|
By:
Muller HAS better serve than Raonic. Particularly second serve. He is way above Raonic level. Fact.
|
|
By:
mesmerise, I've got you right. No problem. What I want you to get is to think by your own head, and not by the head of Paid TV commentators, or other biased Westerners.
|
|
By:
Raonic won 83% of first serve points in 2014 #2 on list, Gilles not even in top 50
Raonic won 54% of second serve points in 2014 #12 on list, Muller not even in top 50 If you're trying to fish, at least make it more plausible than that ![]() |
|
By:
This is rubbish. Raonic has no answers and the atmosphere is flat.
|
|
By:
This forum is absolutely dead these days.
|
|
By:
I guess most people are asleep. They haven't missed much.
|
|
By:
you understand now what I am talking about, mr. mesmerise?
This is Novak. Forget about some MUGS like halep, questionable condition like nadal, and another beauty no much between ears genie..., |
|
By:
What do you think of Djokers level? Is this SuperNovak of 2011? Or is this slight dodgy Novak who only scraped a Wimbers win last year?
|
|
By:
Raonic cannot outrun, outhit, outsmart djokovic.
|
|
By:
I backed Murray outright but not seen the level required yet to beat Djok
|
|
By:
hard to tell yet. He had not had true challenge this far. We'll see him against Wawrinka. That'll tell a lot.
Now, i do not think he is at 2011 yet. The 2011 Djokovic would've already finished Raonic, and be in locker room by now. The 2011 Djokovic would send flatten and sliced balls deep in Raonic's field. This one does opposite: sends him easy to hit bouncing balls. |
|
By:
The 2011 Djokovic was more confident. That was a ROCKBLUFF! He did not think about his opponents at all. He just was delivering his unstoppable game!
And that's normal: in 2011 Djokovic was making his way through...so as a sych, he was not not much looking back. Just relentlessly move on, dismantle everyone and anything that was on his way!! Now, he is in different position: sitting atop, with lot of legacy, fame, family, kid, he's a father. |
|
By:
Just keep in mind sftd, Murray is an unusual player because of his 'reactive' play and frequently lifts his level of play when there is a need (OK sometimes he does'nt lift it even when there is a need).
|
|
By:
If Djokovic asked you to bend over you'd be down with your undercrackers by your ankles before he'd finished saying bend
|
|
By:
even though I wish, I kind of am doubtful whether SoperNovak, ver 2011 will be up again? That version was a Determined Novak. Determined to win. It was like old Latin: "Aut vincere, aut mori"! (win or die). He was going for his life goal: to be world #1. Now he is there. That goal is not in target anymore.
He needs anotehr goal of a similar magnitude to drive him through. What would taht be? I do not see that one...or I might be wrong. Maybe that goal would be to cmplete career Slam? Maybe? It is that I do not see that strong drive in his eyes. Not just yet. Who knows...with Djoker, you never know. That was a good question. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
![]() ...I promise, I will forgot that famous: it is easy to happened: 67, 67, 67!! |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Hang on yyyy, have you forgotten this???
"2.14 for 3-0. This appears to me short. Might be good to LAY." |
|
By:
hey I was right. He was traded 3-0 at 2.36 (correct me if I am wrong here). So, yes, Laying 3-0 at 2.14 was a deal.
Anything else bothers ya? ![]() |
|
By:
![]() Fair enough, I actually layed 3-0 @ 2.08 pre match for a little bit and that market traded at over 2.70 in the first set (3-3 0-30 I think) for a bit of money. Trouble with this type of bet, unless it is a really big match there is not much interest in these markets in play and getting sizeable bets placed at the right odds is very unusual. |
|
By:
yyyy - y have u tipped 4 losing bets in a row?
|
|
By:
because I am lousy trader.
![]() |
|
By:
please tell me you didn't lose money on the Venus match last night, yyyy?
even the lousiest trader should have cleaned up there. |