I have noticed that graphs after non runners are tending to show odds that have been matched at before the deduction. Take the 13:30 race at Newbury, Kyntara matched at a high of 7.11 yet the graph shows money has been matched much higher! Not very good Betfair at all!
What has been backed and layed are shown alongside the graph and they are correct after a reduction factor but the graph does not paint the same pictue.
What has been backed and layed are shown alongside the graph and they are correct after a reduction factor but the graph does not paint the same pictue.
It's a relatively recent thing this on racing graphs - same misleading impression applies with VAR voided goals where bets are adjusted but the graphs aren't.
My best guess is it either takes more processing power or manpower to adjust the graphs than they're willing to employ.
It's a relatively recent thing this on racing graphs - same misleading impression applies with VAR voided goals where bets are adjusted but the graphs aren't.My best guess is it either takes more processing power or manpower to adjust the graphs than
Considering Betfair introduced "beacons" to highlight hot and cold horses, you would think they would have the resources to ensure the graphs are 100% correct.
Considering Betfair introduced "beacons" to highlight hot and cold horses, you would think they would have the resources to ensure the graphs are 100% correct.