|
By:
Git up
|
|
By:
ItsMeSwaddle22 Jan 26 14:23Joined: 19 Oct 15 | Topic/replies: 13,019 | Blogger: ItsMeSwaddle's blog
Jan 22, 2026 -- 2:06PM, ItsMeSwaddle wrote:Not to see, had to go round the last, not Eric's fault is it Yep well done, summary spot on. Good riding too forgot to mention that earlier. "good riding" = Macey suspended for 2 days for careless riding. |
|
By:
Here is the full report...............
An enquiry was held to consider the placings in this race after interference on the run to the line involving the winner, ERIC CARMEN (IRE), ridden by Benjamin Macey and IONITY (FR), placed third, ridden by Isabel Williams. Being a 7lb claiming conditional, Macey was accompanied in the enquiry by a senior rider. The Stewards considered that the interference had not improved ERIC CARMEN (IRE)’s placing as although IONITY (FR) was carried off its intended line and became briefly crowded for room ERIC CARMEN (IRE) always looked to be holding the third past the post and appeared to be extending the margin between them going through the line. Macey was suspended for 2 days for careless riding as he allowed his mount to drift right-handed without sufficient correction taking Williams off her intended line......Isabel Williams reported that IONITY (FR), placed third, suffered interference. |
|
By:
Jan 22, 2026 -- 2:06PM, ItsMeSwaddle wrote:
Not to see, had to go round the last, not Eric's fault is it it still drifted 15yds right after they bypassed the last hurdle though. ![]() |
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
He is palpably steering the horse there. It was not careless, he did not allow the horse to drift, it went where he was asking it to. you don't need to be an experienced horseman to know that pulling hard on the right reign is telling the horse to go right
![]() |
|
By:
Rein
![]() |
|
By:
Let it go for God's sake.
The result rightly stood (Praise The Lord) ![]() |
|
By:
I backed the winner in the enq.
It's just absurd, if you see the head on reply, he looks up, sees she's there and immediately hangers right. Ludicrous to pretend it was accidental. |
|
By:
So did I but accidental or not the correct decision
|
|
By:
He can be disqualified for dangerous riding.
|
|
By:
I know the rules,Cider.
It was careless only |
|
By:
You're claiming it was the correct decision.
Do you view the head on and conclude the horse went to the rail because the jockey didn't do enough to stop it. Or, he wanted it to go there? |
|
By:
In What world ?
Winner gets Slung , Objection by COS to the 2nd , What price to both happen in same race ![]() |
|
By:
|
|
By:
A two day ban for careless riding was correct
|
|
By:
from 2:04:25 on RTV clock there's some intent to come across to the rail imo
|
|
By:
he's hard on the rail before the omitted final flight it was clearly (correctly) the place he wanted to be & he hasn't done enough to keep his horse straight or realised early enough where she is
|
|
By:
If you deliberately risk bringing a horse down (opponent) to gain an advantage, I think it is dangerous. My view is that he bullied her out of it, and may well not have done that to a senior jockey.
My general point is that it should not be passed off as 'accidental' when it was evidently a deliberate manoeuvre. |
|
By:
Cider • January 22, 2026 6:18 PM GMT
I backed the winner in the enq. Why ![]() |
|
By:
BHA definitions...
1) A rider is guilty of careless riding if he fails to take reasonable steps to avoid causing interference or causes interference by inattention or misjudgement. 2) A rider is guilty of improper riding if he causes interference by some manoeuvre where he knew or ought reasonably to have known that interference would be the result, or any other form of misconduct (whether mounted or dismounted) in the course of riding. 3) A rider is guilty of dangerous riding if he causes serious interference by: Purposely interfering with another horse or rider, or; Riding in a way that is far below that of a competent and careful rider and where it would be obvious to such a competent or careful rider that riding in that way was likely to endanger the safety of a horse and rider this is why its improper riding because he's aiming to come back to the rail & has misjudged where she is |
|
By:
there's no way he would have gone back to the rail if clear, just for the final run between the last flight and the line. to me it is clear that he initially is going to stay straight (after passing the last) until he sees her.
|
|
By:
oisin @ sandown was 3
newton abbot 2-3 years ago can't remember jockeys was 3 also neither called |
|
By:
I have concluded that you could start an argument in an empty room,Cider.
|
|
By:
A rider is guilty of dangerous riding if he causes serious interference by: purposely interfering with another horse or rider
I feel it's fair to say whether it is 2 or 3 is judgement, but it is one of them. |
|
By:
Yet you backed it to keep the race
![]() |
|
By:
you are arguing with me, irons. Again
![]() |
|
By:
he isn't staying straight immediately after bypassing the hurdle
only forest blaze runs straight to the line |
|
By:
Correct,Cider
![]() |
|
By:
horse hanging right on the run in & he wants the rail its nothing to do with trying to put her through the rail
|
|
By:
I don't like lies. Trying to pass that off as accidental is lying.
|
|
By:
if you remember sandown 1 he has deliberately steered to put him through the rail when his horse hangs off it 1 lane
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
afaik nobody is stating he tried to put her through the rail. it can be seen on the head on replay, he looks up, sees she's coming and cuts her up deliberately.
it was not accidental, it was not the horse drifting of its own accord. |
|
By:
nobody is stating he tried to put her through the rail.
to be deemed dangerous it needs to meet this criteria level |
|
By:
A rider is guilty of dangerous riding if he causes serious interference by: purposely interfering with another horse or rider
|
|
By:
I'm not stating it has to be 3. but it was 2 or 3, not 1.
|
|
By:
which he hasn't
|
|
By:
agree with you its more than accidental
|
|
By:
Give it up,wonders.
Jesus could appear to Cider who would immediately argue ![]() |