An inspection was held as a result of concern over persistent rainfall. Riders, Harry Skelton, Niall Houlihan, Rex Dingle and James Davies; Trainers, Richard Bandey, the representative of Gary Moore and the representative of Ben Pauling; The Clerk of the Course were interviewed. Having considered the evidence, the Stewards were satisfied that racing could continue and as a result there was a 5 minute delay to the start of race 1.
Fixture NoteAn inspection was held as a result of concern over persistent rainfall. Riders, Harry Skelton, Niall Houlihan, Rex Dingle and James Davies; Trainers, Richard Bandey, the representative of Gary Moore and the representative of Ben Pauling;
and no success in catching up. They are incompetent. They will be just as late off here. 3 races within 15 mins of each other then a 15 minute gap. And they wonder why they are short of prize money.
and no success in catching up. They are incompetent. They will be just as late off here. 3 races within 15 mins of each other then a 15 minute gap. And they wonder why they are short of prize money.
Lingfield jumps cards are just a nuisance, they are either abandoned or delayed, inspecting, roll on Windsor so they can take the only decent card they've got off them.
Lingfield jumps cards are just a nuisance, they are either abandoned or delayed, inspecting, roll on Windsor so they can take the only decent card they've got off them.
4 runners and they will not have made up a second. It is ludicrous. The last race, two of the horse were "shown the first hurdle" adding another 60 seconds to the delay. It all reduces the take for the Levy this.
4 runners and they will not have made up a second. It is ludicrous. The last race, two of the horse were "shown the first hurdle" adding another 60 seconds to the delay. It all reduces the take for the Levy this.
but if punters won't bet on a subsequent event until they know the result of their "first" bet which. apparently, is a well known phenomenon in bookies, there will be fewer bets on Thurles in UK bookies because of clashes? marginal I accept, but it all adds up.
but if punters won't bet on a subsequent event until they know the result of their "first" bet which. apparently, is a well known phenomenon in bookies, there will be fewer bets on Thurles in UK bookies because of clashes? marginal I accept, but it a
Sure, there'll be fewer bets on Thurles, which affects the bookies' profits. But not one penny of those profits goes to the British Levy. Nothing at all.
Sure, there'll be fewer bets on Thurles, which affects the bookies' profits. But not one penny of those profits goes to the British Levy. Nothing at all.
No problem. Rest assured the bookies have realised it.
So has the BHA, and they've been lobbying the government for a long time for British bookmaker profits on foreign horse racing to be liable for contributions to the British Levy. And the bookmakers have been lobbying to keep things just as they are, thank you very much.
No problem. Rest assured the bookies have realised it. So has the BHA, and they've been lobbying the government for a long time for British bookmaker profits on foreign horse racing to be liable for contributions to the British Levy. And the bookmake