|
By:
I stand to win a ridiculous amount of money if the panthers win their division !!
. Nice SW, what needs to happen? |
|
By:
Chefs wrecked my 6 team acca (for small beans but still).
|
|
By:
either panthers win next week or saints lose. Bad form to bump an old thread but couldnt resist the pre-season superbowl one
|
|
By:
I like your chances SW.
|
|
By:
I'm rolling with Balti again here after MNF, this team just knows how to win, and is very very good at home.
|
|
By:
Good calling, Swardean and Dirk...
If Patriots don't come through, you'll be unlucky.....injury-free I think they are the best in AFC. I know Chiefs lost this week, but I think that Bengals, Colts, Chiefs and maybe Ravens (or Chargers) are going to be a minefield for the currently favoured Patriots / Broncos.....I'll be investigating into laying them both - see if I get value. |
|
By:
I said a few weeks ago, that Ravens would be real contenders if they had held on to Boldin for one more year. Still think they'll regret it.
|
|
By:
Recent superbowls have been won ny hot teams, giants and ravens, are ravens getting hot again?
|
|
By:
Congrats to my Texans on another loss - the draft is going according to plan
![]() |
|
By:
Sherman !!!! MVP contender
|
|
By:
The Ravens lost 4 of their last 5 regular season games last year so no way you could consider them hot going into the playoffs
|
|
By:
gl with carolina nfc south swardean.
had big plus on saints and was laying at 1,15 moved it upp to 1,25 just before the big 1,10 came in and missed all of it. only medium green as it was. go patriots |
|
By:
Bullshit call there, defender was looking at the ball & Edelman ran into HIM
|
|
By:
You're right DB, didnt check but had it in my head they came with a late rattle.
Come on the pats!!! |
|
By:
...tough call on Ravens....when the receiver ran back into Jimmy Smith, it was just natural for him to put hands-up like that..
.....its my main gripe with NFL, soft pass interference calls |
|
By:
Ravens got red hot in the post season. I actually remembered it as a late reg surge.
|
|
By:
Nice 'Hero Tom' call.
|
|
By:
bugger
|
|
By:
Need a Ravens win either here or next week to win the > 8.5 wins from pre-season. Wrote this off weeks ago, can't believe it still has a chance of wining at that stage. Jet < 6.0 wins only lost today as well - wrote that off months ago!
|
|
By:
patriots 15 for superbowl winner. what the odds if gronk was healty? 8
|
|
By:
They would be 5.0 if their defensive line was fit , the swede, never mind gronk
|
|
By:
lol did flacco just fall over his own feet?
![]() |
|
By:
this one is over
![]() |
|
By:
Flacco looks like he is not interested at all. Can't believe that Ravens aren't psyched for this. Win next 2 weeks and they win the division.
|
|
By:
I wish it was but that fat lady doesn`t like me.
![]() |
|
By:
should have had more on new england over 12 ;)
but games usually ends i Q4 |
|
By:
If I were to suggest a good bet it would be overs in the Baltimore game, now that the weather is clear.
|
|
By:
From 0-14 in 10 years, these are their matches' total points.
59 65 57 75 77 42 |
|
By:
New England, that is.
|
|
By:
Baltimore havent had a 0-14.
|
|
By:
They had a 0-13 which finished with 61 pts.
|
|
By:
Does the 17-0 change the stats S*A
|
|
By:
SoA, please ease off on the statistics........of very very limited value
Srichaphan or Ancic? 22 Dec 13 17:59 Statistics suggest these bets.. Carolina v New Orleans AWAY 17-13 New York Jets v Cleveland AWAY 23-13 St Louis v Tampa Bay AWAY 24-14 are the most profitable today. |
|
By:
No they're not. They're the single way to consistently make a profit on sports.
|
|
By:
No, Swardean, because they haven't had anything more than a 0-14 advantage. The 0-17 just helps the overs be more likely imo.
|
|
By:
I love h2h stats and this has a bearing on my bets
|
|
By:
even they have some importance.
|
|
By:
didn't know the 0-17 was in the second quarter, so that has a lesser effect imo.
|
|
By:
SoA,
...... after any result you could pull up any statistic to "suggest" an outcome....depends which one or ones you take. As I posted above.....you posted that somehow "statistics suggested 3 bets"...... they all lost by the way. But if I could have been bothered I could have found 3 statistics which would have "suggested" the 3 winners. Nonsense really, attempting to make a science out of something that is not. |
|
By:
Defensive Holding WTF!!!!!!
Refs didn't even call a number |