|
By:
Not at all, that's why you have an appeal system.
It was a contentious matter, with little precedent to rely on, they delivered a verdict that they believed was correct. Upon appeal, with a representation of the relevant evidence, the wiser and more experienced heads of the Supreme Court found differently. |
|
By:
Eu republican stooges
|
|
By:
All 11?
|
|
By:
How are they wrong please tell us we wait your opinion
|
|
By:
They are wrong because it is wrong to insist that is a different reason that boris prorogued
He gave a reason. , the reason was legal |
|
By:
Anything else is conjecture and open to political bias ( from the judges and others)
|
|
By:
If the reason he gave was illegal fair enough
It wasn’t |
|
By:
It was illegal as ruled today.
|
|
By:
They’re wrong
|
|
By:
for the reasons I’ve given
|
|
By:
You know more than the Supreme Court judges do you?
|
|
By:
don't encourage him
![]() |
|
By:
I think they are wrong. And the high court judges were right
|
|
By:
I think the attorney general was correct also
|
|
By:
For the reasons I have given
|
|
By:
go and have another little sleep lfc
![]() |
|
By:
Someone asked how were they wrong jolly
I just answered :) I’m polite like that |
|
By:
You must always question the motives behind the judges
That what the judges themselves have done in this case They haven’t stuck to the law , they’re gone beyond that So their motives likewise must be questioned |
|
By:
They have stuck to the law, it's very clearly stated in their judgement.
|
|
By:
that’s a matter of judgement , and I agree with the high court judges and the attorney general that their judgement was wrong
|
|
By:
I’ve said why
|
|
By:
And the highest judges in the land have said why they are wrong.
|
|
By:
That’s true , I think their judgement in this case is wrong
|
|
By:
If you wish to accept it uncritically that’s up to you
I don’t |
|
By:
Don’t think we had a Supreme Court until fairly recently
Need to look at the political background and indeed views of judges certainly in cases such as this with political aspects that they might be biased towards |
|
By:
laura kunsberg reporting that one of the 11 supreme court judges had a parent that once voted labour
in a council election. this could be serious, she adds .... |
|
By:
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Even the judges despise Bullingdon
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Did any of them vote Brexit ?
|
|
By:
One thing we do know is we can’t trust remainers , even in high places
|
|
By:
lfc v 11 supreme high court judges,
its a toughie but on balance ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
I don’t think I need to give any reasons for that now do I ?
|
|
By:
Always question the motives behind the decision
To do that we need to know how many of those 11 voted Brexit |
|
By:
Would I trust an snp voting judge ?
Certainly not in a million years |
|
By:
A libdem voting judge ?
Not in a million years |
|
By:
Tea time
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Someone has to humour and expose them though.
|