|
By:
bookmakers queuing up outside no 10 to volunteer for a tax increase
wonder what % of £ in a FOBT or a PUB TILL is BENEFIT £ ? |
|
By:
No booze, no cash payments. Lovely lot the Tories.
|
|
By:
i thought the tories were all about freedom of choice......bloody socialists telling folk what to do.
|
|
By:
I wonder if you can buy a ticket for the Accrington Stanley match
|
|
By:
now the loony ighnorant of racing/punting kemi has stepped down the bookmaking rabbit hole,you just no she,ll now be lobbied by those in horse racing, some bookies before the next GE and this policy will be refined so benefit £ will not allowed to be used on FOBT,/caino games but ok to be used for horses racing/sorts betting,the same FOBT,s that todays she,s camaigning not to be taxed more
|
|
By:
Grenade1972 Joined: 02 Apr 25
Replies: 28124 Sep 26 09:11 No booze, no cash payments. Lovely lot the Tories this is the twerp that started a thread celebrating the sudden and early death of someone and called him a c not quite so lovely himself |
|
By:
Middle aged adults loitering outside off-licenses waiting to ask teenagers to buy booze for them.
The times they are a-changin' |
|
By:
pandora will be raging
|
|
By:
Gimmick, get the sentiment, however as already said and on various networks, they will get friends to buy it.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Pop down the unlicensed bookies bet yer benefits
card on fav at newmarket Win 2 benefits cards, KERCHING... |
|
By:
Won't work as pointed out by others but lets be clear. It is not their money. It is the taxpayers who supply the cash for benefits.
|
|
By:
It's the government and the public that provide the infrastructure to taxpayers to make money.
|
|
By:
Just like how Betfair works
|
|
By:
if as the argument goes the state pension is your right because youve paid for it with ni contributions
how many yrs of job seekers allowance have you earned with 30 yrs of tax for example ? and this is the really laughable bit,tory minister is possibly very shortly going to face jail,becasuse he was found guilty of taking his taxpayer funded wage and using it to bet on date of GE using inside info given to him by the taxpayer paid uk PM ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Why pick 30 years? Why not five, or never worked at all?
|
|
By:
^^^
agree to an extent. When I was young it was a stigma relying on benefits. Nowadays, and been like it for a while, it's a lifestyle with the challenge of how much can you rinse out of the taxpayer. Take daytime television off the air. Might encourage the layabouts to look for work (work being something that can occupy their lives instead of being a couch potato getting obese and diabetic, alongside developing 'mental illness' brought on by living a life of a benefit ponce and layabout. |
|
By:
YouTube has significantly more viewers in the UK than traditional daytime TV.
It won't be long before the TV licence fee is replaced by an internet tax. |
|
By:
Thank god I can still spend my pip on my smack and crack without the tories stepping in.
|
|
By:
and even my pension (which I have of course paid for).
|
|
By:
...."but lets be clear. It is not their money" As soon as the benefit is legally in your bank account it is YOUR money. Think you will pay less tax if there's no unemployed ?
|
|
By:
That the point isn't it. The government takes money off of one person and hands it to another. Under the theory that the recipient needs it to survive [not for gambling or weed]
The Labour government is borrowing £billions per MONTH. Half of that is just to service its existing debt pile ![]() |
|
By:
UK Government borrowing rose in August to the second-highest level for the month on record, coming in above forecasts and piling pressure on Chancellor John Healey ahead of his first autumn Budget, figures show.
Public sector net borrowing rose to £18.3 billion in August, which was £3.5 billion more than what official Government forecasters had been expecting, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said. |
|
By:
I'd estimate 10% of this forum have a good grasp of what goes on in regard to fiscal policy, borrowing, benefits policy et al.
You can half that for the general public, aside from how to maximise their own benefit claims. The amount of people that believe there actually is a magic money tree, 50%+ |
|
By:
healey will follow his namesake to the imf when we crash n burnham because the bugtank backbenchers wont have any reduction of the barmy benefits bill
cancel hs2. its a white elephant already the bbc licence fee is an anachronism and it should be funded by subscription to whatever decent progs it still makes, if there are any |
|
By:
"I'd estimate 10% of this forum have a good grasp of what goes on in regard to fiscal policy, borrowing, benefits policy et al....You can half that for the general public
You really think the % of bright people on the forum is twice that of the general public. ![]() |
|
By:
In regards to those topics. Gambling on horse racing is tilted to being somewhat numerate.
|
|
By:
but not literate
its halve |
|
By:
The level of general financial know-how is genuinely shocking. At least in my experience. I work in accounting and so many of my colleagues are unaware of basics such as pensions and savings accounts.
You only need to watch one of those Martin Lewis shows. The government had to ruin the domestic energy market, as searching and switching to lower costs suppliers was beyond much of the general public. |
|
By:
its halve
The pedants inevitably do it to themselves ![]() |
|
By:
6.7 million adults not in work
if all 6.7 million decided they wanterd to start work on mon,you,d have to beg 6 million of them to stay out of the workplace as currently theres only 750,000 job vaccancies,and they,ll include 10,s of 1000,s in the public sector paid for by the taxpayer the maffs aint maffing |
|
By:
thats hardly pedantic. it was pertinent and mildly amusing
martin lewis makes more of a programme than a show, which is light-hearted amusing or drama |
|
By:
Pretty amusing that you posted five words about literacy, and one of them demonstrated your lack of it
![]() |
|
By:
|
|
By:
it did not
stop wriggling |
|
By:
Quite extraordinary numbers I think you'll agree, 1st timer. Not in a good way.
|
|
By:
The number one rule, if you're going to randomly snipe about someone's grammar, is to get it right yourself, when sniping. Otherwise, it's fairly embarrassing. Or should that be, its ;)
|
|
By:
it is not any rule and your use of comas is a grammatical solecism
its not embarrassing in the least. ewe fink im unawear? i disdain literary convention when engaging in frivolous epistolary activity on a platform where the majority are partially or wholly unawhere of all but the most egregious errors also, i cant be @rsed, its so trivial |