Tennis
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 622 comments are related to the topic:
kitova v robson
kitova v robson
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 622
|
By:
smb i have no time for extended discussion today as far as i like it so i will save it for next time
|
|
By:
tasngo, when that happens it's annoying, but with betting as in life, it's better to try and succeed and lose, then not to try as well. In this case, to try, not be matched, and see it succeed with ease. The worse. I think 12 hours sleep in 96 hours isn't helping my cause to be rational!
|
|
By:
Prize funds should do with the popularity .:. revenues created by that sport. I've no idea, but didn't someone once say WTA had better viewing figures so if anything they should be paid more. I certainly don't buy they only play bo3 over bo5 argument. Revenues are king.
|
|
By:
Yeah I'm pretty sure the WTA is an extremely marketable product, much more so than the men's game (except for the very elite players - Fed etc.)
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Just the usual moaning fattys on here, same nearly every day when its not 100% top notch tennis...
|
|
By:
'didn't someone once say WTA had better viewing figures'
 I think one year one US Open final attracted more viewers years back but that's about it |
|
By:
There it is. Fecking muppets backing 2-0 1.33 getting punished.
|
|
By:
Cool. Didn't seem to ring true to me either Don. Wonder what the figures are for the b2b masters.
|
|
By:
Robson looks long odds here.
|
|
By:
1.55 on Kvitova, not for me.
|
|
By:
this can go either way...no confidence in petra
|
|
By:
Laura means business here
|
|
By:
cicak doesn't have some bug spray? what an awful inadequate umpire
|
|
By:
Kvitovashriek is here, 6-0 or 1-6 incoming, impossible to know which
 |
|
By:
The market moves so much for Laura missing her first serve, it's incredible, but sadly probably correct
|
|
By:
even money bet when kvitova hold serve to 1-0
|
|
By:
according to commentator
|
|
By:
This commentator really ought to be backing Robson with some money. Great value.
|
|
By:
Did he actually say 'even'?
|
|
By:
Yes.
|
|
By:
Wow, what a fool
|
|
By:
I've seen them say that about 1.2x shots!
|
|
By:
For some reason the commentators do like to talk in odds or betting terms but you're right RMB, they usually have no clue what the odds should be
|
|
By:
Got to be making those Laura.
|
|
By:
scream comming
|
|
By:
2.00 on Robson in danger!!
|
|
By:
no scream
 |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Kvitova has eyes like Berdych
|
|
By:
blue
|
|
By:
They're massive short termists, so anyone taking the 2nd set going into a decider in WTA will always be favourite.
|
|
By:
We hear the same thing each year about robson and her potential. Problem is that she just hasn't inproved/got significantly better. Extremely limited and overhyped player.
|
|
By:
commentator must be one of them momentum backers
|
|
By:
Improved*
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
didn't they say that they would put laura as a fav between the 2nd and 3rd sets?
|
|
By:
I took Kvitova on at 1.13 quite heavily but left the 1.55 at the start of the decider so this collapse is obvious. Just wish the commentators were right as would have switched at 2.0 or levelled in between.
|
|
By:
she improved a lot and still teenager
|
|
By:
She hasn't improved? She's 18, won a gold medal last year and got to the fourth round of the US Open in quite spectacular fashion.
|