|
By:
Sorry SNC......just started a fred bout this.....didnt see this one
![]() |
|
By:
NP mate
|
|
By:
Will the Taliban be invited ?
|
|
By:
nanny, you know full well that if the Taliban want to come to the UK then they are to use Macron's boat service!
|
|
By:
Afghans 19 times more likely to commit sex crimes than UK indigenous.
They are from a medieval land and have no place here, but we'll just have to put up with it because Governments tell us to. |
|
By:
My daughter is coming up to 10 yrs of age .....a time when she starts to want a bit of independence ......I wont be letting her out of my sight due to the sorry state of our streets
![]() |
|
By:
Will Mad ED be offering them 4 k towards a new car ?
Two nationalities – Afghans and Eritreans – were more than 20 times more likely to account for sexual offence convictions than British citizens ... 1 in 4 Sex Crimes in the UK committed by Non British Whats the Somalian rate ,anyone know ? |
|
By:
This has only come about because the British lapdog allowed itself to get dragged into America's war in Afghanistan 2001 - 2014.
|
|
By:
Them figures are shocking , where's all the Liberal Lefties on here who keep shouting racist ?
|
|
By:
The Afghans turned into sex cases because we got involved in a War Blake ?
|
|
By:
Young grand daughter Dancing I fear for her Future in this Country
|
|
By:
It is becomming a lawless Sh1t Tip
|
|
By:
So yet another Tory mess the Labour government are having to clear up.
|
|
By:
It's not much burden for the grown ups, they'll be showering
these people with our money. |
|
By:
We have record numbers arriving Donnie , the Tories are long gone , The Energy Expert will sort them all new cars
I suggest they start building new prisons ,and quickly |
|
By:
Thread is about your beloved tory party feckin up
again and using tax payer monets to cover it up Hey ho, |
|
By:
Old Nanny. I didn't say the Afghans 'turned into sex cases' because we got involved in America's War in Afghanistan did I?
Thousands of Afghans are being relocated to the UK as part of a secret £850 million scheme set up after a personal data leak on who supported British forces during the 2001 - 2014 War. A dataset containing the personal information of almost 20,000 people who applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy was released in error in February 20022 by a defence official. The breach resulted in the creation of a secret Afghan relocation scheme, the Afghan Response Route in April 2024. None of the above would have happened if the UK hadn't got dragged into America's adventure in Afghanistan 2001 - 2014. |
|
By:
August 2021 withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan, which saw the Taliban retake power and quickly surround the capital Kabul.
The leak involved the names of people who had applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) scheme, which the UK government set up to rapidly process applications by people who feared reprisals from the Taliban and move them to the UK. The evacuation has already been heavily criticised in the years since it was launched, with a 2022 inquiry by the Foreign Affairs Committee finding it was a "disaster" and a "betrayal". When the government set up a new relocation scheme last year in response to the leak, members of the press quickly learned about the plans. The government asked a judge to impose a superinjunction on the media, preventing outlets by law from reporting any detail. Healey told the House even he had been prevented from speaking about the breach because of the "unprecedented" injunction, after being informed while still shadow defence secretary. Reading a summary of his judgment in court, Mr Justice Chamberlain said the the gagging order had "given rise to serious free speech concerns". He continued: "The superinjunction had the effect of completely shutting down the ordinary mechanisms of accountability which operate in a democracy. "This led to what I describe as a 'scrutiny vacuum'." Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge, who was in government when the secret scheme was established, said "this data leak should never have happened and was an unacceptable breach of all relevant data protocols". Erin Alcock, a lawyer for the firm Leigh Day, which has assisted hundreds of Arap applicants and family members, called the breach a "catastrophic failure". |
|
By:
The previous government set up a secret Afghan relocation scheme after the personal data of thousands of people was inadvertently leaked, it can be revealed.
