Tennis
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 243 comments are related to the topic:
mustburgers v mint grace
mustburgers v mint grace
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 243
|
By:
the answer is not to bet on qualifiers.
|
|
By:
not at all, very good trading. and lay 1st seed as standard and never look back may be
|
|
By:
a lot of tournaments have a random lucky loser, so that wouldnt work.
|
|
By:
well its better than random isnt it as we could know who can be dodgy .if random you would know feck al and same things would happen as now but with different players.dont bet on qualies final round unprepared and witout assurance who is where
|
|
By:
and lay 1st seed as standard in tournaments that do not have a random lucky loser spot and never look back may be
ffs |
|
By:
There are exactly 4 tournaments a year with a random/drawn lucky loser each year and every child knows which ones those are
 |
|
By:
layed sousa hope mugzer will turn it around
|
|
By:
yes was just about to add something of the sort but this child didn't know the exact amount. thanks
 didn't layd mugzer  |
|
By:
There are more than just Grand Slams.
|
|
By:
que?
|
|
By:
I saw it online somewhere, it varies from one tournament to another.
|
|
By:
just kidding
|
|
By:
No it does not SoA. A simple look at the available rulebooks of both the ATP/WTA and the ITF Grand Slam rulebook before trying to argue with me would have revealed that simple fact to you
 |
|
By:
answers please quickly. we're in 24h tennis frenzy u know. rain permitted
|
|
By:
Im just telling you what I saw previously. Ignore me at your peril.
|
|
By:
If for some reason the highest losing qualifying seed in an ATP/WTA tournament did not get the lucky loser spot, then that's because he didn't sign up or had left the tournament site already. It's that simple. Rules regarding lucky losers do not vary among normal tournaments.
|
|
By:
and I am just educating you regarding the rules at hand after you tried to be a smartass and arguing without knowing the simplest of rules.
|
|
By:
that's actually nice of me, you know?
|
|
By:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucky_loser
|
|
By:
usually the thread degenerate during the match you know
|
|
By:
Lately the thread hijacking and degeneration just hasn't been what it used to be.
 I blame Eva for not umpiring and Maria not playing enough matches.In any case it was an important thing to clear up. Can't have someone else believing in wrong rules because some forumite told him it varies from tournament to tournament. |
|
By:
 who would believed in those rules,as u said every kid knows that |
|
By:
can't believe stupid fischman is playing again
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
it was much needed schooling and on behalf of the community and the internet for that matter thank you for it
just that the back and forth was pretty disappointing Kiki Dutch girls are so cleanly or Arantxa would have TANKed it |
|
By:
did any of you guys bet on Kiki?
|
|
By:
Some rookie maybe. Whatever, I just like being right.
Sometimes my big smartass-ness screws me over and fucks me in the ass and you people get back at me with dancing and singing cats (NOFFYYYYYY!!!!  ), but hey....I actually like learning and being educated if I'm wrong. |
|
By:
wrote it down in my diary and will always treasure this moment, especially as it was about butters too
|
|
By:
LETS GO KIKI BERTENS
|
|
By:
Results wise, is there a difference these days between Arantxa tanking and trying her hardest?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
just score wise i think. but it's the intention that counts
|
|
By:
i like her my hart burns whn she is losing badly
|
|
By:
you're all winners if you participated and all. hippies
|
|
By:
why she would even tank ever,not like she has enough of winning
|
|
By:
even torres floor beat her
|
|
By:
injury-tank type, could have easily done that and collect instead of letting fishmen play
|
|
By:
what you guys on about? who's tanking?
|
|
By:
Rus
|
