There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 154 comments are related to the topic:
non runner
non runner
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 154
|
By:
Go and blow a few bubbles you sad tedious bore bubbleiron. Do you EVER tire of going around in circles on here. Some stamina. I'll be going around a nice few shops to "collect". Its like backing a winner
 . |
|
By:
he's saying the start was affected
yes the horse affected his start |
|
By:
wouldn't have been a noner if he was going to be held up
 |
|
By:
|
|
By:
tactics are irrelevant
|
|
By:
So why would a horse put its leg up like that? Some horses start slowly, soem jocks caught asleep, some facing the wrong way in non stall starts - so whats the difference? Hard to comprehend the rationale for this unless someone knowldegeable explains - no-one has yet!
|
|
By:
afaik it is meant to cover a scenario where the officials have made an error, or equipment etc. not a horse impacting his own chance.
|
|
By:
Not really a rule that anyone was crying out for, open to wide interpretation and just seems wrong
|
|
By:
Unbelieveable bullshatt from the fat moron.
The horse caused its own problems and was denied nothing |
|
By:
Total ollox
|
|
By:
the rule applied correctly is sensible. it hinging on the aftertimed intended tactics is abso ridiculous
|
|
By:
As you don't bet bubbles it shouldn't concern you. Go and pour yourself a sherry and calm down.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
even they mentioned in the explanation that it was the fav. also, completely irrelevant.
|
|
By:
Hell yeah he did non runner ??
|
|
By:
lots of irrelevant bs in the "explanation" of why it was voided
|
|
By:
Go away Dickster you fantasist bullshatter
|
|
By:
Christmas day for favourite backers. Unbelievable stupidity from the Stewards.
The horse lost because he couldn't handle the ground. |
|
By:
Did you want to be up front early, jockey? No guv, I was going to hold it up, so no bother
|
|
By:
The horse lost because he couldn't handle the ground.
that's the main reason clearly start didn't help |
|
By:
I believe that fat moron did me up at Aintree when Pied Piper dead heated and both jockeys agreed made no difference.
South African cretin |
|
By:
You would be delighted if you backed the winner,wouldn't you
 |
|
By:
Did a horse not face the wrong way when the stall opened? It was deemed a runner.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
gone off 4.79
|
|
By:
The horse caused itself the problem.
Simple as that |
|
By:
|
|
By:
I was being ironic
|
|
By:
ok alanis
|
|
By:
O'Brien stated that its horse racing regarding the start
|
|
By:
Just seen this. No financial interest myself.
Decision was an absolute steaming pile of shìt. |
|
By:
Non wiser if wasn’t camera in stalls
How many times that scenario was probably happened? |
|
By:
By even stating that the horse was favourite showed the bloated warthog doesn't even understand his own rules as it had F/A to do with the decision
|
|
By:
Just when you think racing couldn't make itself even less appealing as a betting sport....it outdoes itself on the biggest race it has.
You can bet 1.001 if you back a horse that does similar you won't be seeing a penny back... |
|
By:
Exactly,Stu
|
|
By:
are inrunning lays voided ?
|
|
By:
There are a few times you can really start to believe this sport deserves to die off, this is one of them...
|
|
By:
What would have happened if it had won ?
|
|
By:
My account went negative even though I did not lay Ben. The highly intelligent jobsworth at Betfair thought it was the correct decision. So rescinded their inept decision.
|
|
By:
I can only think that they're trying to put a positive spin on what has been an awful 'festival', and by a positive spin I mean they dont want to see a negative headline regarding the Derby favourite losing its chance at the start and think theyre somehowappeasing the betting public. Seeing people leave in their droves before the Derby said it all. Nonsense decision.
|