Tennis
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 1060 comments are related to the topic:
ATP Monte Carlo 16/04
ATP Monte Carlo 16/04
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 1,060
|
By:
Did Janowicz just lose BOTH points on serve?
|
|
By:
took some monfils at 3.5
|
|
By:
went toilet at 1-1...come back it's 4-1
 |
|
By:
yes he lost
|
|
By:
nice choke Jerzy
|
|
By:
how the **** did janowicz lose that tb? MUG
|
|
By:
Fool of yurek u mug
|
|
By:
what i said is behond the shadow of the doubt. if you consider someone on serve, to have 0,6 chance of winning the point, and considering the scenario of winning them in a row. the computation will be the same as i expressed (in this case of 60% = 0,6, so it will be 0,6*0,6*0,6*0,6| from 30-30 0,6*0,6)
|
|
By:
Fook
|
|
By:
I haven't been watching Monfils, what has happened, last time I was watching he was getting schooled.
|
|
By:
this topic is doing my head in lol can we just agree to disagree
|
|
By:
what is not considered are the scenarios of not needing to win a row, with 40-15 or if getting to deuce...
|
|
By:
did commentator just say "ger' monfils"
|
|
By:
The swing should on the market, be bigger nearer the end of a match, but at a level score, whether it is in the game, set or match, the odds should be consistent. The probability was already determined by the prematch odds. That probability is inferred for the match, set, game and each point. So, any deviation around those odds should become bigger as the scores stay level and the number of points required to win gets lower, but should not vary otherwise. Were they to start at evens, they should be evens at 7-6 6-7 6-6. So, they too should be evens at 5-5 30-30, for example.
|
|
By:
i could swear montanes won the point
|
|
By:
montanes just gone to pieces at the mo. for no reason either. monfils aint done nothing
|
|
By:
i dont do need nor use this crap analysis in play...
|
|
By:
i still think montanes will win
|
|
By:
i think everyone's opinions rubbish is rubbish and that we should all listen to schillachi because his advice is the best always has been always will be
|
|
By:
This is how my tennis scheme works, in some ways, and it is based on statistics which I have proven.
|
|
By:
this monfils match is annoying
|
|
By:
few more martinis for monfils pls
|
|
By:
monfils is wan k, just winning with aces and montanes errors at the mo
|
|
By:
dolgo is killing this mug potro from the start!
|
|
By:
SoA your understanding of probability is wrongfooted
|
|
By:
Classic Monfils this.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
monfils has better athleticism than djokovic
|
|
By:
winner market is suspended....did djokovic retire?
|
|
By:
it's a massacre of potro
|
|
By:
not sure about this match now
|
|
By:
Anyone think Almagro might lose?
|
|
By:
not sure about clown?
he's capable to win this 6-2 6-2 he was practicing in 1st set |
|
By:
Don't you just love the slow starting Monfils.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
gsm monfils. im turning over to pooooootro. gl
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
you are all saying this now but how many of you backed him when he was in the 3's and 4's with me??
|
|
By:
he still aint started for me!! how montanes let him win that i dont know
|