|
By:
-is*
|
|
By:
68,700 now. Dunno why your browser shows different.
|
|
By:
And that 10k lump at 1.5 for Attraction is me.
|
|
By:
Alice was dreadful.
I'm always a sceptic with these things tho, rather trust my instinct. Apart from Figgy's Twitter Stats ![]() |
|
By:
Alice was dreadful on the night but behind Attraction, had the most 'weighted' Youtube hits which without the stats could have suggested people would vote for her anyway.
|
|
By:
The 12,000 is from Palemoon (a faster version of Firefox). I’ve now opened up Chrome and Internet Explorer 64, and I get 69,000 from both
![]() What browser are you using Bearcub? |
|
By:
Not sure how good they will be this year. Twitter seems to be getting worse and worse as a guide. |
|
By:
It had James More in clear 2nd last night and he didn't even make top 3
|
|
By:
Mostly women thinking he was hot tbf, rather than enjoying his magic
|
|
By:
My honest belief is that women's ovaries are the main reason no stats are ever 100% accurate, the ovaries defy logic.
|
|
By:
firefox, but i have 2 fb accounts
1 shows 12,335 the other shows 70,785 on the same browser. Feck knows what that is ![]() |
|
By:
Alice was always going to struggle, even if she was great. Nobody was going to Like that performance. It was possible she would get a sympathy vote but it wouldn't show up on FB
|
|
By:
Palemoon is basically Firefox (tweaked). That's our answer. Ditch Firefox for FB.
|
|
By:
Twitter was superb for a couple of years, but that is when it was mostly MEM's and all the kids were on FB.
It would even be very close to the actual percentages. Now it's become full of kids plus trendy types who don't vote |
|
By:
Gabz, Luminites & Jordan, surely all fishing in the same pond
|
|
By:
Jordan has the most gran appeal of the 3, but is likely to be on early
|
|
By:
Now you've gone down to 1.43 Danzaa. You're too impatient. Move it up. There's a week to go.
|
|
By:
We had Sam Kelly and Ryan O'Shaunessy last year to show us that attractive guitarists struggle to get 5% of the vote. All the singers with the possible exception of Richard and Adam are write-offs for me.
|
|
By:
Henry, all the HS bookies are at 1.36 - 1.4 already, it'll be there soon too, just trying to squeeze the pounds before it does.
|
|
By:
Betvictor and Corals are at 1.3
|
|
By:
Same here Danzaa. I can only see Jack or R & A beating Attraction if either have a stormer
|
|
By:
Hmmm, if you moved it to 1.46 you'd still be the best offer for the layers.
|
|
By:
I wouldn't be surprised to see Attraction on first ALA Spelbound, with the exact right RO, someone else might just get it.
|
|
By:
Weren't Spellbound on last?
|
|
By:
Henry, only cos other people took down their bets when mine jumped over them now theres space. I also want to offer people some value.
|
|
By:
Were they? Maybe I'm misremembering, too many of these shows...
|
|
By:
Just checked wiki.
Yes, spellbound got the pimp in the final |
|
By:
That's even better news, the hot favourites get pimp. I do remember Ashleigh and Pudsey being 2nd last and Jonathan and Charlotte being last in the final last year so it would make sense that that's the case.
|
|
By:
We had insight that year.
|
|
By:
Another act, like Attraction, that I really didn't get.
A much weaker final though. Only Twist and Pulse could have beaten them, or maybe Janey if she'd remembered her words |
|
By:
I truly believe Janey never stood a hope in hell.
|
|
By:
She beat Twist & Pulse in her heat.
|
|
By:
I don't want to think about Janey in heat
|
|
By:
Her final performance was a shambles
|
|
By:
The TCOs / favs don't always get pimp. The kid that was supposed to beat Jai went early.
|
|
By:
I'm sure she's in Heaven
Don't worry Danzaa |
|
By:
We know she regretted nothing - except that BGT final ****-up.
|
|
By:
I don't think Cowell will risk another 'Jai'
|
|
By:
You'd be in a bit of a sh1tter if you kept laying Attraction all the way down!
|
|
By:
glad they didn't go in heat 1. They would have killed the betting market
|