The details of nearly 19,000 people who had applied to move to the UK after the Taliban takeover of the country were released by a British defence official in February 2022. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) learned of the breach in August 2023 and created a new resettlement scheme nine months later. It has seen 4,500 Afghans arrive in the UK, with a further 600 people and their immediate families still to arrive. The existence of the leak and scheme was kept secret for more than three years after the government obtained a superinjunction. Details of the major data breach, the response and the number of Afghans granted the right to live in the UK as a result were only made public on Tuesday after a High Court judge ruled the gagging order should be lifted. The leak contained the names, contact details and some family information of people potentially at risk of harm from the Taliban. The government also revealed on Tuesday: The secret scheme - officially called the Afghan Relocation Route - has cost £400m so far, and is expected to cost a further £400m to £450m The scheme is being closed down, but relocation offers already made will be honoured The breach was committed mistakenly by an unnamed official at the MoD People whose details were leaked were only informed on Tuesday Speaking in the House of Commons, Defence Secretary John Healey offered a "sincere apology" to those whose details had been included in the leak, which came to light when some details appeared on Facebook. He said it was as a result of a spreadsheet being emailed "outside of authorised government systems", which he described as a "serious departmental error" - though the Metropolitan Police has already decided a police investigation was not necessary. Healey said the leak was "one of many data losses" related to the Afghanistan evacuation during that period, and contained the names of senior military officials, government officials, and MPs. The MoD has declined to say how many people may have been arrested or killed as a result of the data breach, but Healey told MPs an independent review had found it was "highly unlikely" an individual would have been targeted solely because of it. He said that review had also judged the secret scheme to be an "extremely significant intervention" given the "potentially limited" risk posed by the leak. In a High Court judgement issued on Tuesday, Mr Justice Chamberlain said it was "quite possible" that some of those who saw the Facebook post containing the leaked personal data "were Taliban infiltrators or spoke about it to Taliban-aligned individuals". BBC News has seen an email sent to those impacted by the breach, which urges them to "exercise caution", and take steps like protecting their online activities and not responding to messages from unknown contacts. Healey said those who have been relocated to the UK have already been counted in immigration figures. 'Unprecedented' Tuesday's disclosure dates back to the August 2021 withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan, which saw the Taliban retake power and quickly surround the capital Kabul. The leak involved the names of people who had applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) scheme, which the UK government set up to rapidly process applications by people who feared reprisals from the Taliban and move them to the UK. The evacuation has already been heavily criticised in the years since it was launched, with a 2022 inquiry by the Foreign Affairs Committee finding it was a "disaster" and a "betrayal". When the government set up a new relocation scheme last year in response to the leak, members of the press quickly learned about the plans. The government asked a judge to impose a superinjunction on the media, preventing outlets by law from reporting any detail. Healey told the House even he had been prevented from speaking about the breach because of the "unprecedented" injunction, after being informed while still shadow defence secretary. Reading a summary of his judgment in court, Mr Justice Chamberlain said the the gagging order had "given rise to serious free speech concerns". He continued: "The superinjunction had the effect of completely shutting down the ordinary mechanisms of accountability which operate in a democracy. "This led to what I describe as a 'scrutiny vacuum'." Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge, who was in government when the secret scheme was established, said "this data leak should never have happened and was an unacceptable breach of all relevant data protocols". Erin Alcock, a lawyer for the firm Leigh Day, which has assisted hundreds of Arap applicants and family members, called the breach a "catastrophic failure". |
|
By:
There will always be people pointing out why we can't stop importing trouble
at great, and increasingly unaffordable, expense. It's easier than stopping it. |
|
By:
Reading a summary of his judgment in court, Mr Justice Chamberlain said the the gagging order had "given rise to serious free speech concerns".
He continued: "The superinjunction had the effect of completely shutting down the ordinary mechanisms of accountability which operate in a democracy. "This led to what I describe as a 'scrutiny vacuum'." Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge, who was in government when the secret scheme was established, said "this data leak should never have happened and was an unacceptable breach of all relevant data protocols". Erin Alcock, a lawyer for the firm Leigh Day, which has assisted hundreds of Arap applicants and family members, called the breach a "catastrophic failure". |
|
By:
Rishi started this scheme, Starmer carried it on.
What we need is a PM who actually cares about British people. Yes I know that is outrageously racist! |
|
By:
There are certain individuals who would claim Rishi Sunak isn't British.
![]() |
|
By:
Healey apologises to almost 19,000 Afghans
Where is the apology to the British tax payer? |
|
By:
Sunak too busy earning
|
|
By:
SirNorbertClarke15 Jul 25 14:42Joined: 11 Aug 21 | Topic/replies: 14,619 | Blogger: SirNorbertClarke's blog
Rishi started this scheme, Starmer carried it on. Uniparty In every which way Powerful factions have these fraudulent puppet mugs in the pocket in every Western economy lockstep race to the bottom |
|
By:
Any independent, non-puppet parties I can vote for in Germany?
|
|
By:
Doubt it edy
My knowledge of German politics is severely limited It all seems very wrapped up though, don't ya think ? Even if you could would it make a blind bit of difference |
|
By:
Tierschutzpartei sounds independent to me.
Of course there is a certain wrap, corset though. We have a constitutional order. |
|
By:
I do know there has been a movement to outright ban the AFD though which doesn't seem particularly democratic..
What say u ? |
|
By:
Of course it is democratic to ban parties if they do not agree to uphold the constitutional, democratic order.
|
|
By:
Nazis still banned, have to hang out somewhere.
Maybe unban Nazis see what happens to afd. |
|
By:
It's not that hard to not get banned really. Just be quiet about wanting to create a caliphate or fourth reich and you will not be banned.
|
|
By:
So the parties with the votes right now are following that script themselves ?
Seems to be a few sidesteps here and there from the norm, say here and the US for example |
|
By:
Again, just a guess but as the far right grow in opposition to what we've seen the past few years there will be a provisional angle to furnish those voters with what they demand ..... another guess is that they are purely wolves in sheep's clothing
or more like wolves in wolves clothing to catch would be wolves who don't actually know they are sheep yet ![]() Trump has a bulging net already |
|
By:
It's all wrapped up in a bundle of deceit and the lies get more mahoosive as we enter uncharted territory
|
|
By:
Irony not dead with leopard
|
|
By:
Sorry, what script? Respect for the constitutional order? Yes, the parties of the political centre in Germany tend to respect the constitutional order as their voters of silent, broad majority expects from them.
|
|
By:
|