|
By:
butler, if they put these rioters away they'll have to release other cons early to make room for them so where's the gain ?
|
|
By:
Eric, not quite sure what you're saying, sorry
I was saying that the rioters were put in prison very quickly, and with length of sentences that wouldn't normally be given for the level of the offence, if it hadn't happened in a riot situation His own MP could face equally swift justice, given the footage we've seen The bit about the Manchester Airport incident was a separate point, but in both cases I think the sentencing could be problematic if the public see it as too lenient |
|
By:
There were rioters that deserved jail, then there were people encouraged to plead guilty for speech in a supposedly free speech nation.
The things ppl said were inconvenient for a government hell bent on denial of error or responsibility or even admitting the problem. People were called criminals pre trial, yet that apparently wasn’t jeopardising their right to a fair trial, whereas people who simply based their views on the stabbing case based on previous examples were treated like they had committed some heinous crime, because the truth again is inconvenient. When Elon argued for free speech, and inferred Britain was entering civil war, it was instantly criticised rather than debated, they used language like ‘go after elon’, shoot the messenger rather than address the problem. You can’t talk about the problems because the narrative has been decided for you and what you get told is what they want you to think. Everyone who didn’t agree was labelled ‘far right’ while creeping towards another set of ‘hate’ laws trialled in countries such as Scotland, and now Ireland. Now we have Parliament encouraged to not ask difficult questions about timings of who knew what, when, in contrast to what was divulged as the official statements as the two opposite positions now start to converge. When Parliament finally gets to debate this whole affair expect an absolute 5hite storm, because you can deny and hide the problem for only so long until finally you have to face the facts. |
|
By:
And let’s not forget for those who arn’t keeping up with events.
It was said people posting links to footage of riots (and what else?) was classed as a crime. That’s reporting in most people’s books. As far as I saw most people who the state had decided were guilty before trial were told by their council that they would be remanded until trial if they didn’t plead guilty. Meanwhile the labour councillor (who may still get found guilty next year when it goes to trial) who shouted down a megaphone instructing what needs to be done to ‘far right’ people (who exactly are far right anyway, anyone you disagree with?) …was given bail. |
|
By:
Sorry about that Reg, I misunderstood the header.
Thought you were complaining about offenders NOT being put away. Sincere apologies mate. |
|
By:
agree with dusty .
|
|
By:
Fair question to ask Reg. I wonder if he will end up in court as happened with Ben Stokes?
|
|
By:
Musk was talking utter bollix about the UK entering civil war. The British state has been putting down upstarts (at home and abroad) for centuries. The 2024 rioters have shat their pants and won't be back. If you are up for it, dustybin, get off your keyboard and have a go yourself. No, didn't think so.
|
|
By:
Remember the BLM protesters were protesters. But those opposed to open borders and having children murdered by Islamic invaders are rioters.
You don't hate the MSM and the Government enough. |
|
By:
Regbutler 30 Oct 24 21:39
That's what he promised and followed up on the rioters in July and August Pretty heavy custodial sentences, compared to other crimes, most would agree, to put a stop to the rioting You've been caught on camera, no point in pleading not guilty otherwise sentence will be longer So, why not the same for his own Labour MP caught on camera assaulting a man in the street? Not much to mitigate, apart from being goaded by the man, in his words If he doesn't get 3 years plus then something wrong, imo ewe can have 66's he gets anywhere near 3yrs. |
|
By:
Oh, I forgot.
*Far Right Rioters |
|
By:
What a moronic post by the Lefty.
The idea that the state regulates opinion is the stuff of communism I’ll give you that, but to think that for perhaps the first time in living memory the majority demographic starts to ‘riot’ and all sentiment is lulled by state directed injustices that did more than send rioters to jail, it interfered with people’s right to protest, has remedied that sentiment is pure stupidity. They gaslit the public into thinking simply being at protests was akin to being racist rioters, when it is not….they also had plans to re establish the meaning of Islamophobia, one based on race which is about as insane as the wokerati asserting what a woman based on a feeling. The MSM also gaslit people into thinking having legitimate concerns about the economics and cultural aspects of immigration was akin to ‘far right’ tendency, when it is not. What Starmer’s government has done has simply pushed the problem down the line, people havnt changed their opinions because of threats of silencing them, if anything that only makes it worse. |
|
By:
Rico, I wouldn't even take 66s
But, if I was one of those "rioters" put away for 18 months, 2 years plus... I might be slightly miffed if he gets anything less than that |
|
By:
People actually voted for this pleb!
https://x.com/BGatesIsaPyscho/status/1820315183857668124 |
|
By:
Another prick with TDS. I'm sure Trump won't forget this.
![]() |
|
By:
the rioters setencing was purely to halt any more riots.
|
|
By:
Starmer had Pincher already convicted when he was using it to make Johnson's position untenable at PMQs.
