Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 113 comments are related to the topic:
Champions:Full Gallop ITV 1 9pm Tonight

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 113
By:
acey deucy
When: 20 Jul 24 14:36
Episode 2 will get ITV viewers interested - 'The love life of Paul Nicholls'.....Had more Woman than Warren Beatty and Kieron Fallon combined..Fact.
By:
Slicer
When: 20 Jul 24 14:41
Will any of them have the courage to say what a good rider he was?
By:
BoosterRooster
When: 21 Jul 24 16:20
Watched episodes 2 & 3 on itv x as I didn’t have the patience to wait until Friday. It does get better tbf and is quite a good watch.

The itv presenter talking heads, mostly repeating each other, or repeating what has just been said by a trainer or jockey, are both unnecessary and annoying, they ruin it for me. It’s a shame that the majority of it is retrospective interviews too. There is some good raw footage though, that makes it worth watching.

Would have been far more interesting if they had used more of that footage, filmed when emotions were high. I think it’s a bit too boring in its current format to capture public imagination, but who knows.
By:
1st time poster
When: 21 Jul 24 16:33
oily bell might have had a few women in his time but you lot must have been watching the wrong show because off the back it oily bell spent all day saturday telling us he was going to marry harry cobbden  off the back of his performance in the show Laugh, oily told us just after napping his bessie mate eustaces horse in the super sprint, their like a small interbred village in a remote mountain range somewhere
By:
freddiewilliams
When: 21 Jul 24 17:18
Userscreaming from beneaththewaves • July 20, 2024 2:07 PM BST
I thoroughly enjoyed it while I was watching it. It's only now I've read this thread that I realise how bad it was.

Jeez
By:
freddiewilliams
When: 21 Jul 24 17:22
I haven't watched .might though when there's 10ft of snow
By:
penzance
When: 21 Jul 24 17:23
Thought it wasn't that bad tbh.
By:
1st time poster
When: 21 Jul 24 17:55
to be fair its some soft landing zone itv/bha are aiming for,getting newer,younger people interested in racing but not interested enough to ask/care about
horse ,staff welfare
bent jocks
bent trainers
betting restrictions etc
to be fair all though their to dim to notice it theyve already got this market with the concert goers and should be happy with that
the looney chamberlain trying to pass 100,s of younger visitors queuing up to get in newbury on saturady as racegoers when 90% of them were in fact  conceert goers
By:
duffy
When: 21 Jul 24 20:37
Sanitized guff, trying to attract new blood to the game without addressing the prickly issues, as yet anyway. Did they put a postscript up informing the viewer that Shishkin had since suffered a rather uncomfortable demise or that the affable shark had courted notatiety by parading a dead horse through the streets.

How about screening at least one horse falling then rather than countless unseats.

How would the program been edited if a tragedy had befallen last years King George, Oh I see, that day would have been shelved from the documentary.
By:
duffy
When: 21 Jul 24 20:46
Cobden seemed to come out of the show favourably, I thought he came across a bit smug and how about someone teaching him to pronounce Shishkin correctly and not shisskin.
By:
ashleigh
When: 22 Jul 24 13:06
Market Rasen credits the crowd of 9,000 on saturday, up from 7,500 last year down  to the documentary shown the night before. 

if that's the case, got to be good for racing.
By:
Hayden
When: 22 Jul 24 13:24
ITV the only channel doing something in an attempt to keep the sport from fading into oblivion Ash so i find it hard to knock them personally , prog was never going to get any thumbs up on a gambling forum as it's full of punters who " know everything " having been involved in the game for x years , so not receptive in something that may/will encourage new blood to follow the sports when us current crop pop our clogs , which is silly in my view.

As for leaving out some negatives , it's a promotional program and let's be honest threads galore appear when other websites ( bbc in particular ) highlight negatives about the sport , can't have it every way as you either want the sports longevity with the potential to flourish or you don't , we all loved the seventies / eighties when racing nostalgically was in it's prime in our eyes but like many other things in life that's just what it is , nostalgia.

Well said Market Rasen for publishing , whether it be accurate or not.


Good luck today   Happy
By:
sparrow
When: 22 Jul 24 13:34
we all loved the seventies / eighties when racing nostalgically was in it's prime in our eyes but like many other things in life that's just what it is , nostalgia.






People in the 70s or 80s would also recall the 50s and 60s as an even greater era for the popularity of the sport. Nostalgia is never what it used to be.
By:
Slicer
When: 22 Jul 24 13:38
Nostalgia is always a thing of the past. Just as hindsight is never there when needed.
By:
Hayden
When: 22 Jul 24 13:47
Agree sparrow , i don't do nostalgia personally but we continually hear how great everything used to be in horse racing with no balance offered , thinking particularly coverage wise when we relied on waiting for a crappy teletext service for results , live terrestrial coverage not waiting for the SP before darting off to skiing from the Alps and of course waiting for the weekend when we might just get some live racing coverage and see some horses or else visiting betting shops to hear some guy spend 90% of the race howling about the last furlong so that he mentions every horse in the race , those memories are more dark ages than nostalgia for me.

