
|
By:
Agree 100% about the patriots. 11/10 seems too good to be true
![]() |
|
By:
Iggles especially stonking with AP and Gerhart out, I got 5.5.
Like NE pick, they can also always rely on a laughable PI call when they need one. |
|
By:
Have to have the pats at the price.
|
|
By:
0/4 so far Clay, tough week.
|
|
By:
NOT A GOOD DAY SO FAR OP
|
|
By:
Don`t pack in your day job.
|
|
By:
WOULDA LOOKED LESS OF A DOUCHE IF HE JUST KEPT IT TO ONE PARAGRAPH INSTEAD OF GOING ALL PROFESSIONAL ON US.
|
|
By:
He just bets against teams and people he hates and wonders why he keeps losing...
|
|
By:
THATS 2/7 BY MY CALCULATIONS
|
|
By:
3 / 8 for the week so far (had Chargers on Thursday)......Steelers to beat Bengals to come.
|
|
By:
331 views. I've finally figured out that all those views are just for the humour factor, certainly not for the riveting selections. And no rash man, nice to see your two, count em' two, rashes have cleared up Clay, I can't pick the point handicap any better. Picking and betting the handicaps is a mugs game. Pick 56 % and you're a multi millionaire. I think there are 2 to 5 people who can do it, and Clay certainly isn't one of them.
I guess we can add Andy Daulton to Clay's list of most hated QBs. The most hated is Cutler. Clue in Clay, Tressman played Cutler today because he thinks he's better then what's his name. Marc Tressman, the guy who's baby toe has more football knowledge then you will ever have thinks Cutler is better then McGowan. Now shut TF up. Look at the in depth reasoning on the late game. Can't stand Daulton. So what. The guy can play. Cold it Steel town tonight. So what. Is Cincy in the tropics ? Cincy has all but guaranteed their playoff spot. Really. Can you read stats. 2 games above Baltimore. Pitts need to win for the wildcard chance. They need to win, because they've stunk it up this year. Besides, they need to win, so effin what ? Cincy far better at home. They're 3 and 4 on the road. What does far better at home matter, when they're in the top third as a road team. Look it up ****. Pittsburgh will be far more motivated. Hell, I guess Cincy should just mail it in. Newsflash to Clay. Cincy hates Pittsburgh, and they have all the motivation any team will ever have to beat another. Pittsburgh may well win, that's not the point. The point is that your reasoning for almost every pick is laughable. God help the muppets who actually think you know what you're talking about. |
|
By:
so who wins standing chap?
|
|
By:
my cash is on the bungals..reasoning?..i am a jammy sod and i like the orange and black sripes.
|
|
By:
I like cincy on the ML, but because I figured out a long time ago that because this is a trading site, it's best, for me anyway, to try and be neutral and bet in play. Get in, get your profit, get out. Playing the point spread is a mugs game. The fact I like Cincy doesn't mean I'm betting them. That would be gambling.
|
|
By:
trading is gambling ffs
|
|
By:
Liking orange and black stripes is just as strong as Clay's reasoning.
|
|
By:
If you say so King
|
|
By:
explain how its not then...
|
|
By:
i ageee with king
|
|
By:
Its not because there are many spots in an NFL game when the odds will drop or rise, without fail. Get on the right side, trade in and out. You're hardly gambling. If you want to be technical and say that sometimes these times turn out wrong, therefor it's gambling, go ahead. I don't agree. Taking a position before the kickoff is gambling. Muffed kick, after that fumble. That's gambling. I bet when I know that I have a way above average chance to win, usually taking prices that are grossly wrong. Trade in, take a couple of percentage points, get out.
|
|
By:
many many times during an NFL game you have a chance for a winning trade, not just a couple of points, but several. No, I'll not say what they are.
|
|
By:
so you come here, slated the original poster and then went on to make the stupidest comment on betfair..
|
|
By:
Says who ? You. Fukc me, I think I'll go to my bedroom and cry
|
|
By:
sorry, your the bollox..
|
|
By:
I slated Clay, which I guess in your mind is terrible. But then you slate me. Go figure. Me bad, you good.
|
|
By:
Aren't you the guy who hates Novak Dj. Yeah, you're credible.
|
|
By:
What a load of rubbish. If you bet a team on the money line and they are never in front your can`t trade out for profit. Money Line and Trading is gambling just the same, albeit for windy punters, and I`m being polite.
I don`t know a serious NFL punter who doesn`t do their own handicaps and bet accordingly when one thinks the line is wrong. |
|
By:
Fundamental differences between trading and straight betting on an outcome, to make them very different activities indeed.
I would join this discussion but I'm busy trading at the moment, needs my full concentration at the moment...if I was gambling straight on the outcome I would / could discuss it . The difference between my p/l for the NFL season and Clays is another . (Apologies Clay, couldn't resist, you're a big boy I know you can take it ) |
|
By:
He`s betting Cincy now and if they score next he`ll lay off for a $1 profit and come on hear to tell us how clever he is
![]() |
|
By:
*here
|
|
By:
Hope Bungals don`t score a point.
![]() |
|
By:
....are you talking to me? or someone else?
|
|
By:
there ****...
|
|
By:
someone else
![]() |
|
By:
Quick trade out for a loss
![]() |
|
By:
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
It`s not gambling by the way
![]() |
|
By:
So anybody that bet the Bungals -2 on the handicap is a mug gambler but anybody who bet them in running on the money line, at a "value" price, when 3 or 10 points down early on (with aim of trading out for a profit at a shorter price, which they never went) are shrooooood investors and not gamblers.
![]() |
|
By:
nope
|