|
By:
Sad state of affairs if she does.
|
|
By:
It's a tough call. The 2 biggest vultures are left. Radwanska and Kvitova.
|
|
By:
would love to see A Rad win it , great player to watch
|
|
By:
Radwanska doesn't have a tennis brain
. |
|
By:
probably thats the reason coaches call her professore
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
Dawaj Agnieszka
|
|
By:
hingis did what radders does but 100 times better
|
|
By:
you'd have to say every player with the exception of sabine is a tidy price now, mainly because sabine's installation as favourite is batshit crazy.
frothing rabid dog insanity. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
hey thanks, aaronh!
![]() Now I know who won't win. I owe you big time, buddy! ![]() |
|
By:
if she had brains she would've already won it!
![]() |
|
By:
Sabine is a mug: therefore she won't win it. They all are mugs, but she is one of the leaders! She had 0:9 lsoing games against SW and wa 0:40 down oh her ow serve. Then MAMMA decided to tank it! weird to me, you know.
![]() ![]() ![]() So, Sabine's win has nothing to do with Sabine...she is a mug. The only player left in the draw who's got brains is Li. But she has sh11ty serve??? ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Look at the odds, any of the 8 can win it, it will be who plays best on the day, will go through to semi-finals, Final and win Wimbledon 2013 and at least it makes it interesting
|
|
By:
Some of you need to realize that the top ballbashers are also very skilled players. Radwanska has excellent and plays the right angels but don't act like she a genius and everybody else is dumbo. Any decent player with reliable groundstrokes that doesn't miss overheads (very important against Rad) has a good chance against her. What's her best GS win in the last years? Kerber?
|
|
By:
*excellent touch
|
|
By:
whats the biggest azarenka names she beat in grand slams?
|
|
By:
They don't compare really, Azarenka is a on another league as she is a double GS winner and no1 high ranking. But anyway Azarenka has GS wins over Li, Stosur, Clijsters, Sharapova and Radwanska since AO 2012.
|
|
By:
A bit of a difference i would say.
|
|
By:
cri****
Look at the odds, any of the 8 can win it, .... ------------- Any of the 7 can win it. Kvitova can't. (she cost me the fortune ). |
|
By:
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
if you look at all the player she could possibly face then
QF v li na - 4 / 6 SF v kanepi - 4 / 0 or lisicki - 1 / 1 F v stephens - 2 / 0 , bartoli - 7 / 0,. flipkins 3-0, kvitova - 1 / 4 this could be her best chance ever |
|
By:
I wonder if Sabine would be fave in a semi final
![]() |
|
By:
can be that kanepi wins,sabine will be drained emotionally and theres no day off she may be vulnerable tommorow
|
|
By:
She could have played bigger names if she would have beaten Vinci and Errani no? And btw did those two fired winners past Rad or they used slices, topspins, dropshots and volleys aka beating her at her own game? See what i mean now?
There is always something new to know but i'm fine with my understanding of the sport thank you. Don't see what's so wrong in my post that experts would go nuts. I even praised Rad a bit lol. |
|
By:
check her h2h against vinci and errani
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
wasnt that errani calling her professore before the match last time, i heard it few time before form some tennis writers
|
|
By:
Li, Kvitova, Radwanska all have a very good chance. Lisicki next, then Kanepi has a pretty good outside chance. Well it's a good opportunity for all of them :)) Some would be happy with a SF
|
|
By:
sabine last time beat up shaza lost her next match to kerber,although it was close
|
|
By:
i think kanepi price is great actually, she will have tough draw in semis but she usually plays very well as an underdog and its only 3 matches basically ,she has same chance as sabine to me and shes 32 and sabine 3.5
![]() |
|
By:
She might have the best touch and you can call it however you want. Try Magician sounds better. But she can loose to a few players left in the draw. Anyone that follows tennis know her, she has mad skills but so does the ballbashers. It's not all power, you still need technique and some talent to strike the ball hard. Ever saw how hard Martic can serve? She is a bit toned but the power comes also from very good technique.
|
|
By:
martic is 1.81 radwanska is 1.74 , dont know ifyou ever seen her life but rad is very skinny, its actually amazing how she can play being like that,its for sure skinniest player i ever seen, especially from behind her legs like sticks and tiny bottom, she is proportionally build but you cant squeeze more power on her ground strokes especially where she has short swing which is more difficult to read so its suit her better, she still can overpower ball pushers if she wants too and she does sometimes. serve maybe but she has this shoulder issue for long time and it affect her development in this area, although she put some more weight on it in last couple years but its definitely area she has something to gain still
|
|
By:
ninjawanska
![]() |
|
By:
arong are you on kanepi 32 as all shrewdies do?
|