|
By:
waste of 3 minutes
|
|
By:
Cage of light
|
|
By:
So mediocre
![]() |
|
By:
Rubbish
|
|
By:
wonderful
|
|
By:
Figs opened his Guiness
![]() |
|
By:
great and biggest audience reaction
|
|
By:
you guys are clueless
|
|
By:
apart from H
|
|
By:
Wow -great dance audience reaction was great too
|
|
By:
Lol wait for Kaz audience reaction
|
|
By:
sᴜᴘᴇʀ ᴛᴠ
@superTV247 · 44m This is it then! Who’s going to win?! |
|
By:
Amber & Nikita
7.3% George & Alexis 45.8% Karen & Carlos 46.9% |
|
By:
we see george's gf in audience but iirc she never appeared in any support video, never visited him training. odd.
|
|
By:
Craig nearly in tears
|
|
By:
opening the vote after Karen's showdance is the sealer
|
|
By:
I'll be amazed if Kaz doesn't blow that out the water
|
|
By:
Anton:
On Strictly Come Dancing, this judges’ comment again reads as journey-completion, not winner-justification. Phrases like “I appreciated all the styles”, “now you are in it”, “through storytelling” and “it showed true emotion” are affirmative, but they don’t establish dominance or leadership. There’s no comparative framing, no “this could win it”, no sense that he’s now ahead. The key tell is “now you are in it” — that explicitly implies arrival at the end of a process, not control of the competition. Add in the closing “congratulations”, and it feels like a narrative cap rather than a launch into a winning position. If George were leading the public vote, this is exactly the moment the judges would be justifying it clearly. Instead, they’re validating growth and emotion. Which brings it back to the same conclusion: No justification = no lead to explain. Craig’s On Strictly Come Dancing, this comment continues the same pattern — affirmation without authority. Praising “changes of rhythm”, “power and presence”, “fantastically achieved lifts” and “true emotion” is all positive, but it’s still descriptive, not directive. The judge is explaining what worked, not signalling what wins. The key line is “now you are in it”. That’s arrival language, not leadership language. It implies a moment of connection or completion rather than someone pulling clear of the field. There’s still no comparison, no “you’ve set the standard”, no “this is winning territory”. Even the closing “congratulations” functions as a soft full stop — a reward for growth and storytelling — rather than a push toward inevitability. Same conclusion again: If George were leading the vote, this is where the judges would justify it explicitly. They aren’t. Which strongly suggests there’s nothing to justify. |
|
By:
George has been on the best journey
|
|
By:
oh dear
![]() |
|
By:
The judges... you could just put a tape recorder on repeat saying the same fluff. Its a complete waste of time cutting to them for their feedback.
|
|
By:
Shraine in changing his data to suit the favourite shocker
|
|
By:
This is masterful stuff from George
|
|
By:
Karen has gone 11% clear in SS poll without dancing her showcase
|
|
By:
It's over bear
|
|
By:
Be 1.1 in 10 minutes
|
|
By:
People are on the pitch
|
|
By:
Karen winning FB and IG stats. FB by a whisker, but you'd expect George to be beating Karen on Insta
|
|
By:
great vt from karen
|
|
By:
Karen
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Best showdance ever
![]() |
|
By:
Wallop
|
|
By:
lol clowns
|
|
By:
Shirley keeping her dignity
|
|
By:
not out of sync, down the plughole
|
|
By:
The show's favouritism for Karen is quite apparent, I haven't watched the show in months and it's clear as day to me
|
|
By:
By far the most entertaining of the night
|
|
By:
They want George
![]() |
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
It's ok vote opens soon then we see what way this is going
|