|
By:
aka : thank you for the opology and the clarification.
|
|
By:
aka : so did you find an article/video of the incident because though I saw it some time ago I could not find it anywhere ?
|
|
By:
as I said - your view is blurred from the other side of the Channel. You clearly know nothing about what has been going on in Britain recently relating to the bearded friend's actions.
|
|
By:
I viewed it recently.
I think he was on his way to his lawyers office. If I find it again I'll post it. IF my memory serves me right it included quite an elongated 'debate' with a Muslim convert. |
|
By:
aka : Thank you.
moisok : You clearly have mistaken me for someone else. That can happen I guess but perhaps now you will confirm this ? |
|
By:
Highly ridiculed comments enpissant? Ridiculed by whom?
You've come on here and addressed nothing I have written, except to dismiss it in schoolboy fashion. In fact enpissant you don't address anything specifically anywhere, you simply attack the poster. You've got absolutely nothing to say, and appear to be nothing more than wind up merchant and a complete time waster with a chip on his shoulder. |
|
By:
Dr : You had the decency to eventually apologise about your very poor comments on another thread about the disabled. If you recall I did not resort to insulting you about it, nor did I jump on the band wagon of criticism you took. I offered an olive branch and stated I was not comfortable when one poster was being rounded on. However you clearly have carried no positive regard for me from that and so I understand you a little better now.
|
|
By:
I always wondered hoe tommy got involved with the EDL given the Irish republican background of his family.
Seemed a strange step imo. I also didn't care much for him either albeit I hadn't viewed much of him on the net. But slowly the more I've listened to him and read about him the more I've warmed to him. |
|
By:
I don't know about his background at all but my view of him is very different to yours and that's perfectly ok despite how many feel about differing views on here. I have the feeling he has changed tack for monetary reasons.
|
|
By:
If you recall I did not resort to insulting you about it,
I didn't insult you either after I corrected you for jumping to the wrong conclusion. You did apologised for that. and stated I was not comfortable when one poster was being rounded on. There was you and one other who made the same mistake, you both backed off pretty sharpish when I proved your error. You certainly show a talent for making something out of nothing. I repeat: You've got absolutely nothing to say, and appear to be nothing more than wind up merchant and a complete time waster with a chip on his shoulder. |
|
By:
Pissant never answered my question:
If fact you seem happy to see the police take a lenient view of these types. Why is that? Perhaps he could now? |
|
By:
'pissant' - super twist on my handle : not pathetically childish at all.
Well, that is a very rosy pair of glasses you have. The posts are there to either back you up or as we both know full well, prove your assertions here to be wholly false. Your highlighted question says as much about you as any crass comment you have made. |
|
By:
I don't suppose you believe the rise in anti semitism correlates with the rise of the cult either.
They are at it in copenhagen Nasty anti jewish stuff from an imam there |