Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 5 of 5  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 187
By:
1st time poster
When: 11 Dec 24 11:48
a bit like arther Daley on the one arm bandit at the policemen's ball Laugh
By:
howard
When: 11 Dec 24 12:14
"Alistair Down was not as wonderful a writer as some would make out".  But still better than nearly all the others.
By:
howard
When: 11 Dec 24 12:17
"I'm old enough to remember the late Alastair Down writing an article in the Rancid Post extolling the pleasures of a day on the machines".   I find a 100% in favour article hard to believe. Doubt anyone can post it ?
By:
CagliariG
When: 11 Dec 24 12:27
If memory serves Howard his article was about sea front arcades when he was a child so hardly anything to do with FOBT online debate or 100 % in favour? Stand to be corrected btw.
By:
howard
When: 11 Dec 24 12:34
Sparra fell for it ...no surprise there.
By:
CagliariG
When: 11 Dec 24 12:38
Exposed your attempt to invent a story Komrade Howard, too easy like the beating your boys took in Syria!!!
By:
howard
When: 11 Dec 24 12:41
I was doubting the story.  Can you read or are you mental ?
By:
CagliariG
When: 11 Dec 24 12:43
Of course you were Komrade,did the FSB check it out for you?
By:
dumplingheid
When: 11 Dec 24 14:28
Yet again a sensible topic degraded into vitriolic abuse , everyone has a point of view that is conducive to where we are today whether it be 2% of the problem or 98% of the problem , i for one can not see a road back as there has been that much damage done by the said bookmakers/government under the guise of protecting the customer, Heres my proof i went into a local bookmaker to use the toilet (who had restricted me because of betting on scottish football ) on a saturday night not one punter in there just four people using the FOBTS, every single one of the four people had been excluded at one time or another and had spent spent varying lengths of time in the local mental health hospital to assist with there problem gambling, I brought this to the attention of the manager and later to the area manager stating the obvious about there mental health issues and how they had self excluded in the past, his reaction was they are either going to spend there money in here or across the road at a competitor so i would rather they spent it in here so as i can meet my targets , ( i asked him i thought you didnt have any targets for the fobts?),
By:
oneten
When: 12 Dec 24 09:53
Yes dumpling I agree. A fantastic thread with so many interesting and valid points raised which are all relevant .
Far more than one person could have come up with and it truly extols the benefit of group think.

Shoodacooda , I can't believe that in your above post. I do believe you, but I cannot get my head around the fact you have shown bf you have earnings around 9k a month but they have deemed a deposit limit of £300 per month appropriate.

I bet if your deposits were for their casino products they would have set your limit far higher!
By:
CagliariG
When: 12 Dec 24 11:00
Oneten, what is so fantastic about a thread that just regurgitated what every similar thread has already covered and that with plagiarised posts from the usual bookie bashers with hardly a word about the roles of the GC or Government?

Where you get "Fantastic thread" from is anybody's guess but no honour in self praise anyway.
By:
stu
When: 12 Dec 24 11:25
It may be a pipedream, but I sometimes wonder about punters (who just want to bet) actually starting (at least some of them) to give up on bookies and start using exchanges more.

I never really understand why that doesn't seem to be happening more...
By:
stu
When: 12 Dec 24 11:27
Linked to that - surely exchanges should make use of poor service by bookies, and use that as an edge in marketing the product (though I realise BF is also part bookie of course...)
By:
CagliariG
When: 12 Dec 24 11:29
Maybe you should ask PP that question stu, the original concept died when BF was sold to him.
By:
sparrow
When: 12 Dec 24 11:56
stu 12 Dec 24 11:25 
It may be a pipedream, but I sometimes wonder about punters (who just want to bet) actually starting (at least some of them) to give up on bookies and start using exchanges more.

I never really understand why that doesn't seem to be happening more...



It has been a mystery to me for quite some time but horse racing people are very traditional in their outlook and never really wanted to change their allegiance to the bookmakers despite constantly moaning about them at every opportunity.
By:
hulk23
When: 12 Dec 24 12:13
exchange was designed as competition to the traditional bookmaker.  bewildering then that they have allowed them to come under the control of bookmakers who are obviously going to do absolutely fk all to promote their advantages over their traditional offering.  quite the opposite, they've flooded the markets with their own money and restricted a lot of punters (under the guise of affordability - I cannot get my head around the fact you have shown bf you have earnings around 9k a month but they have deemed a deposit limit of £300 per month appropriate 'restricted')
By:
howard
When: 12 Dec 24 12:39
punters want someone to hate...and prefer it not to be fellow punters
By:
1st time poster
When: 12 Dec 24 13:04
serious/betting fanatics etc cant get that their still a miniscule % of overall punters Betfair doesn't really lend itself to betting night before,morning for race ,at work, fav jockeys, trainers ,multiples etc etc,its really for serious punters
By:
hulk23
When: 12 Dec 24 13:12
every time a 25/1 shot wins on the tv it should flash up "paid 43/1 on the exchange" so anyone that had a tenner on it at the bookies is made aware they just spunked an extra £180 ...
By:
sparrow
When: 12 Dec 24 13:16
1st time poster 12 Dec 24 13:04 
serious/betting fanatics etc cant get that their still a miniscule % of overall punters Betfair doesn't really lend itself to betting night before,morning for race ,at work, fav jockeys, trainers ,multiples etc etc,its really for serious punters



So these serious punters who get their bets on night before, early morning etc. and yet other people obviously not so serious can't get on!
By:
howard
When: 12 Dec 24 13:19
"at work, fav jockeys, trainers"    nothing to stop them playing exchange.   And what makes you think that the players here and especially on the forum are talented winning punters ?  But admit they have the time to look at the screen all day
By:
1st time poster
When: 12 Dec 24 14:23
Betfair been going for what 25 yrs,look at liquidity 20 mines before a race

if you no of any other reasons why liquidity on betfair is basically non excistent 20 mins before a race,please let us in on the secret
I sit in front of a screen all day ,all the time in the world,racing savy but still prefer betting with slybet ,because like most punters I like ew.enhanced places, not involved with unmatched etc,etc
By:
CagliariG
When: 12 Dec 24 14:29
Racing savvy 1st TP and all day on Slybet but unaware of their dispute with Arena? Potential poster boy for the GC's crackdown!!
By:
howard
When: 12 Dec 24 15:54
you don't want BF deductions on NR's for one thing.  But bookies don't need liquidity. They take the bet or not and  often depends on who is betting.
By:
impossible123
When: 12 Dec 24 18:33
It's abundantly clear bookies do not want savvy punters chipping away the size of their cherry; bookies see this cherry theirs alone, and no intruder is allowed. As such, bookie will use every trick in the book to maintain this position eg indiscriminately / overzealously in enforcing AC; AC is supposed to monitor persistent big losers/possibly money launderers playing fobts (mainly), not horseracing.

However, AC is also a timely "gift" from the Gambling Commission (GC) used by bookies knowingly and readily to weed out unprofitable accounts and savvy punters despite the insistence of GC AC only affects a very small minority of horseracing punters.
By:
formoftheace
When: 13 Dec 24 08:45
howard 12 Dec 24 12:39 
punters want someone to hate...and prefer it not to be fellow punters

Deary me Howard don’t you read comments ?
By:
howard
When: 13 Dec 24 11:44
u part of the brains trust ?
By:
TheGoddess
When: 16 Dec 24 19:11
https://www.racingpost.com/news/gambling-review/how-a-punter-with-average-losses-of-4p-a-day-got-caught-in-an-affordability-check-nightmare-aNxLi4v4YOif/
Page 5 of 5  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com