Feb 10, 2015 -- 12:25PM, cheese wrote:
I posted this before. Yes, a snp-labour alliance is probably the most likely possible outcome at the moment,but it is still significantly more likely not to happen than happen (and if you don't understand why these thingsare notcontradictory give up betting).What isn't clear to me is what the definition of "any other" is. Say Labour win outright but the Green MP or MP'sdecide to join with Labour. That's technically a coalition but I think Labour backers would be aggreived if they didn'tget paid.
How are you defining joining with Labour? If it's a Martin Bell situation where he was basically a Lab MP in all but name being whipped you'd be fine in betting terms. Also if Green MP's defected to Labour in order to form a Gov you'd be fine.
If it's a case where the Green's give tacit support to Labour issue by issue Labour minority would be settled.
Feb 11, 2015 -- 6:48PM, Meadow X1 wrote:
CJ, I am fairly certain SNP wish to contribute to the Westminster parliament but do not wish to actively disrupt it for political means.
In that case a coalition would be out in favour of propping up a min Lab Gov? Would be a big difference in betting terms.