In modern times by comparison we have it so good that a jockey pronouncing a horses name differently to the rest gets highlighted as a program negative , give me strength.
By:
sparrow
When: 22 Jul 24 13:57
I just never forget watching my dad clerking on course in the 1950s and the massive amount of bets taken in such a short time especially when he was working at White City dogs. A very different world as you point out hayden but we neither knew nor expected anything other in those days.
By:
Cider
When: 22 Jul 24 13:58
I don't have a problem with the positivity Hayden but the show was spinning something that is fake, a false premise. For multiple reasons. Racing is no longer about David vs Goliath, it's which owner has the deepest pockets and a handful of galactico trainers. The KG is not really an important race any more and dines off its nostalgia. We will never see scenes of kauto, best mate or dessie again. Betting is central, critical to the sport but I assume this series will completely ignore it as they are trying to marginalise sports betting as being socially uncomfortable.

It does actually seem quite jarring to me that itv ostensibly supports horse racing as they hate pretty much anything else that threatens to be traditional, English/British heritage.

It was the opening part of the series, but ordinarily they push what they see as the primary content out on the debut of a series. Perhaps there will be some progression on the content.
By:
barstool
When: 22 Jul 24 14:12
Have not watched it. From what I have read, it was what most on here expected it to be.

It was never going to be a "warts and all" show.
By:
Hayden
When: 22 Jul 24 14:21
Cider , respect you posts mate as always but the false premise bit and showing something is fake is surely something for a newbie to digest further down the line , if those Market Rasen extras are kosher i'll bet those 1,500 won't be remotely interested in the David vs Goliath scenario , maybe a few years down the line but initially to be drawn it'll be the like of watching horse racing with a small financial interest , the fact of deepest pockets and how the industry works now seems fairly irrelevant to probably 90% of punters as they either no interest in that deeper knowledge or else fail to see how that affects their daily yankee.
By:
Cider
When: 22 Jul 24 14:30
raspberry gate more likely to be the weather!

there's two parts to the critique isn't there, if was the show trying to sell the sport, or create an entertaining show. it fell between the two stools. it wasn't at all gripping like some of these 'insider' jobs in sports can be. as others alluded to, way too repetitive to be an entertaining watch for a casual. if selling the sport then it was a false representation of the current situation.

It's fair to admit that I'm a 'knowing' viewer and not the target audience.
By:
Hayden
When: 22 Jul 24 14:39
What we need really for balance is some feedback from a few of those Market Rasen extras.   Happy

Still , we slightly disagree but without hurling insults after more than one exchange , must be a forum first   Grin
By:
Pilsudski
When: 22 Jul 24 16:01
Nostalgia is a liar,Sparrow and Slicer.As often as not.
By:
duffy
When: 22 Jul 24 16:07
Nostalgia is a wonderful feeling, it wraps it's arms around you and carries you awayLove
By:
Slicer
When: 22 Jul 24 16:14
It's not nostalgia that's the liar Mr P, it's the individuals recollection that's the liar.
By:
differentdrum
When: 22 Jul 24 16:17
Market Rasen would say that though, wouldn't they? What was more important to the crowd, the programme on friday, or the weather?

I don't think I have heard a negative word about the programme from the industry. A few cheerleaders on here have obviously felt the need to join in.

Any success from an ITV point of view will be measured in viewing figures. I think 1.4 million was given out. Let's see how that compares with the next five weeks. How does it compare to viewing figures for whatever is normally shown at 9.00 pm on a friday? If it's a lot lower then I don't see how they can justify putting it on. They're not going to be too bothered about a couple more people having a day out at Market Rasen.
By:
differentdrum
When: 22 Jul 24 16:20
It certainly isn't a lie to suggest that racing had far more significance in the sporting world than it does now. It's now just a bit part player.
By:
Hayden
When: 22 Jul 24 16:26
That's another way of looking at it though dd in that you've picked out the main positive posted by ashleigh and immediately written it off as lies , it may well be fabricated i've no idea but just saying.

Also the comparison with what's normally on the main channel at 9pm doesn't feel right , it's a minority sport so the figures are always going to be millions behind say a new episode of Midsomer Murders whichever channel it's showing.

I'd prefer to think that someone somewhere has done extremely well to convince the channel to give them a 9pm slot   Happy
By:
Cider
When: 22 Jul 24 16:35
The broadcast ratings can only be correctly judged on the consolidated figures including time lapse, cut off is 7 days after broadcast. This is 41-50 from the latest published figures.

[   This image is no longer available.   ]
By:
1st time poster
When: 22 Jul 24 16:57
raspberry scenario is garbage, no one or next to no one goes to the races with 24hrs notice.never mind nearly 25% of your entire crowd
By:
differentdrum
When: 22 Jul 24 16:59
Accessibility is a big problem for horse racing. You can't just say to the children 'let's have a go at horse racing'. It's not like bouncing a basketball up and down the street, or kicking a football against a wall. Only the wealthy few can provide access to a pony.

