|
By:
no he did win that
|
|
By:
he got his hand raised... he won rounds 1 and 2 and the judges will score on takedowns over pretty much anything else
|
|
By:
judges gave him a very poor win
|
|
By:
thinking about it i would of scored it a draw, round 1 was even round 2 was hioki's clearly and round 3 was clearly roop's
|
|
By:
he didnt win round 1... he took him down once, roop landed lots of good damaging shots! but as said he took him down once and layed on him for 2 mins which obv judges love!
|
|
By:
roop deserved the win for sure, thats what people want to see also!
|
|
By:
not 3 take down and 3 mins laying on somebody for 3 rounds... this is what hioki did!
|
|
By:
did you green out schnuck?
|
|
By:
only half my bet, but thats nothing to do why i feel roop should have won mate!
|
|
By:
Anyway onto Jorgensen... Odds are short but think they are deserved unlike roops odds!
|
|
By:
now one of my picks Jorgensen...
|
|
By:
fingers crossed he pulls it off... think will be a decision tho
|
|
By:
in that case the odds are incorrect so why have you bet him?
|
|
By:
think 1.22 is a lay
|
|
By:
odds are incorrect?
|
|
By:
i think most of jorgensen's wins are by decision
|
|
By:
Curran started well but Jorgensen is one mean mofo
|
|
By:
i admit anything can happen so 1.22 is short but i still think it's a decent bet in an accumulator
|
|
By:
i don't think Curran has ever been KO'd
|
|
By:
yes if its going to a decision odds shouldnt be 1.22
|
|
By:
why?
|
|
By:
because a 1.22 shot should be more clear cut
|
|
By:
GSP is always 1.20 and always wins by decision
|
|
By:
difference here is jorgensen is not just laying on curran unlike hioki did too roop!
|
|
By:
roop really got robbed there, cant believe that!
|
|
By:
it depends how dangerous the other fighter is , to make 1.22 justified
|
|
By:
if it goes to a decision i mean
|
|
By:
that's why jorgensen is 1.22 and hioki was 1.35
|
|
By:
lol 10 points is meaningless. hioki should have been 1.7 chance
|
|
By:
yeah i didnt back hioki
|
|
By:
i mean you could have got 1.6 on hioki in the last round thats how clear cut it was!!!
|
|
By:
i said i would of if i had spare cash
|
|
By:
it was very obvious to me that he was going to get a decision
|
|
By:
well yes as me and razz said we agree he would have got the decision for laying on roop for 3 mins
|
|
By:
the key thing is you have to discard your opinion and look at how the judges are viewing it
|
|
By:
but he didnt deserve it is what im arguing!
|
|
By:
totally agree razz
|
|
By:
that's what i've been trying to articulate
|
|
By:
i agree too.. just saying roop is what people want to see not boring 1 take down a round guys who are boring to watch! did hioki even land a punch? struggling to think of what he did actually do!
|
|
By:
it's not a boxing match though
|