Morning All, could well be the best horse in the race and they think a lot of it, as do Becketts with theirs. I think charltons have a bug in the yard. Only my opinion of course, and it won't affect all their runners , but just being a friendly forumite. And no, im not laying it, as it is quite possibly the best horse in the race , but the yard does appear to have a bit of a bug.
On the plus side this c and d charlton has an awesome record of 4 from 6 . However as nearly all his runners over the last fortnight have fallen out the back of the television you'd need your head read to be backing any of his . 1-0-15 winners to runners . 0.5 a/e
The power of the forum ? Probably not, but since posting Quadrillion has suddenly lost a leg and started a huge drift from 1.7 to 2.3 And Becketts has shortened from 6 to 4.5. At this rate we will have flip flopping favourites , though there is a long way to go yet.
The power of the forum ? Probably not, but since posting Quadrillion has suddenly lost a leg and started a huge drift from 1.7 to 2.3 And Becketts has shortened from 6 to 4.5. At this rate we will have flip flopping favourites , though there is a lon
Interesting race,betting support indicate a win for Quadrillion,not withstanding that Swiped trainer Beckett good record at track and the outsider Kalokalo,dwelt on only outing could surprise.
Interesting race,betting support indicate a win for Quadrillion,not withstanding that Swiped trainer Beckett good record at track and the outsider Kalokalo,dwelt on only outing could surprise.
Aside from the Easterby horse that's had 4 runs the others have had 3 runs between the five with two debutantes so with 2yo babies it's as good a guessing race as possible , without hindsight you couldn't lay one of them with any confidence or guesswork so if forced to guess may as well guess big.
Good luck those brave enough
Aside from the Easterby horse that's had 4 runs the others have had 3 runs between the five with two debutantes so with 2yo babies it's as good a guessing race as possible , without hindsight you couldn't lay one of them with any confidence or guessw
won 5 lengths hard on the snaff and nobody at Burkes had a scooby judging by the market100/30 to 14/1 (Morning price: 10/3 7/2 10/3 7/2 10/3 7/2 4/1 9/2 5/1 9/2 4/1 5/1 9/2 5/1 11/2 6/1 15/2)(Ring price: 8/1 17/2 9/1 10/1 11/1 12/1 14/1) SP 14/1so wh
Akajack re your comment saying the sample size is too small "yes 1 winner from 15 but 8 of those were between 14/1 and 50/1; very small sample size "
However the other runners were fancied : evens , 11-8, 5-2, 4-1, 5-1, and now a 4-7 shot btn. Admittedly it didnt fall out the back of the tv but it still must have been disappointing to those who backed it. And that equals expected 2.5 and a/e 0.3
I would think that's perfectly ok as a sample size for something as transient as trainer form over 14 days, wouldn't you ?
Akajack re your comment saying the sample size is too small "yes 1 winner from 15 but 8 of those were between 14/1 and 50/1; very small sample size "However the other runners were fancied : evens , 11-8, 5-2, 4-1, 5-1, and now a 4-7 shot btn. Admitte
However the other runners were fancied : evens , 11-8, 5-2, 4-1, 5-1, and now a 4-7 shot btn. Admittedly it didnt fall out the back of the tv but it still must have been disappointing to those who backed it. And that equals expected 2.5 and a/e 0.3
I would think that's perfectly ok as a sample size for something as transient as trainer form over 14 days, wouldn't you ?
no, expected winners were under 2 so 1 winner and he's on the expected value. But I hope you profited by laying it Oneten
However the other runners were fancied : evens , 11-8, 5-2, 4-1, 5-1, and now a 4-7 shot btn. Admittedly it didnt fall out the back of the tv but it still must have been disappointing to those who backed it.And that equals expected 2.5 and a/e 0.3I