Obviously has a huge serve, for me he has been somewaht disappointing, not sure he has the movement to win on grass. Even if he beats Fed there is no way I see him beating Djokovic who could nullify his serve to some degree.
Think today will be end of the line for him - players like Nishi (poor on grass) and Kyrgios (was knackered) gave him problems - can't imagine Fed will fail to do so much more today.
Think today will be end of the line for him - players like Nishi (poor on grass) and Kyrgios (was knackered) gave him problems - can't imagine Fed will fail to do so much more today.
Kyrgios took out Nadal in the best performance of the tourn. Considering Nadal actually played well
and did not hand it to him.
Raonic was clinical the way he took out Kyrgios.
The formline to follow in this tourn.
Raonic wins the lot. imo
Think he wins including the final. Kyrgios took out Nadal in the best performance of the tourn. Considering Nadal actually played welland did not hand it to him. Raonic was clinical the way he took out Kyrgios. The formline to follow in this tourn. R
AFL - Do you think he's also got the mental strength to beat the most elite in this stage though? One thing beating lower players, now he's got the biggies.
AFL - Do you think he's also got the mental strength to beat the most elite in this stage though? One thing beating lower players, now he's got the biggies.
MR has made it clear that his aim is steady progress. Getting to the semi of a GS fits in with this but Fed is very good at moving oponants around the court when required and movement is not MR's strongest point. If the serving is good, then perhaps the first set IMHO
MR has made it clear that his aim is steady progress. Getting to the semi of a GS fits in with this but Fed is very good at moving oponants around the court when required and movement is not MR's strongest point. If the serving is good, then perhaps
Raonic is a perfect opponent for Fed: tall, one-dimensional and bad defensivley, he will be fed the Federer backhand slize all day long, as simple as that.
Raonic is a perfect opponent for Fed: tall, one-dimensional and bad defensivley, he will be fed the Federer backhand slize all day long, as simple as that.
Raonic is utter crap, worse than Dimitrov. If he beats Federer I'll give you the money myself. Take away Raonic's serve and you're left with someone worse than Tim Henman.
Raonic is utter crap, worse than Dimitrov. If he beats Federer I'll give you the money myself. Take away Raonic's serve and you're left with someone worse than Tim Henman.
Problem for Raonic is once he gets in to rallies with Federer he won't even win 33% of them. He just isn't a good enough a tennis player. Needs a lot of improvement on his game before he can challenge at the top.
Problem for Raonic is once he gets in to rallies with Federer he won't even win 33% of them. He just isn't a good enough a tennis player. Needs a lot of improvement on his game before he can challenge at the top.
Raonic can't sustain rallies with any of the top players. IMO he doesn't stand a chance against a returner like Djokovic. But... if he serves really well vs. Fed he has a chance at a couple of tiebreaks. His ground game when he is ultra aggressive and hits the ball really hard and deep is not too bad either. If he hits a lot of those backhand slice shots that work against the muppets, Fed is going to rip him apart. IMO we'll know within half a set if he has a chance.
Raonic can't sustain rallies with any of the top players. IMO he doesn't stand a chance against a returner like Djokovic. But... if he serves really well vs. Fed he has a chance at a couple of tiebreaks. His ground game when he is ultra aggressive an
Sorry! I got a middle on aces handicap. It didn't look at all likely but then Raonic hit loads of aces 2nd and 3rd set. He serves on average more than 1 ace per service game. Free point per game.
Sorry! I got a middle on aces handicap. It didn't look at all likely but then Raonic hit loads of aces 2nd and 3rd set. He serves on average more than 1 ace per service game. Free point per game.
A little harsh - he's similar to Rafter or Phillopusus in his game. Old school big serve game. If anything, an achievement that he's doing so well with such an old school game, as big servers don't dominate these days.
A little harsh - he's similar to Rafter or Phillopusus in his game. Old school big serve game. If anything, an achievement that he's doing so well with such an old school game, as big servers don't dominate these days.
Oh yeah he can only beat what's in front of him fair enough on that point. But he is really a poor player, rafter in particular had a lot to his game, Raonic doesn't imo
Oh yeah he can only beat what's in front of him fair enough on that point. But he is really a poor player, rafter in particular had a lot to his game, Raonic doesn't imo
no it's not, being a big server is a natural weapon when you're that tall and strong, it's just a matter of executing a good serve which comes easier in time with muscle memory as it does with any server, as well as having time to think whereas baseline rallying you have to make constant split second decisions, it requires more skill and an aptitude for quick thinking,
no it's not, being a big server is a natural weapon when you're that tall and strong, it's just a matter of executing a good serve which comes easier in time with muscle memory as it does with any server, as well as having time to think whereas basel