English High Court Judges

Not at all, that's why you have an appeal system.

It was a contentious matter, with little precedent to rely on, they delivered a verdict that they believed was correct.
Upon appeal, with a representation of the relevant evidence, the wiser and more experienced heads of the Supreme Court found differently.

Eu republican stooges

All 11?

How are they wrong please tell us we wait your opinion

They are wrong because it is wrong to insist that is a different reason that boris prorogued

He gave a reason. , the reason was legal

Anything else is conjecture and open to political bias ( from the judges and others)

If the reason he gave was illegal fair enough

It wasn’t

It was illegal as ruled today.

They’re wrong

for the  reasons I’ve given

You know more than the Supreme Court judges do you?

don't encourage him

I think they are wrong.  And the high court judges were right

I think the attorney general was correct also

For the reasons I have given

go and have another little sleep lfc

Someone asked how were they wrong jolly

I just answered :) I’m polite like that

You must always question the motives behind the judges

That what the judges themselves have done in this case

They haven’t stuck to the law , they’re gone beyond that

So their motives likewise must be questioned

They have stuck to the law, it's very clearly stated in their judgement.

that’s a matter of judgement , and I agree with the high court judges and the attorney general that their judgement was wrong

I’ve said why

And the highest judges in the land have said why they are wrong.

That’s true , I think their judgement in this case is wrong

If you wish to accept it uncritically that’s up to you

I don’t

Don’t think we had a Supreme Court until fairly recently

Need to look at the political background and indeed views  of judges certainly in cases such as this
with political aspects that they might be biased towards

laura kunsberg reporting that one of the 11 supreme court judges had a parent that once voted labour
in a council election.

this could be serious, she adds ....

Even the judges despise Bullingdon

Did any of them vote Brexit ?

One thing we do know is we can’t trust remainers , even in high places

lfc v 11 supreme high court judges,

its a toughie but on balance

I don’t think I need to give any reasons for that now do I ?

Always question the motives behind the decision

To do that we need to know how many of those 11 voted Brexit

Would I trust an snp voting judge ?
Certainly not in a million years

A libdem voting judge ?
Not in a million years

Tea time

Sep 24, 2019 -- 5:51PM, lfc1971 wrote:

Did any of them vote Brexit ?

How is this relevant?

Sep 24, 2019 -- 6:06PM, n88uk wrote:

Sep 24, 2019 --  5:51PM, lfc1971 wrote:Did any of them vote Brexit ?How is this relevant?

Lol. That's why I blocked all the lfcs ages ago.

Someone has to humour and expose them though.

Norman on yer bike Tebbit accuses judges of judicial imperialism 

Norman you horrible piece of work Imperialism you bent over for it all your life

It really is an excellent judgement/ piece of work. I read it this afternoon.

Given the complexity 24 pages was actually quite concise. But it was very logical, very well constructed and readable. Note that nobody has found fault with the judgement from that perspective...... just the political accusations.

And, as I've said elsewhere it means Johnsons/Cummings/Rees-Mogg/Cox attempt to shutdown parliament cannot be repeated.

If it’s not clear to the general public , and not clear to high court judges , and not clear to
the attorney general

Then it is safe to say wherever wallflower thinks it’s an excellent piece of work and logical
can be taken with a pinch of salt

Its very clear -  Johnson acted unlawfully.  End of.

Hope that helps.

Thats all you need to understand if the logic and details underpinning the judgement defeats you.

well that’s one interpretation , others disagree
And of course as a remainer your viewpoint is suspect , at best

That’s all you need to understand if logic defeats you