Evan Williams Guilty

odds on a bit porridge for evan...

In 2001 the foot and mouth outbreak put his farm out of business..
Quarter of a century later he has put his foot in his mouth.

taking it to trial has prob secured a jail sentence.

Just about the only time you'd want to be a Labour MP.

The point raised by madtolo on the other fred, in the event of him being found guilty, can he be considered a fit and proper person to hold a licence?

Even if he's found not to be, just put the licence in his wife's name and carry on as you were?

The court heard Mr Dandridge was staying at a holiday cottage near to Williams’ racehorse training centre.
Mr Dandridge took his cockerpoo Gulliver for a walk in a paddock that was part of the stables, and because it was dark was using a torch.
There had been incidents of fly-grazing on Williams’ property in the past – where animals are left on land without permission – as well as hare coursing and poaching, the court heard.
His family spotted the lights on their land and believed Mr Dandridge was lamping, when people use bright lights to find animals such as rabbits and foxes, often with a dog.
Williams told the court he did not injure Mr Dandridge and maintained he was hurt after being pulled over on the rough terrain by his out-of-control dog and had fallen into a drainage hole.
“If we hadn’t acted in the way we had, Mr Dandridge could have been on his own, hit his head, and we could be looking at serious, serious, serious death,” the father-of-three said.
William Bebb, prosecuting, asked the defendant if he was the hero, and he replied: “I’m no hero.
“I’m only saying that Mr Dandridge’s unfortunate lack of control of his dog caused his injury.”
Mr Bebb suggested Williams’ account of an out-of-control dog was “nonsense”.
“You were filled with rage due to the nature of the background you had with lampers,” he said.
“Whether a broken bone or a wound, you wanted to teach those lampers a lesson. I suggest you struck him repeatedly, swearing and shouting as you did.”

   Trying to say the old boy walking his dog was mistaken for poachers. Previous good character might save him from getting locked up, who knows with the courts these days.

Nearly as pathetic as the excuses when one of his gets ridden tailed off....

I believe that is correct, must have been the similar lilt

Nasty. I await the sentence - custodial (suspended) or a mega fine. More importantly I wonder what the rudderless / stumbler BHA will do.

7/4 plse

Was the guy who was attacked staying in a property owned by Williams on his land??

The Labour MP had no mitigation, lied through his teeth, and the assault was witnessed, and caught on film. Also held a job in public office, where (theoretically) they are meant to be showing a good example.

He looks nasty imo.

Only the other day I caught someone with a dog letting them go to the toilet on my land. Unknown to them, they were on my cctv watching their dog doing it. The level of gall was stratospheric, then trying to claim they couldn't stop the dog. I wasn't considering assaulting them obviously, but I could see how it could get heated as instead of being apologetic and saying it won't happen again, they were acting as if I was in the wrong for pulling them up on it!

It's a bizarre culture shift in society now where people will just lie to your face, as if you are some kind of idiot. As if some people have actually bought into this left wing nonsense concept of your truth (ie fiction) rather than the actual truth. You walk your little dog near to my land with the lead extended, and then claim you are helpless to stop it when you are literally watching it run on to my land and lift its leg. lol.

"The spread of misinformation has emerged as a global concern. Academic attention has recently shifted to emphasize the role of political elites as drivers of misinformation. Yet, little is known of the relationship between party politics and the spread of misinformation—in part due to a dearth of cross-national empirical data needed for comparative study. This article examines which parties are more likely to spread misinformation, by drawing on a comprehensive database of 32M tweets from parliamentarians in 26 countries, spanning 6 years and several election periods. The dataset is combined with external databases such as Parlgov and V-Dem, linking the spread of misinformation to detailed information about political parties and cabinets, thus enabling a comparative politics approach to misinformation. Using multilevel analysis with random country intercepts, we find that radical-right populism is the strongest determinant for the propensity to spread misinformation. Populism, left-wing populism, and right-wing politics are not linked to the spread of misinformation. These results suggest that political misinformation should be understood as part and parcel of the current wave of radical right populism, and its opposition to liberal democratic institution."

Populism, left-wing populism, and right-wing politics are not linked to the spread of misinformation. These results suggest that political misinformation should be understood as part and parcel of the current wave of radical right populism, and its opposition to liberal democratic institution.

lol stands to reason obviously that a summary of investigating so called misinformation, is indeed, itself, lying

High percentage of farmers are cruel cold individuals,don’t believe what you,animal cruelty goes on big time…

One barbarian (imo) shot dead a spaniel puppy 60 months old in front of the little girl age 9 and her mum….

Dreadful scenes because it was barking in a field…..

Another couple asked the barbarian if it had seen a young dog….the barbarian replied it’s in my trailer shot to bits….

Reptile of the highest…

ok trannies in the thread another 1.01 landed