Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
leif
13 Feb 25 20:05
Joined:
Date Joined: 26 Jun 08
| Topic/replies: 14,696 | Blogger: leif's blog
...shake up betting on racing and combat dwindling interest.
Andrew Black, who shaped the digital betting landscape for the 21st century when founding the Betfair betting exchange in 2000, has revealed his latest idea to revolutionise betting on horseracing once again.

Writing exclusively in the Racing Post, Black advocates the scrapping of each-way betting and the introduction of a new ‘performance’ bet, where the better a horse does, the greater the return.

Black believes it could operate successfully in conjunction with an enhanced daily pool product built around a leaderboard, an idea he considers a potential improvement on the Placepot and Jackpot offerings at present.
https://www.racingpost.com/news/britain/betfair-founder-andrew-black-reveals-idea-to-shake-up-betting-on-racing-and-combat-dwindling-interest-aUW6Y3m0pTjb/

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 68
By:
leif
When: 13 Feb 25 20:06
Shocked

full article available to subscriners of the Rancid post
By:
formoftheace
When: 13 Feb 25 20:07
He should shut his trap he done enough damage to the punting game in my opinion….
By:
freddiewilliams
When: 13 Feb 25 20:16
Ffs and his usual p1sh
By:
DIE LINKE
When: 13 Feb 25 21:21
they already have that performance bet shyte and nee bugger bets on it.
By:
swiftynifty
When: 13 Feb 25 21:30
I've always advocated sliding scale on e/w returns, you should get better return for 2nd than 4th , maybe 1/3 odds for 2nd, 1/4 odds for 3rd, 1/5 odds for 4th etc etc.

DIE LINKE, have you seen that somewhere already?
By:
Regbutler
When: 13 Feb 25 22:21
Any altering of the each way market /terms would no doubt only be in the bookies favour... IE getting rid of the bad ew races by making them win only, or such other manoeuvres as to eradicate any edge the punter might have
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 13 Feb 25 23:52
He is so far off if he thinks that's the issue with punting Laugh
By:
racing6699
When: 14 Feb 25 07:35
The issue with punting is restrictions and affordability checks. Horse racing has these and a whole set of other issues. A strong vibrant Tote would be good solution if was outside Uk and Ukgc hence you could bet what you want. Anyone who thinks betting will get better under UKGC is delusional
By:
Brian
When: 14 Feb 25 09:13
He should study today's racing cards for a reason why punting horses is on the decline (yesterday's Sandown wasn't much better).

The quicker BHA realises we haven't got enough horses for seven day NH racing the better but I'm not holding my breath.
By:
The Management
When: 14 Feb 25 09:25
It just goes to show, people that have big ideas - sometimes only have the one of them!
By:
geoff m
When: 14 Feb 25 09:37
Combat dwindling interest.................   getting on without having to show yer daily income expenditure and yer inside leg measurement might be the best way forward 1st.
By:
sparrow
When: 14 Feb 25 09:55
The Management 14 Feb 25 09:25 
It just goes to show, people that have big ideas - sometimes only have the one of them!




Just a great pity that he and the punters did not stick with the first big idea instead of running away and crawling back to the bookmakers.
By:
The Management
When: 14 Feb 25 10:05
When you sell something (in the manner it was sold via an IPO) it just goes to the highest bidder. I suppose he knew it would end up with a bookmaker ultimately but he probably didn't imagine they would then deliberately leave it (the exchange element) to wither on the vine.

