Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 513 comments are related to the topic:
Oisin !!!!!

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 5 of 13  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ... | 13 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 513
By:
duffy
When: 28 Jun 25 16:51
He's charged with being over the limit, I'm taking that as fact.
We know for a fact that he crashed the car into a tree.
We know for a fact that the passenger received serious injuries.
In all seriousness, we all understand about human frailty and we're none of us perfect, but you've got to draw the line somewhere before the worst happens.
By:
unitedbiscuits
When: 28 Jun 25 17:00
It's none of your business, duffy.
By:
LoyalHoncho
When: 28 Jun 25 17:02
Yes it is Duffy.
By:
uptheirons
When: 28 Jun 25 17:24
Sanctimonious whippet botherer
By:
Delashay
When: 28 Jun 25 18:00
Lots making excuses for him when none are needed.

Duffy you missed out the refusal of giving the sample.

Personally Mo Farah’s rep was tarnished by not giving two samples on arranged dates. After the Olympics everyone talked legacy.

His legacy is up in the air at the moment and he is in the shady dodge-pot category with Mo - to add to his list of ever growing bad judgments!
By:
ThePomp
When: 28 Jun 25 18:16
Dela, what excuses have been made for him?
By:
ThePomp
When: 28 Jun 25 18:17
Quote them or recite them verbatim giving forimites handle.
By:
N-east Correspondent
When: 28 Jun 25 18:18
agree that the courts should first decide on any punishment, then see where that takes him in racing terms

thought he was constantly being monitored for alcohol/drug testing as are all other jockeys
so it suggests he does have his drinking currently under some form of control or he would have been
caught somewhere done the line
By:
elise
When: 28 Jun 25 18:19
don't talk utter sense NE
By:
Delashay
When: 28 Jun 25 18:21
Plenty of you are saying it’s nothing that bad. Like it happens all the time. People have brought race riding into the topic when this isn’t about that.

How’s the fishing going? Missed your Ascot lays.

We all f up and sine of us get lucky to see the light and say no more.

From one human to another - I hope that he has that moment of clarity to think - shat what have I done or am I capable of?

If he feels no night sweats having done all that he’s attached to then he’s something else.
By:
uptheirons
When: 28 Jun 25 18:22
Judgementals rule on here elise
By:
elise
When: 28 Jun 25 18:24
can't say i recall anyone saying it's not that bad, the ones with sense are saying let the authorities deal with it in the correct order as they have the full facts
By:
Delashay
When: 28 Jun 25 18:26
Being multiple champion jockey isn’t much of a legacy  in the great scheme of things, if he doesn’t change his ways he has that to take with him!

And that old saying - I coulda …. Laugh
By:
unitedbiscuits
When: 28 Jun 25 18:37
Not sure why, after the law has run its course, Oisin Murphy then has to answer to the court of sour losers on the betfair forum.

Not part of the statute unless I'm missing something.
By:
Delashay
When: 28 Jun 25 18:44
If that’s aimed at me then you can’t read human to human. Sour? Well it’s a short word to spell! Laugh
By:
ThePomp
When: 28 Jun 25 18:45
You couldn't quote them because you can't Dela. Because they don't exist. Most if not all of your posts on this thread along with Duffy contain pure speculation and conjecture. I can only speak for myself but I am debating whether the BHA should have any jurisdiction or authority at all on whether Murphy can continue his job at this present moment and even after settlement. I think he should. The offense is a civil matter which is yet to be settled. Your posts are driven from an emotional view point rather than factual. Christ, it's like talking to the wife.
By:
duffy
When: 28 Jun 25 18:50
A civil matter?
By:
ThePomp
When: 28 Jun 25 18:56
Look it up duffy
By:
duffy
When: 28 Jun 25 19:07
You're obviously referring to something else, this is a criminal case.
By:
unitedbiscuits
When: 28 Jun 25 19:12
Indeed it is. So we abide with whatever the criminal court decides on Thursday.

Everybody is happy.
By:
ThePomp
When: 28 Jun 25 19:17
Civil in the sense that outside of his job Murphy is a civilian.
By:
ThePomp
When: 28 Jun 25 19:18
So no. Not referring to something else Duffy.
By:
duffy
When: 28 Jun 25 19:27
ThePomp 28 Jun 25 19:17 
Civil in the sense that outside of his job Murphy is a civilian.


Go on then, what does that even mean and what's your point?
By:
DrGordons
When: 28 Jun 25 19:32
There are two different but related issues. One is what happens in court and whatever happens the evidence is going to be unsavoury.
The other point is that a jockey needs a license to ride and if the BHA say Murphy has failed to address his problems and is therefore a danger to other riders then they won't licence him.
By:
ponchoslament
When: 28 Jun 25 19:36
You couldn't quote them because you can't Dela. Because they don't exist. Most if not all of your posts on this thread along with Duffy contain pure speculation and conjecture. I can only speak for myself but I am debating whether the BHA should have any jurisdiction or authority at all on whether Murphy can continue his job at this present moment and even after settlement. I think he should. The offense is a civil matter which is yet to be settled. Your posts are driven from an emotional view point rather than factual. Christ, it's like talking to the wife.
Rate reply:

Sirs been at the gin ??
By:
Hayden
When: 28 Jun 25 19:37
Didn't Cecil carry on training after committing a very similar misdemeanor , long time ago but don't think he was prevented from carrying out his duties.
By:
uptheirons
When: 28 Jun 25 19:37
Obsessive and judgemental would do for starters duffy
By:
ponchoslament
When: 28 Jun 25 19:39
Didn't Cecil carry on training after committing a very similar misdemeanor , long time ago but don't think he was prevented from carrying out his duties.

