|
By:
i am officially not fishing. this is happening whether you choose to believe it at this point or not.
:) |
|
By:
yes but if someone is a genuine loon, as you claim...why does it seem to bother you people so much...just move along and find another thread to play in....simple really?
|
|
By:
it bothers them because it's a scary thought that the reality is actually different to how you see it. it's scary to think you've been a mug with your head in the sand, and let the media rip the absolute pi$$ out of you.
|
|
By:
not referring to u roach
|
|
By:
i'm just trying to help the guy see sense
not a strange human trait to want to help someone in need who clearly can't think straight. |
|
By:
the road to hell is paved with good intentions.... Canary. :-)
|
|
By:
exactly canary you make my point for me. no matter how ridiculous what im saying may seem to you, im actually trying to help YOU.
it saddens me that everyone is being deceived by the gov and by the media. the same with the economy, which is why i made the post on that on the poker forum before that i did. why would i post these things out of the blue?? i rarely posted on the forum before that. surely that should show you my intentions.. these things are happening whether people acknowledge them or not - i am here to help you understand that :) |
|
By:
Go on then, just to humour you, why would the mass media ignore the story of the decade?
|
|
By:
Is this the biggest whinge over a lost bet in Betfair forum history?
I've seen "Richard Hughes is **g useless" type rants run for a day or so over on the horses forum but this one must take the biscuit, surely. |
|
By:
to be fair the claim i submitted a couple of weeks ago was acknowledged and being investigated by the independent body. if there was no chance of it being honoured should the next president actually be one of my selections they would have already declined my case - but they have not. they have not, because they are waiting to see the result, likely because they know my assessment of the betting market's rules is actually correct, so they're waiting to see who is sworn in.
|
|
By:
the market rules were based on the novemeber election winner
not the swearing in |
|
By:
and lol at bf paying out everyone who layed obama or backed the winner, if something did happen which meant he wasn't sworn in :^0
|
|
By:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081208/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/cb_guantanamo_sept11_trial
[b]The five defendants said they decided on Nov. 4 |
|
By:
LOL. Refused to help out the car industries. What? I joke, but you people really do wear tinfoil hats don't you?
|
|
By:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/12/12/early-blair-house-check-in-for-obamas-unavailable/
lol.. trying for squatters rights... :) |
|
By:
I find it very amusing that Don continues to rant about the media misleading everyone on this issue & then puts up articles from the erm.. media to support his position. I stand by what I first said about him. He's a cospiracy crank, so far up his own fundament he's forgotten what daylight looks like. No offence intended.
|
|
By:
i think a lot on this thread have misunderstood the point...
im in same boat as don by sounds of it...back biden and laid obama...1000.0 and at 1.01 respectivly.. im of similar opinion and believe the market was settled incorrectly... it like a horse race.. every one thinks our horse has fallen and is offering 1000.0 wanting to back the horse crossing the finish line at 1.01 that they can see on tv...problem is that they still have another circuit to go... im still awaiting what the stewards enquiry will say when they look at all the facts.. (please no one mention putting screens round etc :) ) |
|
By:
it's irrelevant anyway because the market was settled from the nov election in accordance with the rules.
so you wouldn't get paid out if something happened anyway! ul gg gtf over it. |
|
By:
we'll see
|
|
By:
[i](Washington, DC 12/12/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obamas lack of
|
|
By:
http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/12/12/obama%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%9Cnatural-born%E2%80%9D-problem/
|
|
By:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081215/ap_on_go_pr_wh/electoral_vote;_ylt=Asf30hRAxiO2xndnub89bbWs0NUE
Whatever will you do after January 20th Roscoe. Make sure and recycle that tinfoil your hat is made of. |
|
By:
Rosco - if you are right (yeah right), why are the mainstream media ignoring the story. I would have thought Fox News for example, would be all over it.
|
|
By:
It's official: Barack Obama elected 44th president
4 hours ago RICHMOND, Va. (AP) |
|
By:
can betfair pay out now...?
|
|
By:
Where's Don?
|
|
By:
But Obama's election will not be complete until Congress tallies the outcome of Monday's Electoral College vote at a joint session scheduled for Jan. 6
|
|
By:
test
|
|
By:
thanks for posting that canary..thought you would start to see the light..
|
|
By:
Jan 8th I thought was when result announced. Got to go down as one of the most stupid bets in history, especially considering how much energy has been expended trying to persuade everyone how sensible it was!
|
|
By:
i'm sure congress can count sheriff...
|
|
By:
updates are here.
still more court cases. and existing ones being resubmitted. im being patient :) http://grou.ps/zapem/ |
|
By:
Don, have you read "Confessions of an economic hitman"?
If so, liar or truth? |
|
By:
A serious question DonWarro. What do you think are the TRUE odds of Obama becoming president?
|
|
By:
true odds of him being installed on 20th jan..?
if market was still open like it should be and if it was still at 1.01 i would be laying... |
|
By:
pmsl
|
|
By:
you get them to open market m8 on whether he gets installed on 20th jan an i will lay you all you want at 1.01
|
|
By:
Not very confident then sherrif!
|
|
By:
for the record, i still stick to what i initially said. made a few updates to the the thread on the poker board if you want to read - cant be @rsed to keep duplicating.
|
|
By:
Isn t assasination,sadly, a long held part of the us presidential scene?
|