Politics
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
08 Oct 16
02:59
Joined:
Date Joined:
16 Sep 03
he may not even run IMHO
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 435
|
By:
you forgot to explain why 'trump is toast' smart guy
what is the equivalence between smutty talk from 11 years ago and the issue that millions of americans who cant find jobs the latter is what is known as a 'major issue' (though not discussed in the vile corporate media) while the former amounts to nothing better than ancient trivia. the concern of any rational individual is to consider who is most likely to initiate a nuclear exchange with russia- trump or Clinton ? my money would be on Clinton for the big bang(s) every time, albeit that I would never collect on my bet |
|
By:
Main Stream Media (especially BBC and CNN) on this over 800 dead in Haiti and the document dumps on Hilary. Good time for them to release this 11 year old audio.
On Twitter for top trending #trumptapes it is about 4 comments saying why is more important than jobs, emails, security etc to 1 comment saying Trump is disgusting. Main Stream Media are trying to run the narrative as usual in favour of the globalists. Wake up America you are being played. Look over here at Trumps comments while they sell your country behind your backs. |
|
By:
Nobody's pretending Hillary is a particularly good candidate. But she's not a politically clueless sexual predator. Anybody who thinks Trump is fit to be the most powerful man in the world is almost as nuts as him.
|
|
By:
What should be the top story?
1. The Podesta Emails about the selling off USA Uranium to the Russians while the HC was secretary of state and the Clinton Foundation received massive donations or; 2. An 11 year audio of Trump talking about women? What is more important to the future of America? |
|
By:
Meanwhile, here's some information about Hillary Clinton's past misdeeds, also caught on tape.
These activities seem far more serious indeed, and far more dangerous to women, but curiously the Establishment and lefty media are trying their best to ignore them. . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcqh0gRy-og Fact Check's investigation. . http://www.factcheck.org/2016/06/clintons-1975-rape-case/ Looking forward to the BBC/Guardian/New York Times headlining with this sordid and disturbing story. |
|
By:
You're usually a bit better than that alun. THAT is pretty desperate. Defence lawyers have all defended people they think are guilty. At no point does Hillary say he told her he did it. She also made a plea bargain that got him some time. To compare somebody doing their job as a junior lawyer ( Hillary would have been in her late twenties at the time ) to the kind of obscene bragging Trump came out with 30 years later is a joke.
|
|
By:
Fox Murdoch news have practically given up on Donny they must think he is toast
|
|
By:
The GOP don't like him they realise he is not a conservative but a maverick who hijacked the GOP ticket
|
|
By:
salmon spray
08 Oct 16 11:57 Joined: 10 Jan 07 | Topic/replies: 38,511 | Blogger: salmon spray's blog You're usually a bit better than that alun. THAT is pretty desperate. Defence lawyers have all defended people they think are guilty. At no point does Hillary say he told her he did it. She also made a plea bargain that got him some time. To compare somebody doing their job as a junior lawyer ( Hillary would have been in her late twenties at the time ) to the kind of obscene bragging Trump came out with 30 years later is a joke. ..... Just so we are clear on where you stand on this Salmon, Do you 100% support a 12 year old girl who reported a sexual assault being herself accused of making it up and fantasizing about older men given the physical evidence and the fact the guy pleaded guilty to an assault offence? Do you fully support a lawyer putting a 12 year old who has already gone through this then been subjected to Hillary making these claims against her? The affect of CSA last a lifetime and the damage of the actual event is magnified so much if the child is not supported and believed. Do you also fully support Hillary laughing about the case in the 1980s and her tactics in 1975? |
|
By:
InsiderTrader
Why are you avoiding the obvious and failing to respond to the critical point - that Trump has serial character and judgement flaws that make him a danger to the economy, safety and security of all of us, not just Americans. The evidence mounts up day after day. You don't have to support HC to see Trump as a disaster - it's not too late for the Republicans to push him out of the way and get a decent candidate for the vote. Let's hope they do it. |
|
By:
good to see all the forums American experts about.
|
|
By:
Burton do you really believe Trump is going to win
|
|
By:
So HC brings up a comment about a beauty contest winner being fat and this 2005 audio as relevant.
Yet HC supporting her husband's treatment of women and suggesting a child apparently thinking about older men (at aged 12) makes an adults actions against that 12 year alright is ignored? Then her support from the Saudi's the Clinton Foundation is ignored despite their treatment of women. HC plays the woman card because Trump says bad things about women. But what about her ACTIONs against women. If she truly believed in womens rights surely she would divorce her husband (rather than support his actions) and not defend a man who unlawfully fondled a child. All the time her non-existent policies are not being debated because she has played the American people by playing this card. |
|
By:
Are you suggesting that an alleged sex offender is not entitled to a lawyer Inside Trader ?
Even Trump should have one imo. |
|
By:
Burton do you really believe Trump is going to win
why you asking me? obviously the numerous times you have visited gives you a far bigger insight into what the average Joe thinks and feels over there. I wouldn't worry what happens if I were you I'd put your efforts into getting Wurzel's Utopia established. |
|
By:
Burton Mike Pence and Paul Ryan are being backed a bit this morning, Donny might not make it to the election, no Burton I haven't visited America but I can still have an opinion , If Hilary was such a crook then why haven't the American People thrown her away
|
|
By:
A lawyer yes. Someone that subjects a victim to physcological testing and making allegations against a child should not be regarded as a great person. If you truly believed in womens/childrens rights you would not take that case.
