North American
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
06 Dec 09
16:57
Joined:
Date Joined:
14 Sep 02
5 Selections Chosen
1 Detroit @ Cincinnati (Backing Cincinnati Bengals @ 1.12)
2 Oakland @ Pittsburgh (Backing Pittsburgh Steelers @ 1.06)
3 San Diego @ Cleveland (Backing San Diego Chargers @ 1.11)
4 New Orleans @ Washington (Backing New Orleans Saints @ 1.22)
5 Denver @ Kansas City (Backing Denver Broncos @ 1.38)
5-Folds
Selections Odds Stake Potential win
1,2,3,4 and 5 2.28 £100.00 £128.00
:^0 i can see those "value" merchants out there cringing
1 Detroit @ Cincinnati (Backing Cincinnati Bengals @ 1.12)
2 Oakland @ Pittsburgh (Backing Pittsburgh Steelers @ 1.06)
3 San Diego @ Cleveland (Backing San Diego Chargers @ 1.11)
4 New Orleans @ Washington (Backing New Orleans Saints @ 1.22)
5 Denver @ Kansas City (Backing Denver Broncos @ 1.38)
5-Folds
Selections Odds Stake Potential win
1,2,3,4 and 5 2.28 £100.00 £128.00
:^0 i can see those "value" merchants out there cringing
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 62
|
By:
denver lets u down.
|
|
By:
did i ask for any opinions? only other muggg acca posters are allowed to pass comment
|
|
By:
Jacksonville S/U
New England -4.5 Seattle S/U @13/2 Gl all! |
|
By:
gvl
you are going to have to change your username |
|
By:
lol
ok done pats =-4.5 oak +15.5 cards +3.5 unders tampa panthers unders titans All opionions welcome. |
|
By:
hahaha fair do's
|
|
By:
Bengals
Steelers Patriots Broncos @ $2.73 |
|
By:
New England @ Miami
Miami Dolphins Back 2.75 Denver @ Kansas City Kansas City Chiefs Back 3.25 San Francisco @ Seattle Seattle Seahawks Back 1.99 Minnesota @ Arizona Arizona Cardinals Back 2.62 Combined odds off around 46.0 for a score, proper mugg Acc that! |
|
By:
That's the spirit Furelli!
|
|
By:
cin and no struggling LOL was a bit worried about an no letdown after their big win over ne but i thought nah these guys are all top competitive sportsmen :0
|
|
By:
1 Detroit @ Cincinnati (Backing Cincinnati Bengals @ 1.12) 17-7 :)
2 Oakland @ Pittsburgh (Backing Pittsburgh Steelers @ 1.06) 10-6 :| 4 New Orleans @ Washington (Backing New Orleans Saints @ 1.22) 10-17 :0 5 Denver @ Kansas City (Backing Denver Broncos @ 1.38) 14-6 :| |
|
By:
Good Value backing Pittsburgh at 1.06?? Furelli backin' Seattle at 1.99?? Do you two not look at what the bookies are offering? They're commission free you know! Accas are for mugs and chasing cack prices just cos they're on here is for mugs too. get the right price or just plain sit it out. You've all been through too much pain to even think about arguing with me!! Bookie prices can be checked in one fell swoop on either Best betting or Odds checker. No need to thank me.
Oh, Seattle at 2.1 with Boils is the way to go for me! |
|
By:
oh do fck off you sanctimonious prck
|
|
By:
gv, agreed.
stringy, please read the thread title. Some of us do not take this too seriously and enjoy a flutter well aware that it might be considered mug punting. Chill out and concentrate on your own bets you fkin twink. |
|
By:
no level the game :D
|
|
By:
Two losing gob shytes who enjoy the sound of their own voices me thinks. Stretch your intelligence, then stretch your betting capabilities you pair of class 1, oven ready kn0b jobs.
|
|
By:
You appear to be absolutely seething stringy about bets that have nothing to do with you. LMAO at you, cretin.
|
|
By:
:) dont touch the games until i/r personally, plenny of oppos then.
