Politics
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
16 Apr 26
16:23
Joined:
Date Joined:
11 Aug 21
Starmer needs to resign today.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 166
|
By:
it should be a resigning matter but such are the standards in politics today starmer will just try and ignore it and carry on regardless.
|
|
By:
Starmer would have told them he gets the job end off story .
|
|
By:
I make you right jolly, slippery Starmer always shifts the blame elsewhere
 Did you ever look at that photo of our old teachers i linked to a while back ? https://www.facebook.com/groups/519896084837305/members As you are a bit younger than me you may recognise a few more than me, Sludge, Dagger, dippy, trog, Mortimer, Dave Lee and Ben Gunn are there amongst others  Just click on the photo to enlarge it. |
|
By:
Technically this should be enough. Real question for the Mp's to answer now.
|
|
By:
i am not on facebook and it wouldnt let me see dixie.
|
|
By:
Mandelson not sacked for stuff starmer knew.
He shouldn't have been appointed, but would still be in place had he not been accused of passing privileged information to somebody. Maybe they should all be sacked over this, including farrage who thought he was an excellent appointment despite being a mate of epstein too. They all knew, George Clarke another one in same circles |
|
By:
No.10 now saying the decision to ignore the vetting failure was taken by a Foreign Office official and neither Lammy nor Starmer knew until earlier this week!
It is unbelievable this info wasn't passed to Lammy and from Lammy on to Starmer. |
|
By:
cos its not
 |
|
By:
Get the lectern out.
|
|
By:
You expect the Shameless heap to resign Norb
 will be wiped out in the Elections and head over to meet his Mates Manny and Vlod for a few days |
|
By:
Arguably the most important Ambassador role and Starmer thinks it is believable he neither asked or was told the result of the vetting .
|
|
By:
Starmer knew, but thought he could get away with it. How many more F*** ups will he be involved in before the party acts.
|
|
By:
The most senior official at the Foreign Office is leaving his post, after the decision to fail Lord Mandelson's security vetting for the role of US ambassador was overruled by his department.
Its comical TBH |
|
By:
You are telling me that starmer did not know anything about this
If that is the case How and Why ? |
|
By:
Why would the FO be covering for Mandleson ? Starmer had to know what was going on
|
|
By:
Does this Olly Robins, the most senior civil servant at the Foreign Office, not speak to this then boss David Lammy?
No wonder the government is a shambles. |
|
By:
We're supposed to believe that they only just figured this out
It's a slow death to be fair. |
|
By:
he failed to take his pets to a shop
|
|
By:
This really is bizarre.
|
|
By:
Starmer should have known about Mandelson's behaviour under the Blair Government never mind what he was up to with Epstein so any vetting should have been unnecessary. Mandelson was not suitable to be an MP never mind a minister or an Ambassador. It creates doubt about not only the Government and the Prime Minister but about the Security Services. Did they not have Mandelson watched?
|
|
By:
They've tied themselves up in knots since taking office, but this is on another level. We kind of new it before but now it's thoroughly exposed that the civil service are batting for the liberalists. Unfortunately it broken beyond repair, the blob are captured at all levels, plus of course, the legacy broadcast media. Even this latest fudge was timed to give Starmer a few days to prepare more lies.
|
|
By:
Only one positive, they didn't get away with cancelling next months elections (yet another scandal!). And we ought to see the annihilation of the labour project.
However the rot is so deep, we can't even have absolute faith that they will be operated fairly. |
|
By:
The FO have not informed number 10 that that the man they are making US AMBASSADOR failed vetting ,incredulous does not cover it
Why have they not informed Starmer , That's Starmers problem imo , Mcsweeney and Robins thrown under the Bus , that Lammy or Starmer never knew is no excuse ,one of them should have known or made it their business to know , its impossible one of them would not know we are being fed total pony .. |
|
By:
Next up the Escape to France to meet his mate Manny , they are going to open the Straits of Hormuz
Starmer is a Shameless Shambles |
|
By:
Toast.
|
|
By:
He has twice made statements that full Vetting has been carried out and all was well , He has lied to the country
HE MUST NOW GO He also knew about all this on Tuesday , has said Nothing, The Guardian broke the news , how much longer do we have to listen to Starmer spinning yarns |
|
By:
Next up the Escape to France to meet his mate Manny , they are going to open the Straits of Hormuz
Trump says they are now Open Oil Price has plunged by 10 % |
|
By:
Not supporting starmer in any shape or form but why did CIA or FBI approve Mandelson to be Brit ambassador to visit USA on serious business in USA
These people I assume knew everything about Epstein and his associates, very strange cos I have visited USA and it’s tight loads of questions asked |
|
By:
It’s quite a responsible position this and must have been agreed with USA and I’m surprised that starmer had not been informed that there was a potential issue either by his own team or USA agents
Seems very strange |
|
By:
For avoidance of doubt lads before I get sued,I’m not saying mandelson has ever done anything wrong
|
|
By:
You are asking the right questions malay
I doubt we get answers. Does rather leave starmer looking stupid, but... |
|
By:
PM's saying they were in the dark and the last to know rarely plays well
|
|
By:
I doubt they were informed he had Failed Vetting MALAY , looks like a massive cover up , But why ?
Kemi has just roasted Starmer . his time is up , and good riddance |
|
By:
[ This image is no longer available. ]
|
|
By:
If that is True its over , end of story
|
|
By:
Bbc
Why did Mandelson fail vetting? Developed vetting is said to be a highly personal process. It's unlikely we will see full details of the questions asked and answers given. But will the public be told what the concerns were? Why were those concerns overruled? Why did officials in the Foreign Office make the decision to go ahead with the appointment? Mandelson had already been announced - would it have been too embarrassing to cancel it? Or were mitigations found to address the concerns? At the moment, we simply don't know. Surely starmer needs to answer these on Monday,... Or go. |
|
By:
Robbins wasnt in the foreign office in 22 , He has still been booted ,WTF is going on ?
|
|
By:
22?
|
|
By:
Starmer might want to claim asylum in France rather than come back. Have they found the missing phone yet? the one alledgedly taken by the untraceable and invisible black man? Labour happy to use a racial stereotype when it suits them.
|