Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 47 comments are related to the topic:
English High Court Judges

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 47
By:
anxious
When: 24 Sep 19 18:14
Norman on yer bike Tebbit accuses judges of judicial imperialism  LaughLaugh
By:
anxious
When: 24 Sep 19 18:16
Norman you horrible piece of work Imperialism you bent over for it all your life
By:
Wallflower
When: 24 Sep 19 18:33
It really is an excellent judgement/ piece of work. I read it this afternoon.

Given the complexity 24 pages was actually quite concise. But it was very logical, very well constructed and readable. Note that nobody has found fault with the judgement from that perspective...... just the political accusations.

And, as I've said elsewhere it means Johnsons/Cummings/Rees-Mogg/Cox attempt to shutdown parliament cannot be repeated.
By:
lfc1971
When: 24 Sep 19 18:58
If it’s not clear to the general public , and not clear to high court judges , and not clear to
the attorney general

Then it is safe to say wherever wallflower thinks it’s an excellent piece of work and logical
can be taken with a pinch of salt
By:
Wallflower
When: 24 Sep 19 19:03
Its very clear -  Johnson acted unlawfully.  End of.

Hope that helps.
By:
Wallflower
When: 24 Sep 19 19:05
Thats all you need to understand if the logic and details underpinning the judgement defeats you.
By:
lfc1971
When: 24 Sep 19 19:08
well that’s one interpretation , others disagree
And of course as a remainer your viewpoint is suspect , at best
By:
lfc1971
When: 24 Sep 19 19:09
That’s all you need to understand if logic defeats you
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com