They took him to the cleaners, and other mr meaners
But he got right up between her rump and her ribena
By:
ThePomp
When: 28 Jun 25 19:41
Murphy turns up to work and midway through a race pushes a jockey off a horse like soinillon did to rossa Ryan was it? Then the BHA have every right to dole out punishment. The offense he committed was as a civilian not a jockey. BHA have no right to stop him earning a living regardless of outcome of criminal proceedings in the civilian world which is where the offense was committed.
By:
DrGordons
When: 28 Jun 25 19:44
If he was drunk then he was contravening the BHA stipulations after his 14 month ban. So the body that allows him to ride and grants him a license can do what they see fit.
By:
Delashay
When: 29 Jun 25 09:14
I simply  couldn’t be bothered as had already touched on them in a previous post if you’d of read without your biased  motherly over protection for a wrong ‘un.

Delashay • June 27, 2025 8:36 AM BST
That needing him will only add to his feeling of being bigger than he is and fuel the monster within him.

Celebrate the good kick out the bad. No one outside of racing has heard of Lambourn or cares for it.


…”some of the things he's purportedly done are nothing more than a quiet Monday for some people.”

That’s some statement!

Nothing is unfounded, she was in the car with someone over the limit. We all have a choice.

If you go out with someone who carries a knife you’re as bad as getting into a car with someone who is under the influence.

In no other sport do they tolerate such bad role models or turn a blind eye. He’s ripping it out of everyone who has given him a chance.

No other jock before him was held up and promoted like he was by Chapman, he was in a very privileged position and abused it.

Bad apples only rot.

You can’t get more factual than my original post.

Delashay • June 27, 2025 7:38 AM BST
The girl deserves no sympathy whatsoever. She had a choice to get in the car or not to. She made the wrong one and is as complicit as him for not telling him to hand over the keys.

He should be kicked out of racing full stop given his track record.

FACT : you don’t get into a car that’s to be driven on a public highway by someone who is intoxicated and out of the game!


It really doesn’t get more black and white than that!


You mistake empathy for emotion. Which was shown because he obviously has problems and is likely to be an over emotional bloke himself - hence his favourite singer is James Blunt!

Don’t he write love songs? Hardly Rock ‘N Roll is he!Laugh I’d of thought more for female fans! ;)
By:
uptheirons
When: 29 Jun 25 10:35
Judgemental bullshatter
By:
Delashay
When: 29 Jun 25 10:47
LoyalHoncho • June 27, 2025 1:22 PM BST
I think the most ridiculous comment I’ve read on here on the subject is,…..”he’s absolutely vital for racing”.   Laugh

Basically saying - let’s all turn a blind eye make excuses as it happened outside the track, because , “He’s vital!” Laugh
By:
Delashay
When: 29 Jun 25 10:49

Jun 28, 2025 -- 3:16PM, SlippyBlue wrote:


Alcoholism is an illness, he needs help and counselling and not hrown to the wolves.Having said that, I think a six month prison sentence suspended say for two years would be appropriate and a very stark deterrent for reoffending.


Here’s another FACT! But he can only get help if he sees that he has a problem first. Otherwise …

By:
BILLWHU
When: 29 Jun 25 10:58
This isn’t the same time is it when he missed a meeting after going to hospital with his farmers
By:
impossible123
When: 29 Jun 25 11:28
Personally I'd not have him in horseracing until he takes decisive actions to rid this ill of his. He must take time off the sport to attend Alcoholic Anonymous (AA), stay sober (riding or not) and alcohol free for at least 12 months. I do not think Mr Murphy can do both; he's failed twice in the past.

An alcoholic needs to be at rock-bottom 1st, fully understands and has the desire to rid the dependence on alcohol in their life. Until then the individual will never kick the dependence.

I firmly believe Mr Murphy will repeatedly infringe the drink-driving rules; repeatedly failed unannounced/unscheduled testing at racecourses; involve in disagreement with joe public because of his addiction.

Mr Murphy needs to help himself 1st; he's his worst enemy. He does not need self-pity or pity from any joe public.
By:
Delashay
When: 29 Jun 25 14:43
Couldn’t agree more Impossible, however all of what you’ve suggested is easier said than done.
By:
uptheirons
When: 29 Jun 25 15:29
"I firmly believe Mr Murphy will repeatedly infringe the drink-driving rules";wrote implausible.
Obviously no need for a trial thenSad
By:
ALIEN SEX FIEND
When: 29 Jun 25 16:37
So many valid points here. Overall If he he has done wrong the appropriate book needs throwing at him. As a Non drinker/Non smoker/Nil substance abuse all my health, had the odd bet now and again Laugh, I hope he has not
let himself down again.
Some people get off on hoping the worst for others, some just like to see fairness. I like the lad and worry like some of my favourite sports stars Best & Higgins he does not go the wrong way, the demon drink & drugs
has blighted many careers in sport and us mere mortals. When he is right in himself he is infectious with his knowledge of racing. So please if you want him done, do so for the right reasons and not petty hate.
If he is gone you will have to find your next victim for hate.
ps Well done Calandagan...... smooth.
By:
impossible123
When: 29 Jun 25 17:00
Will Calandagan do battle with Jan Brueghel again in the King George at Ascot on 26th July post today's victory? Let's hope so. It could be another ding-dong like previously where the latter prevailed by a smidgeon at Epsom.
Page 5 of 13  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ... | 13 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com