|
By:
"I'm not really sure how that's been given"
|
|
By:
stevo spot on, he should come out and explain himself or hes left open to suggestions that something not quite right.
|
|
By:
Fair play Stevo. Ganson is a FRAUD
|
|
By:
He can't.
Once again, what we need is to have each video ref on the mic, live the viewers going through the process of the decision. I am convinced if Ganson had to talk out loud about that he could not have given the try. BBC have got it for the CC this year and it needs to be on all matches across both codes ASAP. |
|
By:
thats the worst decision ive ever seen in sport either he doesnt understand the rules or hes had a massive bet on hull not pocket talking dont support either team and hadnt had a bet. but thats the only conclusion i can come to
|
|
By:
Premier sports has it with the Championship games as well and it's pretty good. That isn't an error, it's cheating. I backed Hull so I should be happy, but you don't want to see stuff like that
|
|
By:
i agree. There cannot have been a more considered (ie decision wasn't instanteous, and was constantly replayed/pored over before being made) incorrect decision in any sport.
|
|
By:
The whole point of the video ref is so decisions like that are made correctly. Sometimes even with the video you can see both sides of the argument but on that its so blatantly offside that it should have been 1 look and then no try
|
|
By:
Bad timing by one of the sports but at least i'll get to watch one of the games today.
|
|
By:
lol, gsm in a hurry
|
|
By:
I think so too. Cannot see Saints coming back into this one after a short turnaround and cannot imagine Wire gifting them tries like Leeds did.
|
|
By:
Well done Saints - that took some finishing
|
|
By:
astonishing game at times
![]() |
|
By:
Kept backing Saints up to that try... Those 1.1s were way too low, but looks like Lumpy's got one right.
|
|
By:
I've not seen Lumpy today. Has he been around?
|
|
By:
Don't think so - but he appeared in taking Wire down from 1.26 to 1.13 before they scored to go 24-10 up.
|
|
By:
Lumpy backs 1.03 when Saints have scored??
|
|
By:
How is a 14 point game 1.03. Hello anyone?!
|
|
By:
agree on short side, that said hard to see warrington not scoring at least 1 more try
|
|
By:
got some 1.04 lay after that try
|
|
By:
blimey still 1.06
|
|
By:
This price is insane. It would normally be 1.2.
|
|
By:
I laid a HUGE amount at 1.03 at 30-14. Looking to reduce my red now but very little about.
|
|
By:
might get interesting now
|
|
By:
This market is bonkers. It's like no-one is watching the game.
|
|
By:
This market won't wake up unless saints get within one score
|
|
By:
Mr lumpy must have enormous confidence!
Or he's forgotten about his positions and is watching the soccer. I expect Wire to hold on and get the next score, but this market...! |
|
By:
Not to be but certainly short esp after try to make it 22-30
|
|
By:
great stuff Ratchford outstanding but i,d give m.o.m to Morley for that lol
|
|
By:
http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/bradford-bulls/when-the-weekend-s-magic-just-vanished-for-ganson-1-5709181
|
|
By:
http://www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk/Derby-reaction-Sandercock-demands-Ganson-apology/story-19089068-detail/story.html#axzz2ULZu5SPC
he watched it half a dozen times stinks |
|
By:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/rugbyleague/article-1301319/Referee-Steve-Ganson-arrested-ahead-Challenge-Cup-semi-final.html
|
|
By:
Salford vs Widnes thoughts?
|
|
By:
First Try (Under 6:45) @ 1.80
|
|
By:
Commentators are still confused about the advantage rule then.
|
|
By:
**** fest
|
|
By:
Anybody backed the 0-0?
![]() |
|
By:
Anyone that bought points @ 64 will be sweating now!
|
|
By:
this is not even grounded never mind the markers
|
|
By:
Glad I ignored the great weather to sit inside and watch this today.
|