A bit like Maggie and all her privatisations of public services that had a virtual market monopoly - did she know that foreign investors & foreign governments would end up owning most Britain's infrastructure and leave it to rot while creaming off all of the profits? - Probably.
By:
sparrow
When: 14 Feb 25 10:14
And the punters just ran back home to their bookmakers shops instead of embracing the exchange. Typical traditional Racing people I suppose.
By:
howard
When: 14 Feb 25 10:54
Most punters just like stealing ricks  abusing offers and stuff like bad ew races not to mention inside info sparrow. Otherwise they would have to be the most intelligent and put in time and effort to be better than other punters.
By:
sparrow
When: 14 Feb 25 10:59
Could never be bothered with that crumbs off the table attitude, howard.
By:
impossible123
When: 14 Feb 25 11:00
With respect to Mr Black I think he's being professionally disingenuous here; another betting product will not alleviate the present downward trajectory of horseracing Levy.
I firmly believe a more immediate and positive effect will be to separate horseracing from fobt. Then introduce and enforce a minimum bet acceptance stake (legal) obligation for bookies like in Australia; more horseracing punters (I'll start to bet again) will return for sure meaning more horseracing Levy too. I think a new betting product will not mitigate, reduce AC or increase horseracing Levy until betting restriction.
By:
parispike
When: 14 Feb 25 11:24
A "radical idea" might be off course (so called) bookmakers actually taking a bet.
By:
mitolo
When: 14 Feb 25 16:28
black revolutionised betting for the better. nowadays hed be called a disruptor

notfair had 2 usps, laying and i/r but the pic problem wasnt addressed at all and the mmassive numbers of expensively-acquired customers went away disillusioned, and considerably poorer, but some made a killing

he had no part in ppower taking over and fell out badly with ed wray and others about the way the exchange was heading

waste management invokes the ghost of fatcher with a totally irrelevant and inaccurate assertion
By:
comingupthehill
When: 14 Feb 25 16:36
At least he’s trying to offer a solution,but the main issue is lack of horses in training v fixture list.the 2 don’t add up.

Olly bell has a good idea,bet builders in racing,
Nicholls to have a winner,harry skelton to have a winner,horse x to be placed etc in a builder.

All is irrelevant if the product can’t cope with the bets,due to lack of fields.
By:
comingupthehill
When: 14 Feb 25 16:39
As for the ipo,he did what all shrewd traders do,he sold at the top,before the crash.
By:
impossible123
When: 14 Feb 25 16:48
Betbuilder on horseracing? Only a moron or bookie paid stooge could come up with that, why? Dubious incidents eg stall not opening/jockey falling off/unseated tamely; dodgy dealings eg selection taking a walk in the betting or a withdrawal to negatively affecting bet condition eg minimum 5 selections (1/9 shortie on the flat).

I believe any sport with a betbuilder format including football should/ought to be regulated under a different betting/gaming licence like the casinos.
By:
comingupthehill
When: 14 Feb 25 16:50
If you bet Skelton to have a winner,he can’t fall off a horse 6 times,your logic dose t add up.
By:
MJK
When: 14 Feb 25 16:52
Anything to do with placings can't be trusted, particularly the big name jockeys like Buick who don't bother.
By:
sparrow
When: 14 Feb 25 17:06
Maybe I was a little too harsh with Black then, mitolo.
By:
unitedbiscuits
When: 14 Feb 25 17:15
I thought Andrew Black talked good sense.

The contingent here can probably eke out an advantage backing or laying place bets. F88k your self interest.
By:
mitolo
When: 14 Feb 25 17:18
what hes said sounds very much like spread betting. which he did most to crush

i dont know how many would go for it, but it is not impossible if done properly.some shrewdies would no doubt find a way of manipulation/exploitation that would prove profitable

not sure the betting landscape hasnt changed too much and gone away from racing that you wouldnt garner enough interest from the mass market. scoop 6 was big for a time, now an irrelevance
By:
mitolo
When: 14 Feb 25 17:22
indeed sparrer. aint bertrams fault. and he was against the pc

broken biscuits doesnt know what hes on about. try it brainbox. cant be done. f88k your ignorance
By:
comingupthehill
When: 14 Feb 25 17:26
If the total number of bets,stakes,punters is down.
New bets won’t alter that.

People who interact with the sport and bet,will bet on any system offered,new bets won’t increase this.
Getting more people to get involved with racing is the answer,but bets like bet builders might be a small part in getting them to stay involved.or blacks alternative ew system.

Racing by hook or by crook does enter people’s lives,day out,stag do,works trip.evade student days,concerts.