Like it or not, the younger audience are attracted by the idea of winning a few quid, whatever the sport, but I don't suppose one of these programmes will be about betting.
By:
1st time poster
When: 22 Jul 24 17:00
its ridiculous staements like this from raspberry that make racing look like idiots when in a few months time chambers and itv etc tell us how racing is struggling, a spotanious day at the races within 24 hrs will be north of £200+ without a bet
By:
steerforth
When: 22 Jul 24 17:18
I saw in a preview a comparison to the "All Or Nothing" docs on other sports. It was nothing like them. Seemed more like a piece of marketing of an ITV investment, not quite propaganda, more of a paean. To be charitable and to credit them with good intentions, I fear it fell short. I too question those Market Rasen numbers. But if if I'm wrong, and it brings new interest from a new generation, they're not following the same hooks as I did.
The attraction of horse racing in for the vast majority was all about the whiff of jeopardy, allied to a rising climax of pay off or disappointment, packaged in a dangerous, slightly underhand, forbidden world of betting shops and bookie pitches, clutching coloured tickets that could suddeny become worthless. Nostalgic? Sure, but certainly a lost experience.
Somehow I can't imagine that being preached the "everything is wonderful" soundtrack, will have quite the same pulling power.
By:
1st time poster
When: 22 Jul 24 18:20
you,d need to no the weather,other sporting events,local attractions from last yr before you compare numbers,was last yr 1st weekend of school hols etc,etc
By:
differentdrum
When: 22 Jul 24 18:34
Much simpler to just say what the industry wants you to say.
By:
BoosterRooster
When: 22 Jul 24 19:03
I, like many on here, found my way to horse racing through betting. When I was young it wasn’t the spectacle of the Grand National that I looked forward to, it was the fact that I got to place a bet on it.

Racing, both horse and greyhound, is still the best betting sport imo.  Even into my late teens I was still a far bigger football fan than racing. It wasn’t until I started betting on racing regularly, and started finding out about all the different ways that you could bet on it, that I became really interested in it. Interested enough to start reading up and finding out more about it.

If attracting young people is the aim, then I think a documentary about gambling on horse racing, would have far more cut through than one just about the sport. If they showed people betting, and showed all the different ways you can bet, and sometimes win on the sport. On course punters, the betting ring, shop punters, arbors, in runners, online gamblers, form readers, matched bettors, price traders, drone users, exchange shops, fast pics, high rollers and just regular punters who do it for fun. Make a documentary about the wide range of people and the various different methods of betting on the same sport.

Obviously not going to happen in this day and age, but most people I know, from a non racing background, got into it purely through betting. The brave jockey and well looked after horse theme doesn’t really seem to sell the sport very well, and if anything, seems a bit patronising to the people that they are trying to get interested. Because the fact is, for the majority of people, the main reason they are interested in a horse race, is because they have had a bet on it.
By:
The Management
When: 22 Jul 24 19:21
Spot on BR. The two things (racing and betting) are inextricably linked and also interdependent on each other. Anybody that thinks otherwise is a rare beast, a romantic or a fantasist. It's the reality - but in current times it's unfortunately an unpalatable reality. Betting gets a bad press, So they seem to insist on trying to sell the romance, the spectacle, the passion, the grit, etc, etc.

That doesn't work (imo) - so probably better to be up-front and honest about it (the betting) imo.
By:
The Management
When: 22 Jul 24 19:24
Either that or just hire a Tina Turner tribute act for after the racing. Cry
By:
formoftheace
When: 22 Jul 24 19:37
Why explain with lecturing tone ffs

Horse racing punting……most of the following are only interested in punting and finding winners….it’s obvious…since time began…
By:
formoftheace
When: 22 Jul 24 19:44
Championship jockey / trainer…Dan,Paul,Harry,Sean…..zzzzzzz

Confetti scattered for overpriced geldings ffs…..

Nico posh boy swearing on camera….

Bryony looking good…..big deal…
By:
comingupthehill
When: 22 Jul 24 19:51
BR,100% right.

But there’s a multitude of different punters and reasons why they bet.

They need to show all the main groups ,why they do it and how sometimes they can win.

From the stag do s ,backing favs,numbers names,jockeys etc
To the casual,I always back Mullins at Cheltenham types.
To the main group,a modest knowledge thus applying this to their betting.

I remember 2 drunks sat on the old tote stand at chelt,years ago,with a page of the daily star saying they were backing 2 horses in the county hurdle,when it was the last race on the Friday,
Me having 8 in it,cos it was the get out stakes and wanting to win before having to wait another year to go again.
Then watching their 2 come 1st and 2nd as my 8 tailed off.
It’s a long walk back to the car,worrying about needing a stake for the midlands national,knowing a year seems like a life time to try again.

All these groups can get something from a race day and betting,but loving horses and thinking a jockey is the greatest ever isn’t one of them.

But racing has to promote its stars,so what else can it do..

Does need to promote the betting more,but they are scared of being tarnished by it.
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com