|
By:
Little wonder you are reduced to trolling TM, clueless that winning strike rate outdoes every "Value" priced loser!! HTH
|
|
By:
You've got me there! - all those people losing at roulette, it's nothing to do with the prices, they just need to pick the right colour or number more often.
![]() |
|
By:
Move the goalposts to games of chance sum up your knowledge of betting or making a book, all you ever flap your gums about are hypotheticals!!
|
|
By:
Mathematics isn't hypothetical imo
|
|
By:
In your case it does not even add up!!!
|
|
By:
Ffs
|
|
By:
20 -1 0213000 CagliariG (3) Invalid selection -1.00 -£7.16 (26.09%) SR
Div 2 naps table His altermole ego done even worse |
|
By:
Take heart Quixall, he has failed more times than you and never provided a single proof of any success.
|
|
By:
Neither have you tubbymug
|
|
By:
Never lost a challenge yet for proofs madmutt, fancy a head to head for charity?
|
|
By:
I'd question why anyone would get into a head to head with a banned poster who has evaded the rules of BF
For now Giving advice on value, price & SR Don't make me laff Challenge yourself if so good Prem in 3 months If not donate That should sort your chaff out |
|
By:
Sorts you out as being a cowardly troll with no guts.........AGAIN!!!
|
|
By:
Hot air tubbymug
All you got Anyone you wish cancer on now smirf has moved on to better place ? Tubbymug iam iam iam Pot to p in Failed squaddie failed cop Failed punter Rast my case |
|
By:
Hotshot tubbymug
![]() 20 -1 0213000 CagliariG (3) Invalid selection -1.00 -£7.16 (26.09%) SR Div 2 naps table His altermole ego done even worse |
|
By:
Hotshot tubby altarmole ego
Boy theres been a lot Div 2 naps table 22 -1 02120-d GT Mole (3) Nighteyes - 5.00 Yarmouth Lost -1.00 -£8.71 (21.74%) SR |
|
By:
Outsiders beyond your comprehension in a competition madmutt?
You are the NAFFI entrant of surviving aka No Ambition And F@ck All Intellect ,odds on just to avoid relegation, sad tbh!!! |
|
By:
Cagliari,it’s obvious you don’t have a clue regarding value,overpriced or underlay……
Plain and simple for all to see…… |
|
By:
Well there you go. It's easy.
First find your winners, anybody can do that, lol. Now the only thing holding you back are prices. So if you're getting one winner in ten, make sure that winner is at least 10/1. And two winners in ten requires two winners over 4/1. Let's say 9/2 for comfort. We've cracked it! Barbados here we come. |
|
By:
Except you can't find the winners let alone choose your own prices.
|
|
By:
You've made a fair point there Dr C (imo) - which possibly explains why of the
|
|
By:
You've made a fair point there Dr C (imo) - which possibly explains why of the
|
|
By:
Last try ffs!
You've made a fair point there Dr C (imo) - which possibly explains why of the less than 1% of people on here that are consistently making it pay, probably more than 90% of them aren't doing it by trying to select (pre-race) the winner of a horse race! They are betting on prices, not selections. |
|
By:
The outcome (the winner) is often going to be of very little interest to them.
|
|
By:
Some of my best wins have emanated from backing a losing selection
![]() |
|
By:
I once spent about 7 hours rooting for a snooker player I don't like - because I had £50.50 green on him and only £50.25 on the other guy!
![]() |
|
By:
Should have level greened the odd 25p TM and gone out for the day
![]() |
|
By:
I'm old-school Hayden
![]() I still enjoy the buzz that the extra 25p gives me! |
|
By:
At my age i don't like to take on too much variance - but you've got to have a little bit if you want to feel alive
![]() |