|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
Never in doubt
![]() |
|
By:
More craziness!
![]() |
|
By:
How wasteful have the Stormers been here???
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Don't know how the Brumbies can possibly argue with that.
|
|
By:
No idea how the Stormers managed to not win that.
|
|
By:
Crusaders have got an unbeaten record against the Lions at home, but I think their squad for tonight lacks the depth it usually has.
The Lions were much better against a similarly weakened Chiefs team last week. Crusaders obviously still strong favourites, but I wouldn't be a backer at 1.09. As a one-off play, the Highlanders look a fair price against the Sunwolves, but the Sunwolves often score plenty of points themselves, so I'll be sitting on my hands hoping they get a bit of a lead. |
|
By:
Have to Agree Lats on what you say , hate to oppose the Cruasders at home but have backed the Lions on the handicap with a 22 point start which seems fair
given the players the home side have rested.Also thought the Highlanders were value -9 against the Wolves but like most of us on here really enjoy watching the home team it really is just attack after attack.The only consistent thing about the games this year though is the lack of consistency!! |
|
By:
Missed the first 10 mins taking my son to college (was already 10-0 when I got in), and then saw the Lions go through phase after phase before eventually deciding to take the 3 from right in front (wrong call, IMHO). Scoreline quite flattering for what I've seen, but I guess that sums up the clinical nature of the 'Saders.
|
|
By:
Yep, got this wrong (again) . Just too good. Although its hard enough playing against 15 men withou the help of the man in the middle. Several offside calls been very harsh.
|
|
By:
Sunwolves nilled! Who would have seen that coming?!?
|
|
By:
That was a turn up, but it was good to get money back after first game with no sweat.Highlanders looked like they were back to their best.
Lots of good games this weekend, Fridge full, what could go wrong ...... |
|
By:
Loads of changes again this morning from when the Canes and the Chiefs shared the spoils a few weeks back.
The 'Canes do look stronger, on paper, at least.... |
|
By:
Embarrassing from the Chiefs.
|
|
By:
Think Waratahas will be to strong for the Sharks,very good home record against them even if is a new Home ground
|
|
By:
Ditto
|
|
By:
Well, that red card will probably change things....
|
|
By:
'Tahs are dumb. That's a yellow all day long and has been for several years.
|
|
By:
Stupid, really didnt need that , it was still a tight game
|
|
By:
Stormers have a good record against The Bulls,but Bulls beat them by 40-3 last time they met not so long ago, so a bit confused at the betting here even allowing for home advantage.
Lay of the Stormers opening play for me. |
|
By:
Unlike you boys i don't watch much Super 14 but i'm tuning in for this game in Argentina. Don't know much about it but decided to lay the Jags.
|
|
By:
out for a profit very strange match odds betting
|
|
By:
big chunk wanting to lay jag at 1.6
|
|
By:
someone on crack. Jags 1.42 pre match. Jags went 5-0 up. Jags could be backed @ 1.6
![]() . |
|
By:
Sound very much like a Lumpy play. He takes a view, picks a price and isn't ever too worried about the state of play at the particular time. Also, if you want to get matched in a thin market, the only way you're going to do so is if you're looking for a skinnier price than it should be.
|
|
By:
CRU 14-18 SHA after 68
|
|
By:
sharks 4up with 11mins left at the crusaders, this would be insane carnage
|
|
By:
sup lata |
|
By:
wow a pen kick for 7up!
|
|
By:
Morning mate!
|
|
By:
These rotations have made this such a lottery this year
|
|
By:
choked it
|
|
By:
He did that to the last one, but it was a bit closer so got away with it
|
|
By:
yeh
|
|
By:
cant miss this time!
|
|
By:
Beat me to it
|
|
By:
crusaders
1.06 £26 £400 1.07 £24,545 1.08 £12 £12,712 1.09 £6,797 1.10 £1 £15,901 1.11 £1,415 1.12 £11,623 1.13 £96 £5,425 1.14 £495 1.15 £197 1.16 £78 £77 1.17 £1,100 1.18 £410 £2,390 1.19 £71 £1,010 1.2 £941 1.21 £936 1.22 £61 £1,566 1.23 £2,473 1.24 £1,397 1.25 £4,233 £1,856 1.26 £1,742 1.27 £6,139 1.28 £5,619 1.29 £380 1.3 £1,048 1.31 £308 1.32 £1,184 1.33 £26 £342 1.34 £42 1.36 £71 1.37 £20 1.38 £543 1.39 £397 1.4 £774 1.41 £646 1.43 £2,233 1.44 £70 1.45 £1,174 1.46 £1,160 1.47 £507 1.48 £31 1.49 £1,333 1.5 £1,980 1.51 £125 1.53 £9,584 1.54 £459 1.55 £1,228 1.56 £103 1.6 £1,597 1.61 £50 1.62 £26 1.63 £394 1.64 £90 1.65 £152 1.66 £1,029 1.67 £44 1.68 £80 1.69 £1,903 1.7 £132 1.71 £1,415 1.72 £74 1.73 £728 1.74 £594 1.75 £668 1.76 £2 1.77 £920 1.78 £44 1.79 £19 1.8 £1,362 1.81 £59 1.83 £474 1.85 £192 1.89 £18 1.9 £270 1.92 £7 1.94 £0 1.95 £1 1.99 £465 2.00 £328 £1,224 2.04 £3 2.06 £44 2.1 £363 2.18 £80 2.2 £108 2.22 £400 £6 2.26 £96 2.28 £36 2.30 £200 2.36 £9 2.4 £2 2.46 £13 2.5 £3 2.86 £333 £37 2.88 £61 2.9 £16 2.94 £9 2.98 £7 3.00 £338 £125 3.20 £246 3.25 £38 3.30 £200 3.40 £110 3.50 £155 £8 4.5 £24 4.8 £10 5.4 £1 5.9 £2 6 £19 7 £0 8.4 £8 32 £0 50 £0 100 £0 |
|
By:
Missed the start. Was the 1.07/1.08 pre KO?
|
|
By:
yeh
|
|
By:
the handicap was -21.5 iirc
|