As for the title well... does what it says on the tin for me |
|
By:
Keep laughing til you look at your balance you plonker. You got in on an argument that had nowt to do with you. The main point of which is seeking value. You appear to be condoning backing any sh it price. Are you a layer by chance Kingmambo? If not, don't give up your day job.
|
|
By:
stringy 06 Dec 20:14
Two losing gob shytes who enjoy the sound of their own voices me thinks. I particularly enjoyed this piece of unremitting rage, from a chump who has started a thread harking about his own views on the SF/SEA game. What a tool. |
|
By:
oh what an idiot you are, stringy. these are accas so what's the point of saying that better odds can be found on each match on oddschecker? you can't just cherry pick the best odds on each match from various firms and place them in an acca you thick fck.
btw congrats on nicking 2.1 on sea when they were only 2.08 on here. that will net you an extra 2p on £2. well done. |
|
By:
oh 4p actually! my bad
|
|
By:
He is fuming gvl at our mugness. What a situation, that on a Sunday evening with great football to watch, all he can think of is giving advice here. Perhaps he should fk off?
|
|
By:
omg oak take the lead! that's 2 in my muggg acca in trouble :^0
|
|
By:
Commission?? that means something to proper backers you pleb. Kingmambo's too busy tryin' to wind me up with this "seething" shyte to realise he's a bona fide loser.
|
|
By:
Kingmambo 06 Dec 20:22 stringy 06 Dec 20:14 Two losing gob shytes who enjoy the sound of their own voices me thinks. I particularly enjoyed this piece of unremitting rage, from a chump who has started a thread harking about his own views on the SF/SEA game. What a tool. I don't like to see people gettin ripped off by Betfair layers. are you a layer king dumbo?? |
|
By:
I don't need to wind you up fool, you've made a grade A t1t of yourself on your own.
|
|
By:
Take your concern elsewhere (bless), it's not wanted here. Hope this helps.
|
|
By:
Are you a layer was the question. Do you need help with this one?
|
|
By:
I don't understand why you are so obsessed with what I do or don't do.
I've posted my mug treble. I've backed the Jags in a single and laid that off at 17-0 if you must know (check the thread if you have to). Why are you so concerned with what others do? |
|
By:
Because your keen to back shyte odds it seems. That's why you've jumped in here with your big flap trap, small willy syndrome. So to spell it out to you (and believe me you don't deserve it), if your backing shyte odds, your a muggg punter. Got it yet? That's it, look at your balance and slowly realise.
Fook wit. |
|
By:
Haha :) You ARE seething!
|
|
By:
Yes I'm seething. I don't know how I manage sometimes.
|
|
By:
what a fcking dipstick you are, gleefully pointing out we're muggg punters. did you not read the title of the fred, you thick fck? now just p1ss off and leave us mugs to enjoy our mugness.
|
|
By:
Your concern for me, my bets and my balance is sweet stringy :x Rest assured I don't give a sh1t about you.
|
|
By:
Good luck boys. You know the score. Nearly game time now so this lesson is done. CLASS DISMISSED!!
|
|
By:
good value losers 06 Dec 20:23
oh what an idiot you are, stringy. these are accas so what's the point of saying that better odds can be found on each match on oddschecker? you can't just cherry pick the best odds on each match from various firms and place them in an acca you thick fck. you never did answer this teeny little point did you? cretin |
|
By:
Well, looks like the Pats have let my treble down and I am an utter mug.
I am almost destitute but I am thankful for stringy and his concern. I'll have to scrape around to find the pennies to do my mug acca next week. Perhaps stringy will lend me a few quid? :x |
|
By:
Oh dear. First point was accas for idiots. Second point was toward prices per game. Going now so good luck. Even the obtuse deserve a little luck.
|