Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
MoneyBagger
27 Mar 12 16:02
Joined:
Date Joined: 15 Mar 05
| Topic/replies: 2,846 | Blogger: MoneyBagger's blog
A very lenient punishment for being found guilty of biting another player, particular given his previous record.
Pause Switch to Standard View Dylan Hartley banned 8 weeks
Show More
Loading...
Report TheVis March 27, 2012 4:06 PM BST
Have Eng got a tour coming up?
Report MoneyBagger March 27, 2012 4:08 PM BST
SA in June....convenient that
Report tomdavid March 27, 2012 4:42 PM BST
Suprise suprise, he doesn't miss any England games, i'm really deeply shocked. Why don't the English Rugby Union dispense with these citing commitees that concern any English Squad players and and give their own punishment. Oh wait might aswell leave things as they are, it's not as if they lose any player for games do they.
Plus would love to hear what mitigating factors that got the minimum ban reduced by a futher 4 weeks, can't have been his previous good behaviour, as in other cases.
Report furrelli March 27, 2012 7:21 PM BST
previous shoulda counted & increase bans everytime until it gets throu' the skull.....
Report RugbyMan March 27, 2012 8:06 PM BST
Some players are impervious though Furelli. Plenty knocking around that just keep picking up bans well into their thirties. I doubt Hartley will ever learn. He has been relatively clean for 4 years though.

It was an independent committee that passed judgement and the main problem they have is that they dont appear to have a direct view of the incident. It's difficult to give a long ban on the basis of "you probably did it didn't you, own up". IF Ferris had his finger lodged in Hartley's mouth it makes a massive difference to the extent of the crime and if they cant tell where it was they cant pass a hefty judgement.

What I am hoping is that Callum Clark gets a year or more for his crime. Clear cut and savage. No better opportunity to stamp a foot down.
Report tomdavid March 27, 2012 8:34 PM BST
Maybe a chance with Clark's ban, unless of course he is to be picked for the SA tour.
Report furrelli March 27, 2012 8:56 PM BST
should be inside for that for a few months. not sure about hartley cleaning his act up mind, jus think he's improved his dark arts skullduggery.....
Report RugbyMan March 27, 2012 9:01 PM BST
I'm not sure if you could make it a criminal case, but I would say that Hawkins has excellent grounds to sue Clark. It's happened before and in this case intent can hardly be denied.
Report furrelli March 27, 2012 9:03 PM BST
abh for sure, maybe even gbh, sports field or know you can still go to trial if charges are pressed
Report GPT March 28, 2012 6:53 AM BST
Wasn't the minimum 12 weeks?
Report MoneyBagger March 28, 2012 10:32 AM BST
Hartley expressed his disappointment at the length of his suspension.

“I am disappointed by the result and I will wait for the written judgement as to how the panel came to their conclusion,” he said. “I now have to put it behind me and focus on supporting Saints in training and off the field.”



Min is 12 weeks, however it was reduced by 4 weeks for mitigation.
Report capewine March 28, 2012 2:49 PM BST
in mitigation....presumably he's been taught his evil ways by the other crims in this vile club.
                    Wac.
Report prism March 29, 2012 4:57 PM BST
.
Report tomdavid April 1, 2012 4:11 PM BST
So part of the testimony for the defence that Rowntree gave that Hartley would captain England in the near future, glad that clears it up then, a maybe future captain cannot surely have committed such an offence.
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com