Tennis
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Obviously has a huge serve, for me he has been somewaht disappointing, not sure he has the movement to win on grass. Even if he beats Fed there is no way I see him beating Djokovic who could nullify his serve to some degree.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 41
|
By:
Think today will be end of the line for him - players like Nishi (poor on grass) and Kyrgios (was knackered) gave him problems - can't imagine Fed will fail to do so much more today.
|
|
By:
May not bet though, as prices prob about right - maybe just a game to watch this one.
|
|
By:
Think he wins including the final.
Kyrgios took out Nadal in the best performance of the tourn. Considering Nadal actually played well and did not hand it to him. Raonic was clinical the way he took out Kyrgios. The formline to follow in this tourn. Raonic wins the lot. imo |
|
By:
AFL - Do you think he's also got the mental strength to beat the most elite in this stage though? One thing beating lower players, now he's got the biggies.
|
|
By:
Fed's second home is centre court, Raonic will be shaking going out there.
|
|
By:
MR has made it clear that his aim is steady progress. Getting to the semi of a GS fits in with this but Fed is very good at moving oponants around the court when required and movement is not MR's strongest point. If the serving is good, then perhaps the first set IMHO
|
|
By:
Yes good points. Not sure if he will fold mentally, but surely the Kyrgios Nadal match told him something about that.
 |
|
By:
Djoker owns Rancid
|
|
By:
So does Fed in terms of H2H (4-0, latest meeting was straight sets)
|
|
By:
Can see potential for lot of missed first serves and doubles for Raonic today.
|
|
By:
Raonic is a perfect opponent for Fed: tall, one-dimensional and bad defensivley, he will be fed the Federer backhand slize all day long, as simple as that.
|
|
By:
Raonic is utter crap, worse than Dimitrov. If he beats Federer I'll give you the money myself. Take away Raonic's serve and you're left with someone worse than Tim Henman.
|
|
By:
There will be no Wettquoten on Milos Raonic ever.
|
|
By:
I'd be surprised if he beat Fed (even an old Fed), but even if he does, Joker or Dimitrov will be rubbing their hands.
|
|
By:
Problem for Raonic is once he gets in to rallies with Federer he won't even win 33% of them. He just isn't a good enough a tennis player. Needs a lot of improvement on his game before he can challenge at the top.
|
|
By:
Raonic can't sustain rallies with any of the top players. IMO he doesn't stand a chance against a returner like Djokovic. But... if he serves really well vs. Fed he has a chance at a couple of tiebreaks. His ground game when he is ultra aggressive and hits the ball really hard and deep is not too bad either. If he hits a lot of those backhand slice shots that work against the muppets, Fed is going to rip him apart. IMO we'll know within half a set if he has a chance.
|
|
By:
I see him beating Fed in tie-breaks, but will Fed let it get to TBs?
|
|
By:
Think more can Raonic keep up his serving level is the question - if not then Fed will break him.
|
|
By:
raonic looks one tricky(big srve) pony in all truth.
|
|
By:
such a mug
|
|
By:
Dinara safina put up a better display in her wimbledon semi final against Venus
 what a handy draw mugerer got this year |
|
By:
So predictable it is laughable. GTFI you mofo's. ££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
Sorry! I got a middle on aces handicap. It didn't look at all likely but then Raonic hit loads of aces 2nd and 3rd set. He serves on average more than 1 ace per service game. Free point per game.
|
|
By:
sure he has plenty of limitations but will earn a very good living with them, needs to improve plenty to lift titles
|
|
By:
he'll never win anything playing with a stookie
 |
|
By:
Glad he lost, reminded me of tennis at it's most boring. He looks like he should be in the Jersey Boys.
|
|
By:
If this one trick pony ever wins a slam I'll never watch tennis again
|
|
By:
A little harsh - he's similar to Rafter or Phillopusus in his game. Old school big serve game. If anything, an achievement that he's doing so well with such an old school game, as big servers don't dominate these days.
|
|
By:
However, he can't serve/volley the way they did. Maybe he should try to.
|
|
By:
Exactly - need to play at the net with that serve, he isnt good enough at back of th court.
|
|
By:
He is nothing like Rafter or Phillopusus, they could get to the net , by the time Raonic gets to the net its like he has been in quicksand for an hour
|
|
By:
Even more impressive that he made the semi then!
|
|
By:
Oh yeah he can only beat what's in front of him fair enough on that point. But he is really a poor player, rafter in particular had a lot to his game, Raonic doesn't imo
|
|
By:
I have to agree. Raonic has little to his game bar his serve. As I said in a previous post take away his serve and he's worse than Tim Henman.
|
|
By:
That's bit like saying 'take away Djokers baseline play'
|
|
By:
...and he'd be worse than Andrew Castle!
|
|
By:
But being able to rally is an integral part of the game.
|
|
By:
been able to hit two shots in a row is integral to the game!!! Djokovic is a class player, raonic is eh s hit
|