This as usual is the deep state cloying together to protect each other. Even cynically arranging this to be buried under the budget. Didn't work, mind. BBC Edwards got similar protection for as long as they could string it out. |
|
By:
The protests and disorder happened because people aren't as stupid as they hope, and are fully aware we're being gaslit to protect people high up the grievance hierarchy. And, unsurprisingly, they were right. Told us it wasn't terror related, with apparently home made poison and islamist 'how to's' in his yard
![]() |
|
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps • October 31, 2024 2:59 PM GMT
the rioters setencing was purely to halt any more riots. It was used to stop dissidents. There were many people who attended who didn't break any law at all. But they were told if they even take part in the protest they would face jail time. They were protesting! And it was the Government and MSM that labelled them ALL rioters. Only a very small number actually committed any real crime. They even imprisoned a couple of gay guys who got caught up in the PROTESTS who did nothing more than shout at Police. |
|
By:
dissidents
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
wp s hero putin knows how to deal with dissidents
he kills em |
|
By:
My opening post has been removed...!!!
That's a first time ever for me All I suggested was that Starmer could fast track his own MP for swift justice, and was wondering what sentence he might get |
|
By:
My opening post has been removed...!!!
That's a first time ever for me All I suggested was that Starmer could fast track his own MP for swift justice, and was wondering what sentence he might get |
|
By:
they compensated for it by letting you have 2 goes at this one
|
|
By:
Cheers mitolo
Does someone have to complain to a moderator, if they still exist, to get a post removed? |
|
By:
Do we even know that the MPs victim has made a complaint?
Perhaps he feels he could do without the publicity of a court case. |
|
By:
any of those jailed appeal ?
|
|
By:
No surprise, Reg. The mods on here are all Labour goons!
As for muggy, does Putin send his own elderly citizens, who have no previous criminal record to jail for protesting about open borders and then give low IQ 3rd world invaders easy access to them so they can bully them into suicide? |
|
By:
no
because nobody is allowed any form of protest. all gatherings are illegal and are broken up the omon special police that break demonstrators heads before they are dragged off and sentenced to 15 years for even mentioning war. thats the lucky ones. others like navalny are perecuted poisoned tortured and murdered thanks for asking no reginald. if the mod spots something they are wary of(racism being the touchy one) it will disappear rapido but its more common if someone has. ive had more removed by a vexatious poster who works for the moderator and deletes whatever he disapproves of, i.e anything not left-wing. hence ive given feeding his power trip on the politics forum and make meself unpopular here instead id be surprised if your post was offensive |
|
By:
FFs, get a grip of yourselves or this place will end up like the Politics Forum.
|
|
By:
he started it
|
|
By:
Noticed mods took down two post where I commented on the blog of others one was,
Barking at a police dog and Was he offered a piece of birthday cake. |
|
By:
You've swallowed more garbage spoon fed to you by the MSM. The "Anti-War" protesters were made up of Anti-Russian globalist stooges that were all paid for by Soros and Co. One last time, the War was of the U.S. making via blatant provocation. You only have to observe their response to the election result of Georgia to see what their true intentions are. And that's to destabilize and instigate further War. I have nothing else left to say on this, Muggy. You obviously disagree with everything I say on the subject so lets leave it at that.
|
|
By:
the protestors were entirely genuine and you know it. you ignore the fact any protest is illegal. you are deranged. hes said ukraine is full of nazis so hes 'cleansing' it. by killing 500k and kidnapping 1000s of kids
you are amazingly trusting of a brutal dictator who crushes all opposition and has closed all media and locked up tens of 1000s. and you have been caught spreading his propaganda you couldnt talk as you do in russia. youd be very soon dead. i disagree with you because you are a fool in denial 'leave it at that'. = i know im beat |
|
By:
Beat? By you?
Putin has an 80%+ approval rating in Russia so I know for a FACT they weren't genuine protesters. Everything you say is just regurgitated MSM propaganda. I already told you the MSM is corrupt to the core and it's owned by certain people who want never ending Wars. |
|
By:
I expect you were an avid reader of Pravda whippin, the only surprise is that the Putin approval rating is not 100% leaving 20% in jeopardy if they ever voiced dissention. Putin apologists should meet my Makarov and be buried without ceremony imvhho of course!!
|
|
By:
Reeves wouldn’t be missing if she passed tbf….
|
|
By:
if hes so popular why does he kill everyone who tries to stand against him? and he abolished the constitution to make himself president for life. ok with you. he will die in the kremlin, the wealthiest man in the world.
yes. all msm in europe is propaganda. all nations are lying about ukraine. all they want is wars. sweden finland norway and the baltic states are so bored with a prosperous quiet existence they want to stir it up a bit and take in a few million refugees. denmark and holland have handed over their entire arsenal, such as it is. they so want more war you say its a provocation but totally ignore what he said about re-uniting russia and ukraine-the sole reason he made himself dictator-nobody else would do it its the west and its open media to blame. amazing how they all act in concert and go along with the colossal cost in money and human life. a vicious mass-killer is taken at face-value while all of europe is complicit in conspiring against him. you are unwell |