Specials
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 511 comments are related to the topic:
****IACGMOOH tuesdays show - eric v the critters/others ****
****IACGMOOH tuesdays show - eric v the critters/others ****
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 511
|
By:
No, Chris at 200/1 was bet of the year
 |
|
By:
Good time to note Marcus never topped a vote, and I think he was far better than single candle jahmene
Marcus never topped the vote and as far as we are aware neither has Jahmene. Like another singing candle Rebecca all were still dead certs for the final having polled consistently high throughout. |
|
By:
I'm not saying that the IAC vote was wrong last night, just that if any of the others were eliminated we would find reasons.
when I look at the reasons for any of them going last night I find the reasons for Rosie going not very obvious at all. Eric, liked by men not by women that vote had already been B2 was a bit nasty of course he could go, polling badly Hugo, already B2 not a great show for him traded odds on no surprise in him going, polling badly, very wet David, already B2 had little air time, was arogant at times Ash, little air time, american see rule 1.01, blonde, twitter was likeing but not voting, Charley, never got to do any trials, bit with the kid came to late or worked against her, eastenders curse |
|
By:
When Ant and Dec go through the candidates, "it's not you", "it might be you", if you're told it might be you, are we certain that the person is actually in the bottom 2, or is it just a name they read out to keep us guessing. They always say at the start 'in no particular order'. Do we know for certain that the person who is told it might be them but who doesn't go, was definitely in the bottom 2?
|
|
By:
No Biscuit. In previous years it's normally been the real b2, but not always.
We just don't know |
|
By:
Just on the DVO v Louis debate....I was pro DVO early when most were against,but after this weekend I've switched horses and am now with Louis.My first series of watching this,but it looks like to me Louis is being under marked in preparation for a late "improvement" whereas I disagree with Dizz about public opinion on DVO....she's by far the best dancer,but that only reinforces public opinion that she's a ringer.
|
|
By:
GeorgeBrush 28 Nov 12 10:27
No Biscuit. In previous years it's normally been the real b2, but not always. We just don't know Ok thanks, so mach is wrong with his comments when he says of certain people, "already B2" |
|
By:
Yes, I'd go with the assumption that most are real, but treat with caution
|
|
By:
I assumed Eric was bottom 2 in the trial vs Colin
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
When people talk about the show nobody even seems to mention DVO
|
|
By:
The Eric, Colin bottom 2 was 100% the real bottom 2
|
|
By:
I think most are bottom 2 but 1 or 2 aren't ie Mark last year. I don't think David was bottom 2. By the way, why keep the phone lines open longer last night than most nights? Think it was 9.38 when they closed them.
|
|
By:
This autumn's shows have been the hardest to fathom since I've been taking tv betting seriously - which is a good 8 years or so now.
|
|
By:
TM was 1st Ashley
2nd David 3rd. Charley Not that means anything  |
|
By:
Last night both surprised me and cost me... thought Shergar was nailed to stay. Ho Hum!
|
|
By:
TV polls had her on 52%
|
|
By:
29 last night
Shame it didn't turn up during the show Almost half turned off her and I guess apathy explains the rest |
|
By:
Maybe receiving letters from home tonight.....hoping for some Charlie tears
 |
|
By:
Plus a few forum votes of course. Far too early to write off tvpolls though
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
It might only be right when most of us on here are right.
Why don't we do a poll on here of how many of us vote on tv polls and how many times! |
|
By:
Down to 29 tho.... We know how volatile this show is. I don't doubt she was extremely popular just a day or two before
|
|
By:
Start a thread lucky - a TVpoll amnesty
|
|
By:
Down to 29 after the result was announced
|
|
By:
Never started a thread in 10 years on here!
|
|
By:
Yep, a problem, and I suspect the money coming for Ash yesterday had summat to do with that
|
|
By:
LOL at the photo of Charlie's daughter's face in the Sun.
|
|
By:
a mix of sympathetic and unsympathetic comments following the Daily Hell article about the situation with Charlie and her daughter.
|
|
By:
I read them too squares.....sympathetic to the daughter and to a degree Charlie,scathing of the programme was the gist of what I read.
|
|
By:
well, quite a few saying why isn't the child at school and she's hardly suffering in a luxury hotel with her Nan while her Mum's earning a shedload of cash for a few weeks apart.
Too much is made of these celebs missing their kids on these programmes. It's not as if they're on a nine month tour of duty in Afghanistan. Although imo, these programmes shouldn't bring family members into the equation. |
|
By:
Only put them in popularity order and read the first 20 or so....your more thorough than me
Agree with your sentiments though,I guess a bit of emotion makes good TV whatever the rights or wrongs in the prods eyes.Just to warn you,I think there could be a segment tonight with letters from home  |
|
By:
loads more sympathy for Charlie and sprog on DS than in the heartless Daily Hell.
|
|
By:
ffs, letters from home - they'll all be reunited over the next three days
|
|
By:
letters from home... floods of tears all round... ffs - they make out like they've been held in a POW camp for the last 5 years.
|
|
By:
Going back a little.
If I'd seen Rosemary had dropped from 52-29 % in one day then I'd have been worried about her safety. Unfortunately TVpolls is useless for elims as we don't get the results until after the show. |
|
By:
TVPolls = horrendous after timers
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
It is pretty pointless doing their poll until the final, unless they send the results out before the show |
|
By:
Agreed fig. I certainly may have squared up a little anyway
As Tvpolls man was doing |