sitting atop, with lot of legacy, fame, family, kid, he's a father.
By:
shiraz
When: 28 Jan 15 10:35
Just keep in mind sftd, Murray is an unusual player because of his 'reactive' play and frequently lifts his level of play when there is a need (OK sometimes he does'nt lift it even when there is a need).
By:
mesmerised
When: 28 Jan 15 10:35
If Djokovic asked you to bend over you'd be down with your undercrackers by your ankles before he'd finished saying bend
By:
yyyy
When: 28 Jan 15 10:49
even though I wish, I kind of am doubtful whether SoperNovak, ver 2011 will be up again? That version was a Determined Novak. Determined to win. It was like old Latin: "Aut vincere, aut mori"! (win or die). He was going for his life goal: to be world #1. Now he is there. That goal is not in target anymore.

He needs anotehr goal of a similar magnitude to drive him through. What would taht be? I do not see that one...or I might be wrong. Maybe that goal would be to cmplete career Slam? Maybe? It is that I do not see that strong drive in his eyes. Not just yet. Who knows...with Djoker, you never know.

That was a good question.
By:
yyyy
When: 28 Jan 15 10:51

Jan 28, 2015 -- 10:35AM, mesmerised wrote:


If Djokovic asked you to bend over you'd be down with your undercrackers by your ankles before he'd finished saying bend


LaughLaughyou seem to be upset for some reason?...because I did not eat my lap-top?

By:
yyyy
When: 28 Jan 15 10:52
CryLaugh...I promise, I will forgot that famous: it is easy to happened: 67, 67, 67!!
By:
mesmerised
When: 28 Jan 15 10:52

Jan 28, 2015 -- 9:17AM, mesmerised wrote:


When you back hypelep who loses 2-0, lay serena 2-0 who win 2-0 and call nadal value who then loses 3-0. it's probably best to stay quiet yyyy


Laugh

By:
shiraz
When: 28 Jan 15 11:00
Hang on yyyy, have you forgotten this???

"2.14 for 3-0. This appears to me short. Might be good to LAY."
By:
yyyy
When: 28 Jan 15 11:07
hey I was right. He was traded 3-0 at 2.36 (correct me if I am wrong here). So, yes, Laying 3-0 at 2.14 was a deal.
Anything else bothers ya? Wink
By:
shiraz
When: 28 Jan 15 11:15
Grin

Fair enough, I actually layed 3-0 @ 2.08 pre match for a little bit and that market traded at over 2.70 in the first set (3-3 0-30 I think) for a bit of money.  Trouble with this type of bet, unless it is a really big match there is not much interest in these markets in play and getting sizeable bets placed at the right odds is very unusual.
By:
YOMOMMA
When: 28 Jan 15 13:58
yyyy - y have u tipped 4 losing bets in a row?
By:
yyyy
When: 28 Jan 15 15:38
because I am lousy trader. Devil
By:
Platini
When: 28 Jan 15 16:38
please tell me you didn't lose money on the Venus match last night, yyyy?

even the lousiest trader should have cleaned up there.
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com