So racing gets a regular supply of new customers,it’s up to racing to keep them.
By:
unitedbiscuits
When: 14 Feb 25 17:28

Feb 14, 2025 -- 5:22PM, mitolo wrote:


indeed sparrer. aint bertrams fault. and he was against the pcbroken biscuits doesnt know what hes on about. try it brainbox. cant be done. f88k your ignorance


If you are claiming an idiot with no interest in racing cannot identify a race that is good for EW betting - because of the transparency of betfair - you are the bigger idiot.

By:
The Management
When: 14 Feb 25 17:45
mitolo14 Feb 25 16:28Joined: 13 Apr 21 | Topic/replies: 5,371 | Blogger: mitolo's blog
black revolutionised betting for the better. nowadays hed be called a disruptor


Did he feck! - they absolutely had the opportunity, the concept and the product to do that - and he utterly failed! Kudos to him for selling up at a price that implied he had succeeded or that it could be done - but getting a a massive payday doesn't alter the fact that he utterly failed.

This is evidenced by the fact that in the industry you are claiming he disrupted and revolutionised - there are now more "bookmakers" out there than there have ever been before - and they are making more money, from more customers, than ever before. It's disrupted nothing (mostly because they couldn't come up with a charging model that worked).
By:
The Management
When: 14 Feb 25 18:03
Not saying BF didn't revolutionise betting for the people that actually use the product btw, you, me everybody on here - just that given the incredible potential of the concept - it's actually hard to imagine how they failed to get everybody to adopt it, so as to completely revolutionise & disrupt the whole industry.

But they didn't!
By:
mitolo
When: 14 Feb 25 18:14
unitedbiscuits Joined: 27 Jan 02
Replies: 2011814 Feb 25 17:28 
Feb 14, 2025 -- 5:22PM, mitolo wrote:

indeed sparrer. aint bertrams fault. and he was against the pcbroken biscuits doesnt know what hes on about. try it brainbox. cant be done. f88k your ignorance


If you are claiming an idiot with no interest in racing cannot identify a race that is good for EW betting - because of the transparency of betfair - you are the bigger idiot


i must be. dont understand what you are on about



he did revolutinise betting, otherwise we wouldnt be here. the fact there are more bookmakers is for different reasons; deregulation, change of tax policy and foreign firms among them

they had to chop their margins to compete and there was better value all round because of this

they starting offering ealry prices

they offered fptp

the odds on football increased massively from the usual ceiling of 100/1 to the famous 5000/1 lester, which wouldnt have been half that otherwise

he gave up control after 15 years, ishk because he wanted to concentrate on his breeding operation, which had always been a passion, and he used the payday to fund it. the fact notfair took a wrong turn is not his doing. and he never had enough control anyway, even if hed remained. he is dead against whats happened but hes too diplomatic to say so and is famously reticent about washing his laundry in public and dislikes confrontation

he didnt 'fail utterly'
By:
comingupthehill
When: 14 Feb 25 21:46
In his guest column in the post.

He says,ew betting is loved by the bookies,because mug punters do it.

But haven’t the bookies been saying for years,that they lose on ew.

Which is it,Richard birch in his column in the outlook,says many times,he’s had 100 ew at 7/2 etc.

I don’t think getting better returns on a 2nd over a 4th will change the betting landscape,given the lesser number of races that qualify for ew 3/4 places.
By:
jimnast
When: 15 Feb 25 05:40
A factor for the dwindling interest could be contributed to the amount of horses that drift alarmingly of the exchange he founded and run accordingly without any questions been asked.
By:
Autocue
When: 15 Feb 25 11:00
Andrew Black can feck off. Ante-post betting was much more enjoyable before his betfair shoite.
By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 15 Feb 25 11:11
I think it's too intellectual, complicated and intangible for the masses.  Betfred are hardly likely to change the placepot either since they bet in it en masse with inside knowledge.
By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 15 Feb 25 11:19
If you want a leaderboard with points for performance, it's basically Fantasy Football dressed up.  I like Fantasy Games, but it's a much smaller market than standard betting.
By:
howard
When: 15 Feb 25 11:22
can't have that jimnast. It never happened before Betfair of course Wink   Clyde spot-on.  Good post from Mitolo regarding IR. Almost live internet pics should have been set up from day one.
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com