|
By:
i take the title of hugest muggg today imo with pitt and no about to lose. that beats your mugness by a distance
|
|
By:
oh dear, stringy. you clearly haven't got a clue :^0
|
|
By:
Need NE to get something late for me
|
|
By:
If you think I'll buzz off that your wrong. The name of the game is to take moolah off other people. That's where the buzz is and good odds is the first step. The odds on here often stink and I point that out. If that makes me sanctimonious then so be it.
|
|
By:
Darn them pesky Broncos....
|
|
By:
not only sanctimonious but also sticking your odious little nose on a fred where no one could give a flying fck about backing a 2.1 shot at 2.08. don't you get it? no one on this fred gives a fck.
|
|
By:
good value losers 06 Dec 21:18
not only sanctimonious but also sticking your odious little nose on a fred where no one could give a flying fck about backing a 2.1 shot at 2.08. don't you get it? no one on this fred gives a fck. Oh no. When you open your gob it all goes wrong doesn't it? Your thread was open to all you ming. Just cos a view came in that made you feel small, you say I'm sticking my nose in?? I bet your lonely. |
|
By:
put two bets on trebles on the spreads with borals wrote treble on one slip and nothing on the other just put win instead of win treble. will they settle it as a treble?
|
|
By:
Defo settled as a treble.
|
|
By:
thanks for help.
|
|
By:
stringy 06 Dec 21:36
Your thread was open to all you ming. theoretically yes, but anyone with a smidgeon of civility and good manners might assume that a fred called "muggg accas" was for people to post muggg accas on them and have a laugh as they either came in or went bust, not for some prck to start gobbing off and**ging off the people on the fred. I bet your lonely. it's "you're" btw hth |
|
By:
I made a point or two, you did the**ging. Now your reduced to having a go at my spelling! Your a top fella you are.
|
|
By:
He doesn't get it gvl. Let him rant and rage against all who dare to have a bit of fun. See you next week, I'll be back with another incredibly muggish acca. Hope stringy comes along too! It's good fun to see the state he gets himself into.
|
|
By:
stringy 06 Dec 21:57
I made a point or two, you did the**ging. Now your reduced to having a go at my spelling! Your a top fella you are. it's not spelling, it's punctuation, and you got it wrong twice again. you're right, kingmambo. think he might be just a troll, actually |
|
By:
What price have the Seahawks been matched at now and what's the score? Not bothered about punctuation, I prefer staying with the point. A point you've both lost. King dumbo is fuming.
|
|
By:
Mate, give it up. You've been made to look an utter tool on this thread. Go and have a hand shandy about your Seattle bet and we'll see you next week where you can have another go at telling us how stupid we are.
|
|
By:
Er yeah, your a good lad you are. Going off on one and worse still, cannot admit you're wrong. I hope good value plonk bag likes my spelling of you're. No doubt he'll find something else to blather about though.
|
|
By:
well according to the graph seattle got matched all the way out to 3, which is a lot higher than 2.1, so you didn't really get best value there, did you? never mind, none of us are perfect.
|
|
By:
Good God man, you really are pretty thick? I'm not sure what there's to admit being wrong about. The thread is called "mugggg accas", can you read you dribbling simpleton? Now, I really am off and you can happily have the last word. See you next week, I think I'm starting to fall for you :x
|
|
By:
pmsl
|
|
By:
good value losers 06 Dec 22:12 well according to the graph seattle got matched all the way out to 3, which is a lot higher than 2.1, so you didn't really get best value there, did you? never mind, none of us are perfect. Got 2.14 and went in again for 2.56 but it's in the balance so we'll see. |
|
By:
i don't care. goodbye.
|
|
By:
That's the spirit! You care about my punctuation though and that's nice. ;-)
|