She was laughing her head off about him passing a lie detector test. She got him to plead guilty to a lesser charge. So is there a chance she knew he was guilty. Why else laugh about the lie detector test? We are talking about a 12 year girl here yet she laughed about the case repeatedly. Is that acceptable behavior to you? |
|
By:
InsiderTrader
Why are you avoiding the obvious and failing to respond to the critical point - that Trump has serial character and judgement flaws that make him a danger to the economy, safety and security of all of us, not just Americans. The evidence mounts up day after day. You don't have to support HC to see Trump as a disaster - it's not too late for the Republicans to push him out of the way and get a decent candidate for the vote. Let's hope they do it. So what's the answer..... |
|
By:
Defence lawyers are always likely to have to defend people they think are guilty. The article I have seen about this never alleges he told Hillary he was guilty which would have made things different.
If you think any lawyer who took the case is somehow a bad person then you ARE saying sex offenders should not have any defence team. She was laughing because he passed the polygraph test which as she THOUGHT he was guilty ( and she got him to plead to a lesser charge )was making her laugh at the reliability of polygraphs. There is a hell of a difference between a junior lawyer doing her job and a bloated celebrity going about telling how he grabbed women by their private parts because he could get away with it. |
|
By:
I don't see a question there.
Why is Trump more of a danger to the economy than Clinton? What is Clinton's economic policy? On the economy last I saw Trump has a 5% lead over Clinton. His plan is to strengthen trade agreements and stop multinationals outsourcing manufacturing and selling back into the USA with no tariff. Against the globalist free trade deals. Clinton wants American jobs to be outsourced and client state. On economy/security he is against mass immigration from war zones. Clinton wants 550% increase in immigration from Syria. Good to increase immigration from war zones? On security Clinton wants to use unsecure servers to store confidential emails about government. Clinton likes the Chinese to have missile tech and Russia to control USA nuclear material. She wants war in Iraq, Syria, Libya and Yemen. She wants no 'boots on the ground' in Iraq yet there are 1000s of American troops already there. She wants people like Assad and Gadifi dead (even laughs about killing) yet only offers ISIS to replace. Trump wants Nato members to pay their way or not be protected by the USA. Why should the USA protect countries that refuse to contribute to the cost? He wants to defeat ISIS with Russia rather than go against Russia in Syria. |
|
By:
Mike Pence and Paul Ryan are being backed a bit this morning
I couldn't give a stuff how much their prices have moved they are being backed by Brits at British bookies it's totally irrelevant. |
|
By:
salmon spray
08 Oct 16 13:58 Joined: 10 Jan 07 | Topic/replies: 38,515 | Blogger: salmon spray's blog Defence lawyers are always likely to have to defend people they think are guilty. The article I have seen about this never alleges he told Hillary he was guilty which would have made things different. If you think any lawyer who took the case is somehow a bad person then you ARE saying sex offenders should not have any defence team. ... I am saying that Affidavit demanding that a 12 year child is put through psychiatric testing for the reasons given were not compatiable with someone who says CSA victims should always be believed and that they are a strong advocate for woman and girls rights. |
|
By:
Burton you don't seem able to admit that Donny has run a miserable campaign, you learn more from defeat than victory so they say
|
|
By:
I'm not really bothered what you think you keep telling everyone how much you know about the state's
 oh and if you ever plan a visit don't ask me to put you up. |
|
By:
Burton your in a foul mood again and if im in Vermont anytime I will give your son a bell and tell how cranky his old man has become
 |
|
By:
Salmon,
Please read this: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3729466/Child-rape-victim-comes-forward-time-40-years-call-Hillary-Clinton-liar-defended-rapist-smearing-blocking-evidence-callously-laughing-knew-guilty.html And then if you still think Hillary is going to transform the rights of girls and women in America if she becomes president post why you think she will. |
|
By:
Oh if it's in the Mail it must be true so I give up.
|
|
By:
The affidavit signed by HC printed in the Mail is a fake document?
|
|
By:
They are both obnoxious candidates however Hc is the lesser of the two evils. Trump is a fool and in my view totally unelectable.
|
|
By:
last debate tonight
|
|
By:
Clinton 1.3 now, will be 1.22 by Monday, Trump backers have done their nuts.
|
|
By:
3s and 7-2 now trump drifting badly now 365
|
|
By:
I wouldn't back him at 20/1.
|
|
By:
if trump quit who would be in the running?
|
|
By:
It's a bit late to replace him, imo. Many republicans have deprecated him for his comments, but they won't go as far as withdrawing their nominations. They will probably distance themselves and try to limit the damage to the Party, and try to protect their own futures. Even if it means waiting another 4 years before they can have a real chance. It is their own fault, really. They knew all along what Trump was. How did they imagine that none of it was going to get out? They should have deselected him a long time ago.
|
|
By:
just posted a new thread about the heroes - donny and vladimir -. CENSORED, as per instructions from HQ. |
|
By:
OOps. the "heroes" post is back again now.
 |
|
By:
Nothing on the BBC news website about the new WikiLeaks info. Even the Guardian managed a piece on it...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/07/wikileaks-hillary-clinton-paid-wall-street-speeches?CMP=share_btn_tw Good day to roll out the 11 year old tape of Trump when he was a TV personality. |
|
By:
Is there anything embarrassing in the latest wikileaks stuff by the way? Read the bits on various sites last night and can't say I was outraged by anything.
|