|
By:
unbiased?
|
|
By:
You've got some neck sib, you've been swerving this forum for ages after being challenged over the black racist
|
|
By:
and house building with terrorism
|
|
By:
I swerved nothing, I don't answer every thread. And I hate all racists, including black ones.
Which doesn't answer my question about justifying building in E1. |
|
By:
Really?
So the punishment for building is public execution without trial before being dragged through the streets by motorbike. You previously shrugged your shoulders and said War is unpleasant. You are a bigot and a racist |
|
By:
Err, no. I condemned it. You will have noticed I aimed the question at unbiased, unbelievably, I take the view that he is trying harder than yourself to genuinely debate.
|
|
By:
Genuinely debate what?
Most people on here see fault on both sides, unlike yourself. You are very happy to accuse people of racism but you are clearly and unashamedly bigoted. |
|
By:
Not so long ago,2007 to be precise,Hamas threw Fatah out of Gaza in a coup that resulted in many on both sides being killed.That was the last time a Fatah representative was in Gaza.
Peaceful lot,I think not!!! For the record the keyboards weren't in action ,the "intelligentsia" remained silent.We all know why. They are,at this moment trying to join forces. |
|
By:
I very much see fault on both sides. But I do not understand the justification for taking the most sensitive land possible in response to a peaceful application to the UN. I was hoping unbiased might enlighten me.
|
|
By:
We crossed unbiased.
So then, how does that justify building on E1? |
|
By:
Been said enough times,arduous to have to repeat it,it isn't,and never has been, about land,hence no response.Listen,and learn.
Many of these Islamist groups can't wait to put a bullet in other Islamists(Sunni v Shi Ite) for starters,Hamas and Fatah,the list goes on and on, So no way is it in their make up to accept a Westernised Democracy on their doorstep.THERE LIES THE PROBLEM. Many on here fail to comprehend that simple fact,but that is what it has always been about.Simple! |
|
By:
The West Bank is run by Fatah. Which accepted Israel as a sovereign state many years ago. And that is where E1 is.
You say it isn't about land? Are you suggesting that the announcements on E1 following within hours of Palestine being accepted as an observer at the UN is some sort of coincidence? I don't think even Netanyahu is pushing that line. |
|
By:
16.46 post answers ALL questions.
|
|
By:
sibaroni
the palestinians should concentrate on making a success of the land that they do have,until they can do this they should certainly noy get any more and should stop worrying about Israel building a few houses.They have a lot of self made problems that they should address |
|
By:
your bait stinks, and your method crude, take it back to twatter.
|
|
By:
only about 20% of what might be considered historically Palestinian land is in Israel, the remaining 80%
is in Jordan, Syria and Saudi Arabia |
|
By:
unbiased - your reply doesn't begin to answer the question. I ask whether building E1 is justifiable; you said it has nothing to do with land. Hamas would always attack Israel.
But this thread is expressly about land. E1 that Israel are building on. Okay, if we accept all of your points, Hamas will never want peace etc. how does that help? What is Israel's justification for taking incredibly sensitive land it does not own? |
|
By:
go and lick the ar$es of the terrorists sib - thats all your lot do - thank goodness you have no influence and power - imagine someone like you trying to deal with these thugs
Islamists are out to eliminate any western influence - and while your are at it - pop down to leicester and parts of london to see the multiculturist efforts our past barmy rulers have participated in on our behalf. But never asked anyone. |
|
By:
I could never understand the Israeli mentality for building illegal settlement on the West Bank. By building more settlements in occupied territory they make the two state solution less viable. Thus rejecting the two state solution they are unwittingly opting for a one state solution where the simple laws of demographic will eventually ensure that Israel will cease being a Jewish state – unless it wishes to move humanity backwards by implementing an apartheid system of government.
|
|
By:
if the israelis were given full reign, they would do in that region, what germany did in europe 'twice'.
|
|
By:
manxy, you are a pr*ck. Hope this helps.
|
|
By:
did germany not annex huge swathes of europe then, wouldnt iran be a pretty big chunk for starers, jordan for mains, and egypt for afters.
|
|
By:
are you disputing that if israel had a free hand, a world that turned a blind eye, that they would not eliminate their enemies, bar none.
|
|
By:
Verybiased thinks it isn't about land.
Try telling that to the Palestininas. Because of the foundation of the state of Israel and because of the ongoing thieving or their land and homes and fams the are now about 5 million Palestinian refugees. From Wikipedia Based on the UNRWA definition, the number of original Palestine refugees has declined from 711,000 in 1950[1] to approximately 30 to 50,000 in 2012. In 2012 the number of registered patrilineal descendants of the original Palestine refugees, based on the UNRWA registration requirements, is estimated to be 4,950,000.[2][3][4][5] This would suggest its everything to do with land. It also suggests that Verybiased is a stupid turrd. However this is not news. |
|
By:
The supporters of Israeli land theft have been afflicted either with a racial bias or conned by the most sophisticated spin and media pressure campaign ever launched.
From e the Guardian recently Israel is suspected of carrying out a series of leaks implicating Iran in nuclear weapons experiments in an attempt to raise international pressure on Tehran and halt its programme. Western diplomats believe the leaks may have backfired, compromising a UN-sanctioned investigation into Iran's past nuclear activities and current aspirations. The latest leak, published by the Associated Press (AP), purported to be an Iranian diagram showing the physics of a nuclear blast, but scientists quickly pointed out an elementary mistake that cast doubt on its significance and authenticity. An article in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists declared: "This diagram does nothing more than indicate either slipshod analysis or an amateurish hoax." The leaked diagram raised questions about an investigation being carried out by International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors after it emerged that it formed part of a file of intelligence on alleged Iranian nuclear weapons work held by the agency |
|
By:
In addition, I would suggest you be very careful about dealing with any islamists. They do not have a very good record on human rights
![]() |
|
By:
In addition, I would suggest you be very careful about dealing with any islamists. They do not have a very good record on human rights
What a lot of bigoted prejudicial tripe. You should be ashamed at trying so clearly to spread religious hatred. Lets have a look at the biggest couple of mass killing of people shall we. 1. the WWII slaughter -6 millions of European Jews, and gipsies, learning disabled and mentally ill, some 25 million "sub human Russians". The culprits - must have been Muslims eh? Err no. The culprits were nice white Anglo Saxon sorts from the strong Protestant Christian stock of Martin Luther, the Germans who supported the excessive evil of Hitler by a huge majority. 2. The killing fields. Well Pol Pot was a madman and a mass killer, but he wasn't big on religion. However dear old Christians like Reagan and the Thatch armed and trained Pol Pot after the extent of the killing fields were known. Perhaps the Thatch was a closet Muslim eh Moisok? 3. The big irony of the behavior of the Israeli government is their persistent denial of human rights to the Palestinians. But hang on a second. The Israelis cannot all be Muslims as well can they? Moisok you are a really nasty bigot. |
|
By:
I would love to see you in their hands spouting your rubbish. You would be one of the first they would get rid of. Wake up and realise what you are dealing with. If I am wrong just check at what islamists are doing in many parts of the world.
|
|
By:
even the 'peaceful' islamist nations are arming insurgents
|
|
By:
'trying so clearly to spread religious hatred'
What just like all those violent islamists and their leaders ?? Note the hint that I am breaking the law by raising questions and making points about violent people who have no care for another person's way of life or religion. What is it about these hand wringers who don't want an open debate and just want to shut you up!!?? |